滑雪人論壇  

返回   滑雪人論壇 > 滑雪技術討論區 > 雙板Ski > Ski技術討論區

Ski技術討論區 管他是好咖還是怪咖,只要是咖就能發言,有任何技術問題,在此討論就對啦。

回覆
 
主題工具 顯示模式
舊 2012-07-05, 02:16 AM   #1
Blake
滑雪瘋2級
 
註冊日期: 2012-05-21
文章: 54
預設 Blake's mogul skiing

Hi everyone!

I noticed on my youtube statistics that my videos have been embedded here a few times so I thought I would stop by and say 'Hi'. Special thanks to Norman for setting up my account. I don't speak chinese so I don't know how much I can contribute here, but I am happy to post in English. I love travelling in Asia. My wife and I went to Thailand and Cambodia last year. I have a video of it on my youtube channel.

Here are some of my videos, one or two of these have been posted on here already, if anyone has any questions about my technique I'll be happy to answer the best I can:

2012 High Level Mogul Skiing and Steep Skiing - YouTube


2011 Mogul Skiing and Technical Terrain Skiing in Colorado - YouTube


此篇文章於 2012-09-21 10:28 AM 被 Blake 編輯。
Blake 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2012-07-06, 11:15 PM   #2
taichiskiing
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2009-02-07
文章: 3,756
預設 回覆: Hello from Blake Saunders

引用:
作者: Blake 查看文章
Hi everyone!

I noticed on my youtube statistics that my videos have been embedded here a few times so I thought I would stop by and say 'Hi'. Special thanks to Norman for setting up my account. I don't speak chinese so I don't know how much I can contribute here, but I am happy to post in English. I love travelling in Asia. My wife and I went to Thailand and Cambodia last year. I have a video of it on my youtube channel.

Here are some of my videos, one or two of these have been posted on here already, if anyone has any questions about my technique I'll be happy to answer the best I can:
2012 High Level Mogul Skiing and Steep Skiing モーグル - YouTube


2011 Mogul Skiing and Technical Terrain Skiing in Colorado - YouTube



Hi Blake,

Those are some great mogul skiing there; you do have some exciting techniques and skiing, and I'm really enjoying watching them.

Thanks for stopping by, and welcome to our forum. Maybe I feed you in a bit what we here are all about; we here is a small forum for a few enthusiatic Chinese skiers, mainly originally from Taiwan and HongKong, most of them are lurkers, and only a few posters posting, so don't be disappointed if no body responds to you or asking questions, they may not know better [to ask questions] as well as they are shy. Nevertheless, we do have a few PSIA and CSIA certified instructors posting here, and they'll be able to converse with you in English as well, just give them sometime to warm up.

As for me, I'm a Taichi skier, known on the 'net as "taichiskiing," though we ski differently, (though I used to ski nothing but moguls in my younger days, but I don't have my knees and your kind of vigorness anymore,) I'll be glad to converse with you with any skiing related subjects, as skiing is not just my passions but also my life; I'm living South Lake Tahoe, and ski at Heavenly mostly.

Taichi Skiing: a Taichi Skier's profile - YouTube



Once again, thanks for stopping by, and welcome to our forum.

:)
IS
taichiskiing 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2012-07-07, 05:22 PM   #3
norman
滑雪瘋鑽石級
 
norman 的頭像
 
註冊日期: 2008-09-24
文章: 11,008
發送 MSN 訊息給 norman 發送 Skype™ 訊息給 norman
預設 回覆: Hello from Blake Saunders

Hi Blake:

Great mogul skiing.

I have two questions, please.

1. How do you use legs to Absorption on bumps or moguls?

Are you first to Jump or hop than pull legs back?

Or to squat than pull legs back?

Or no Jump/hop/squat, only pull legs back on bumps or moguls?

Or other way?

2. What is your opinion that only use thigh muscle can pull legs back or not only use thigh muscle?
__________________
目前總滑天數74天。繼續累積中...我想滑雪。

滑雪人
norman 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2012-07-13, 11:33 AM   #4
Blake
滑雪瘋2級
 
註冊日期: 2012-05-21
文章: 54
預設 回覆: Hello from Blake Saunders

Norman asked in his post to explain my way of absorbing...

I have been translating this forum on google, it's not perfect, but I can basically understand everything.

I'll start with a basic explanation and then add my own conclusions about absorption after the first paragraph.
I wish we could have this translated by a professional translator or something. I've written the best explanation
of absorption that I can, I just hope it won't be too hard to understand since I'm writing in English.


The way to absorb moguls is to bring your knees up towards your chest as your feet hit them. On the uphill side
of the moguls, your feet need to be slightly out in front of you so that your skis can point up the mogul then on
the downhill side of the mogul your skis need to point down the mogul, which means your feet need to be curled
back towards your butt as you straighten your legs. In between moguls your skis point level (parallel to the
steepness of the ground under the moguls) and down the hill while your body is straight... and on top of the mogul
your skis should reach a point where they are also level and parallel to the steepness of the ground under the
moguls and your body is low, bent at the knees. --The motion of your legs will be like you're pedaling a bicycle
backwards.


If you keep your legs directly under you while you absorb, instead of doing a more circular motion like pedaling a
bike, then what happens is that the resistance of the ski (the stiffness of it) knocks your weight back on the uphill
side of the mogul (then possibly also forward on the downhill side). Your skis will also not stay on the snow if you
don't point them up the fronts and down the backs of moguls, unless they are as flexible as a well cooked noodle.


It's really important to bend at your knees and NOT at your hips. As your butt gets lower while you absorb, you
should not bend the angle of your back forward any more than you have to. In other words, don't let your shoulders
move forward any more than you have to. So how much do you have to? --The minimum amount necessary in order
to not have your weight too far back. The lower you need to absorb, the farther forward the angle of your back
will have to go in order to not have your weight too far back, but always move your back forward the minimum amount
necessary. Absorb mainly with your knees. If you have the angle of your back more forward than it has to be, then
you will not be able to absorb well. Your upper body will get in the way of the motion of your legs.


Your weight needs to be centered, NOT forward like most people say. If you are forward, you will smack your ski tips
and your feet into the moguls and you will not be balanced or smooth. You should also not be too far back with your
weight. Being too far back or forward also messes up the angles of your body. You have to be centered.


How low you need to absorb is determined by the size of the mogul. The amount your feet should be brought up should
be equal to the size of the mogul. A lot of mogul skiers have their skis come off of the ground between moguls. This
can happen for three reasons. Either the mogul skier is absorbing too slowly (he is bringing his feet up too slowly for
the speed he is skiing at) or his timing is off, or he is not absorbing deep enough. The cause of this bouncing could
also be all three reasons (bad timing, slow absorption and shallow absorption together). The faster you ski, the faster
you will need to bring your feet up on the uphill sides of moguls and the faster you'll have to push them down on the
downhill side in order to not come off the ground. It's best to stay on the ground so that you can be smoother. All
mogul skiers try to stay on the ground, but it's not easy at high speeds. You should never jump onto moguls. The
motion of your absorption should be more like pulling up your feet instead of squatting down or lowering your butt.
Imagine hanging from your arms on a pull-up bar and pulling your knees up, instead of doing squats. At high speeds you
pull your feet up and let the mogul pass under you. Your legs straighten when the mogul has passed and is no longer
under you. At lower speeds it's a little more like lowering your butt, at higher speeds it's more like pulling your feet up.


Try to hit the moguls as lightly as possible. Try to not make any noise when you hit them. Most skiers can't do it
quietly, but it's good to try.


Always do what feels natural and balanced, and keep your hands in front of you.

Thanks to everyone for all the replies : ) I will be back to talk more when I have more time. I have been extremely busy
lately. I actually wrote this post at work.
Blake 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2012-07-13, 02:51 PM   #5
norman
滑雪瘋鑽石級
 
norman 的頭像
 
註冊日期: 2008-09-24
文章: 11,008
發送 MSN 訊息給 norman 發送 Skype™ 訊息給 norman
預設 回覆: Hello from Blake Saunders

引用:
作者: Blake 查看文章
Norman asked in his post to explain my way of absorbing...

I have been translating this forum on google, it's not perfect, but I can basically understand everything.

I'll start with a basic explanation and then add my own conclusions about absorption after the first paragraph.
I wish we could have this translated by a professional translator or something. I've written the best explanation
of absorption that I can, I just hope it won't be too hard to understand since I'm writing in English.


The way to absorb moguls is to bring your knees up towards your chest as your feet hit them. On the uphill side
of the moguls, your feet need to be slightly out in front of you so that your skis can point up the mogul then on
the downhill side of the mogul your skis need to point down the mogul, which means your feet need to be curled
back towards your butt as you straighten your legs. In between moguls your skis point level (parallel to the
steepness of the ground under the moguls) and down the hill while your body is straight... and on top of the mogul
your skis should reach a point where they are also level and parallel to the steepness of the ground under the
moguls and your body is low, bent at the knees. --The motion of your legs will be like you're pedaling a bicycle backwards.


If you keep your legs directly under you while you absorb, instead of doing a more circular motion like pedaling a
bike, then what happens is that the resistance of the ski (the stiffness of it) knocks your weight back on the uphill
side of the mogul (then possibly also forward on the downhill side). Your skis will also not stay on the snow if you
don't point them up the fronts and down the backs of moguls, unless they are as flexible as a well cooked noodle.


It's really important to bend at your knees and NOT at your hips. As your butt gets lower while you absorb, you
should not bend the angle of your back forward any more than you have to. In other words, don't let your shoulders
move forward any more than you have to. So how much do you have to? --The minimum amount necessary in order
to not have your weight too far back. The lower you need to absorb, the farther forward the angle of your back
will have to go in order to not have your weight too far back, but always move your back forward the minimum amount
necessary. Absorb mainly with your knees. If you have the angle of your back more forward than it has to be, then
you will not be able to absorb well. Your upper body will get in the way of the motion of your legs.


Your weight needs to be centered, NOT forward like most people say. If you are forward, you will smack your ski tips
and your feet into the moguls and you will not be balanced or smooth. You should also not be too far back with your
weight. Being too far back or forward also messes up the angles of your body. You have to be centered.


How low you need to absorb is determined by the size of the mogul. The amount your feet should be brought up should
be equal to the size of the mogul.
A lot of mogul skiers have their skis come off of the ground between moguls. This
can happen for three reasons. Either the mogul skier is absorbing too slowly (he is bringing his feet up too slowly for
the speed he is skiing at) or his timing is off, or he is not absorbing deep enough. The cause of this bouncing could
also be all three reasons (bad timing, slow absorption and shallow absorption together).
The faster you ski, the faster
you will need to bring your feet up on the uphill sides of moguls and the faster you'll have to push them down on the
downhill side in order to not come off the ground. It's best to stay on the ground so that you can be smoother. All
mogul skiers try to stay on the ground, but it's not easy at high speeds. You should never jump onto moguls. The
motion of your absorption should be more like pulling up your feet instead of squatting down or lowering your butt.

Imagine hanging from your arms on a pull-up bar and pulling your knees up, instead of doing squats. At high speeds you
pull your feet up and let the mogul pass under you. Your legs straighten when the mogul has passed and is no longer
under you. At lower speeds it's a little more like lowering your butt, at higher speeds it's more like pulling your feet up.


Try to hit the moguls as lightly as possible. Try to not make any noise when you hit them. Most skiers can't do it
quietly, but it's good to try.


Always do what feels natural and balanced, and keep your hands in front of you.

Thanks to everyone for all the replies : ) I will be back to talk more when I have more time. I have been extremely busy
lately. I actually wrote this post at work.
Hi Blake:

Thank your real very well point and explain your way of absorbing.

I use green color point out some sentence. I hope you do not mind.
__________________
目前總滑天數74天。繼續累積中...我想滑雪。

滑雪人
norman 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2012-07-14, 12:41 PM   #6
pku
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2010-05-30
文章: 3,645
預設 回覆: Hello from Blake Saunders

引用:
作者: Blake 查看文章
Norman asked in his post to explain my way of absorbing...

I have been translating this forum on google, it's not perfect, but I can basically understand everything.

I'll start with a basic explanation and then add my own conclusions about absorption after the first paragraph.
I wish we could have this translated by a professional translator or something. I've written the best explanation
of absorption that I can, I just hope it won't be too hard to understand since I'm writing in English.


The way to absorb moguls is to bring your knees up towards your chest as your feet hit them. On the uphill side
of the moguls, your feet need to be slightly out in front of you so that your skis can point up the mogul then on
the downhill side of the mogul your skis need to point down the mogul, which means your feet need to be curled
back towards your butt as you straighten your legs. In between moguls your skis point level (parallel to the
steepness of the ground under the moguls) and down the hill while your body is straight... and on top of the mogul
your skis should reach a point where they are also level and parallel to the steepness of the ground under the
moguls and your body is low, bent at the knees. --The motion of your legs will be like you're pedaling a bicycle
backwards.


If you keep your legs directly under you while you absorb, instead of doing a more circular motion like pedaling a
bike, then what happens is that the resistance of the ski (the stiffness of it) knocks your weight back on the uphill
side of the mogul (then possibly also forward on the downhill side). Your skis will also not stay on the snow if you
don't point them up the fronts and down the backs of moguls, unless they are as flexible as a well cooked noodle.


It's really important to bend at your knees and NOT at your hips. As your butt gets lower while you absorb, you
should not bend the angle of your back forward any more than you have to. In other words, don't let your shoulders
move forward any more than you have to. So how much do you have to? --The minimum amount necessary in order
to not have your weight too far back. The lower you need to absorb, the farther forward the angle of your back
will have to go in order to not have your weight too far back, but always move your back forward the minimum amount
necessary. Absorb mainly with your knees. If you have the angle of your back more forward than it has to be, then
you will not be able to absorb well. Your upper body will get in the way of the motion of your legs.


Your weight needs to be centered, NOT forward like most people say. If you are forward, you will smack your ski tips
and your feet into the moguls and you will not be balanced or smooth. You should also not be too far back with your
weight. Being too far back or forward also messes up the angles of your body. You have to be centered.


How low you need to absorb is determined by the size of the mogul. The amount your feet should be brought up should
be equal to the size of the mogul. A lot of mogul skiers have their skis come off of the ground between moguls. This
can happen for three reasons. Either the mogul skier is absorbing too slowly (he is bringing his feet up too slowly for
the speed he is skiing at) or his timing is off, or he is not absorbing deep enough. The cause of this bouncing could
also be all three reasons (bad timing, slow absorption and shallow absorption together). The faster you ski, the faster
you will need to bring your feet up on the uphill sides of moguls and the faster you'll have to push them down on the
downhill side in order to not come off the ground. It's best to stay on the ground so that you can be smoother. All
mogul skiers try to stay on the ground, but it's not easy at high speeds. You should never jump onto moguls. The
motion of your absorption should be more like pulling up your feet instead of squatting down or lowering your butt.
Imagine hanging from your arms on a pull-up bar and pulling your knees up, instead of doing squats. At high speeds you
pull your feet up and let the mogul pass under you. Your legs straighten when the mogul has passed and is no longer
under you. At lower speeds it's a little more like lowering your butt, at higher speeds it's more like pulling your feet up.


Try to hit the moguls as lightly as possible. Try to not make any noise when you hit them. Most skiers can't do it
quietly, but it's good to try.


Always do what feels natural and balanced, and keep your hands in front of you.

Thanks to everyone for all the replies : ) I will be back to talk more when I have more time. I have been extremely busy
lately. I actually wrote this post at work.
Thanks for your detail explanation.

You are a very good mogul skier. the way you ski the moguls is more like the freestyle way. It seems to me you have a freestyle moguls training background. When you ski off the moguls, you ski more rounder turn, not the freestyle short turn.

Don't you think it's harder to ski rounder turn on the moguls with more edging ( engage the edge earlier ) . It seems to me there is more people skiing very good on the moguls using the freestyle way but very few people can ski the bumps well using the technical way ( earlier edge , round turn but fast close to the freestyle mogul skiers )

There are very few people can ski like the following people, please have patience to watch the whole video since some of them are still using straight skis especially the first guy.

Technical Bumps Moguls Skiing - YouTube

pku 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2012-07-14, 11:11 PM   #7
taichiskiing
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2009-02-07
文章: 3,756
預設 回覆: Hello from Blake Saunders

引用:
作者: Blake 查看文章
Norman asked in his post to explain my way of absorbing...

I have been translating this forum on google, it's not perfect, but I can basically understand everything.

I'll start with a basic explanation and then add my own conclusions about absorption after the first paragraph.
I wish we could have this translated by a professional translator or something. I've written the best explanation
of absorption that I can, I just hope it won't be too hard to understand since I'm writing in English.
Thanks for the detailed explanations; they are well written and quite accurate. Maybe it is a good thing that you don't understand Chinese; the Chinese posting in this thread really nothing more than pointless bitch-fights, I was afraid that you might be leaving in disgust. Thanks for coming back.

引用:
The way to absorb moguls is to bring your knees up towards your chest as your feet hit them. On the uphill side
of the moguls, your feet need to be slightly out in front of you so that your skis can point up the mogul then on
the downhill side of the mogul your skis need to point down the mogul, which means your feet need to be curled
back towards your butt as you straighten your legs. In between moguls your skis point level (parallel to the
steepness of the ground under the moguls) and down the hill while your body is straight... and on top of the mogul
your skis should reach a point where they are also level and parallel to the steepness of the ground under the
moguls and your body is low, bent at the knees. --The motion of your legs will be like you're pedaling a bicycle
backwards.
You are talking about "zipper-line" mogul techniques of course. Maybe I rephrase them a bit to straighten my understanding, while you use "bent at the knees" to absorb the "shocks" when you hit the uphill side of the mogul and straighten the knees somewhat on the downhill side, it appears that you also flex your ankles on the uphill side of the mogul and extend your ankles on the downhill side of the mogul so to keep the skis' contact on the snow to maintain a constant pressure and to the control of the speed, back pedaling a bicycle it is, well said, so there is no argument there. The contention on this board/forum is "how" to "bring your knees up." Could you explain that? (I've said pulling the thigh muscles to bring the knees/feet up, but Norman said it's not (but he wouldn't say how, he has said that is his "secret," to cover what he cannot answer/cannot do, so we call him BS.)

引用:
If you keep your legs directly under you while you absorb, instead of doing a more circular motion like pedaling a
bike, then what happens is that the resistance of the ski (the stiffness of it) knocks your weight back on the uphill
side of the mogul (then possibly also forward on the downhill side). Your skis will also not stay on the snow if you don't point them up the fronts and down the backs of moguls, unless they are as flexible as a well cooked noodle.
The way I see the "absorption" is to reduce the "weight"/pressure that put on the feet/skis. There are two ways to achieve that: 1) the way you do it is what most people called "zipper-line" mogul technique—shorten the distant between the weight/butt and the feet, where "bent knees" reduce the pressure on the feet and straighten the knees to increase the pressure on the feet—and 2) reducing the skis' pressure by skiing a longer distant—a curvier path—so-called "dynamic short turns," which I do. "Flat-skiing," keeping the skis parallel to the slope (as you termed "parallel to the steepness of the ground under the moguls" and to the snow, is what I've called "Flatboarding,"

Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: mogul - YouTube



I think that zipper-line mogul technique is more technical as well as dynamic and elegant way to ski the moguls, but dynamic short turns are easier, thus less exhausting.

引用:
It's really important to bend at your knees and NOT at your hips. As your butt gets lower while you absorb, you
should not bend the angle of your back forward any more than you have to. In other words, don't let your shoulders
move forward any more than you have to. So how much do you have to? --The minimum amount necessary in order
to not have your weight too far back. The lower you need to absorb, the farther forward the angle of your back
will have to go in order to not have your weight too far back, but always move your back forward the minimum amount
necessary. Absorb mainly with your knees. If you have the angle of your back more forward than it has to be, then
you will not be able to absorb well. Your upper body will get in the way of the motion of your legs.

Your weight needs to be centered, NOT forward like most people say. If you are forward, you will smack your ski tips and your feet into the moguls and you will not be balanced or smooth. You should also not be too far back with your weight. Being too far back or forward also messes up the angles of your body. You have to be centered.
In other words, keep the upper body "straight"/upright and as "quiet" as possible, yes. Glad that you still have your "knees," mine can only barely support my weight now, so I use my weight as center, i.e. I move my weight first to maintain balance.

引用:
How low you need to absorb is determined by the size of the mogul. The amount your feet should be brought up should
be equal to the size of the mogul. A lot of mogul skiers have their skis come off of the ground between moguls. This can happen for three reasons. Either the mogul skier is absorbing too slowly (he is bringing his feet up too slowly for the speed he is skiing at) or his timing is off, or he is not absorbing deep enough. The cause of this bouncing could also be all three reasons (bad timing, slow absorption and shallow absorption together). The faster you ski, the faster you will need to bring your feet up on the uphill sides of moguls and the faster you'll have to push them down on the downhill side in order to not come off the ground. It's best to stay on the ground so that you can be smoother. All mogul skiers try to stay on the ground, but it's not easy at high speeds. You should never jump onto moguls.
Well said, but as you said, "it's not easy at high speeds," sometimes jumping off the ground is unavoidable at the high speeds, so learn how to "land" is also a crucial part mogul skiing, as well as skidding to brake.

引用:
The motion of your absorption should be more like pulling up your feet instead of squatting down or lowering your butt.
Well said, this statement answers the question "how to bring your knees up" above.

引用:
Imagine hanging from your arms on a pull-up bar and pulling your knees up, instead of doing squats. At high speeds you
pull your feet up and let the mogul pass under you. Your legs straighten when the mogul has passed and is no longer
under you. At lower speeds it's a little more like lowering your butt, at higher speeds it's more like pulling your feet up.
Norman, this paragraph should answer your question about your La-Ti/拉提, as well as what the second person does on the pull-up bar.

收腳練習.wmv - YouTube



引用:
Try to hit the moguls as lightly as possible. Try to not make any noise when you hit them. Most skiers can't do it
quietly, but it's good to try.

Always do what feels natural and balanced, and keep your hands in front of you.

Thanks to everyone for all the replies : ) I will be back to talk more when I have more time. I have been extremely busy lately. I actually wrote this post at work.
Thanks again for the explanations, no rush, but do please come back soon.

:)
IS
taichiskiing 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2012-08-28, 05:20 PM   #8
beg
滑雪瘋6級
 
註冊日期: 2010-07-10
文章: 2,094
預設 回覆: Hello from Blake Saunders

引用:
作者: taichiskiing 查看文章
Thanks for the detailed explanations; they are well written and quite accurate. Maybe it is a good thing that you don't understand Chinese; the Chinese posting in this thread really nothing more than pointless bitch-fights, I was afraid that you might be leaving in disgust. Thanks for coming back.



:)
IS
Sometimes I agree with taichi, this is a good example of "nothing more than pointless bitch-fights" in chinese and it's all over the forum
引用:
作者: taichiskiing 查看文章
當你小知小人開始“吹毛求疪”的時後,我們都知道你的爭論已經輸到“焦頭爛額口不檡言的地步;早說過,“雪面上飛”/“雪上飛”是“全部”收縮/total absorption的高級技術,不是你小知小技可以理解的,說我“雙腳不平行”更是曝露你小知無知”而証實我所說“你不知道什麼是‘平行’”,所以也証實你不會看照片:一)看不見雪板“平行”雪面?所以跟你說了半天你“雪板外撬”你也不懂,二)膝蓋等高,小腿併攏?那是雪板“平行”的先決條件,三)右腳低左腳高?完全服合饅頭的地形,所以是“全部收縮”,你只是在“雞蛋裡找骨頭”,造成你「瞽盲不視」,你是看不懂我的滑雪的‧




“所以是你在繼續廢話連篇,明明已經沒話可說了,但是卻被你那“三寸不爛之舌牽到牛鼻一樣子不能自主“團團轉”的不能停,確實是很可悲可憐的事‧”

“你要在這論壇上表現你的小知識丟人現臉,請繼續。”

:)
IS

此篇文章於 2012-08-28 05:25 PM 被 beg 編輯。
beg 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2012-08-29, 06:42 AM   #9
Blake
滑雪瘋2級
 
註冊日期: 2012-05-21
文章: 54
預設 回覆: Blake's mogul skiing

Quote from PKU: I am pretty sure you cannot ski like them on the
moguls although you show great bump absorption in your moguls skiing video. I even
doubt if you can ski like them on the groomed. Don't get me wrong that I am saying
your skiing is not good. You are really a strong strong skier but not to the level to
thiose guys.


This is why I have thought about making a video showing myself skiing in different
styles just to prove a point about this argument. This argument can go on forever.

Can you ski proficiently in both styles? Could you put a video up of yourself skiing as
well as me in my style and as well as the guys in your "technical style" video, in their
style? When you can ski in both styles, as well as me in my video, and as well as the
guys in your video, THEN you can argue with me.

You do not need to answer this question. I KNOW you cannot ski well in both styles.
The way I KNOW, is because if you could ski well in both styles then you would not
be arguing with me. You would know that what I am saying is true.

I told you I could make a video of myself skiing equally well in both styles, and I am
not a liar. I said it because it is true. I have not made that video simply because
when I make a video, I like to show my best skiing. I don't want to show myself
skiing the way in your video because I don't like the way it looks. I would not be
happy with myself if I looked like those guys and chose that style as my main style.
I see skiers skiing like that at my resort and I am not impressed. No good skiers that
I know are impressed by that kind of skiing. Most of the skiing world agrees with
me judging by the fact that gold medals in the olympics are won with zipperline skiing.

I have to wonder if you even watched my full videos. There are a lot of shots that
are not mogul shots. There are even a couple on the groomed. Putting a ski on edge
and making round turns is something I have been doing since I was a child. If I wasn't
able to ski like the guys in the "technical style" video I don't think that ANY shot in my
videos would be possible.

If you want to continue to be wrong, then keep believing what you're saying. If you
want to sound like you have NO idea what you are talking about in the sport of skiiing
then ignore what I am telling you.

Any person you have talked to that learned moguls in any form, that says that the round
turn way is harder must not be all that great at zipperline skiing.

I may make the video of myself skiing in different styles this winter, but I might not. One
reason why I might not is that I just don't care that much whether you or anyone like you
has the knowledge necessary to become a good skier. Why should I do you the favor of
proving what's true to you?
---I am already going through a lot of trouble to tell you the truth. It's not my fault if you
refuse to listen and continue to be wrong.
Blake 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2012-08-29, 07:07 AM   #10
Blake
滑雪瘋2級
 
註冊日期: 2012-05-21
文章: 54
預設 回覆: Blake's mogul skiing

I still think that the main difference between what those guys are doing, and the
zipperline style is just the shape of the moguls.

I am tired of talking about myself. Here is a video of mogul skiing that has some of my
friends in it. This is my only video that doesn't have any types of skiing other than
moguls in it. Mark Holley in this video is a really good skier. He can ski the
zipperline style really well and the "technical style" shown in your video is easier for him
too. When my brother is on alpine skis he also finds the "technical style" easier. He and
I are at about the same level on alpine skis. Aaron Peets in this video is another guy who
wouldn't have any trouble with the "technical style". Some of the other less skilled guys
might have some trouble with the "technical style", but that make sense because they also
have some trouble with the zipperline style.

Mogul Riot - YouTube

Blake 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2012-08-29, 01:58 PM   #11
pku
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2010-05-30
文章: 3,645
預設 回覆: Blake's mogul skiing

引用:
作者: Blake 查看文章
Quote from PKU: I am pretty sure you cannot ski like them on the
moguls although you show great bump absorption in your moguls skiing video. I even
doubt if you can ski like them on the groomed. Don't get me wrong that I am saying
your skiing is not good. You are really a strong strong skier but not to the level to
thiose guys.


This is why I have thought about making a video showing myself skiing in different
styles just to prove a point about this argument. This argument can go on forever.

Can you ski proficiently in both styles? Could you put a video up of yourself skiing as
well as me in my style and as well as the guys in your "technical style" video, in their
style? When you can ski in both styles, as well as me in my video, and as well as the
guys in your video, THEN you can argue with me.

You do not need to answer this question. I KNOW you cannot ski well in both styles.
The way I KNOW, is because if you could ski well in both styles then you would not
be arguing with me. You would know that what I am saying is true.

I told you I could make a video of myself skiing equally well in both styles, and I am
not a liar. I said it because it is true. I have not made that video simply because
when I make a video, I like to show my best skiing. I don't want to show myself
skiing the way in your video because I don't like the way it looks. I would not be
happy with myself if I looked like those guys and chose that style as my main style.
I see skiers skiing like that at my resort and I am not impressed. No good skiers that
I know are impressed by that kind of skiing. Most of the skiing world agrees with
me judging by the fact that gold medals in the olympics are won with zipperline skiing.

I have to wonder if you even watched my full videos. There are a lot of shots that
are not mogul shots. There are even a couple on the groomed. Putting a ski on edge
and making round turns is something I have been doing since I was a child. If I wasn't
able to ski like the guys in the "technical style" video I don't think that ANY shot in my
videos would be possible.

If you want to continue to be wrong, then keep believing what you're saying. If you
want to sound like you have NO idea what you are talking about in the sport of skiiing
then ignore what I am telling you.

Any person you have talked to that learned moguls in any form, that says that the round
turn way is harder must not be all that great at zipperline skiing.

I may make the video of myself skiing in different styles this winter, but I might not. One
reason why I might not is that I just don't care that much whether you or anyone like you
has the knowledge necessary to become a good skier. Why should I do you the favor of
proving what's true to you?
---I am already going through a lot of trouble to tell you the truth. It's not my fault if you
refuse to listen and continue to be wrong.
As I said before, you are quite a strong skier and you ski pretty fast on moguls. But right now you are comparing your skiing technique with the top Technical skiers in Japan and Austria. then it's a completely different story. Even Harald Hard also get inspired by those guys skiing but I don't think he'll get inspired by your skiing. You can put your skiing to the Epic to compare with those guys and see what other people said. The way you ski on the moguls is fast but in alpine skiing technique, it consider no performance at all. If you don't know what is performance skiing or technical skiing, you can ask the guy on Epic.

Also on your video you mark it technical terrain skiing. Your skiing show excellent bump absorption technique on moguls. Once you are off the moguls, you didn't ski as smooth and you can't control the pressure of you ski well and it doesn't look smooth enough. Your skis chatter quite a bit. The energy restore by edging the skis with speed is not as easy to handle as you think you can.

You don't really ski as good as you think when you are off the moguls because your edging and pressure control technique is not quite there. That's why I am sure that you can't ski like those guys.





Austrian Mogul Skiing - YouTube


Mogul Riot - YouTube


Super Slow Skiing - Mogul - YouTube


此篇文章於 2012-08-29 02:13 PM 被 pku 編輯。
pku 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2012-07-15, 09:42 AM   #12
Blake
滑雪瘋2級
 
註冊日期: 2012-05-21
文章: 54
預設 回覆: Hello from Blake Saunders

I think that what I said about how to absorb is true both in zipperlines and out of them.
It's even true if you are skiing groomed or trees and hit just one bump.

From pku: Don't you think it's harder to ski rounder turn on the moguls with more edging ( engage the edge earlier ) .

No. I want to be very clear about this. The answer is No.

I have heard a lot of arguments about this kind of thing ever since I started
getting online. A lot of people try to say that it is harder to ski outside of a line
than in one, or that rounder turns are harder than turns made in a line. These
ideas are completely wrong. I had never heard anyone say these things until I
started getting online. The people who say these things are not very good skiers.
If they were good skiers, they would know that what they are saying is not true.
If they were truly good skiers, they would not think that skiing outside of a line
or making rounder turns is as difficult as they say it is. The fact that they
think it's so difficult to make round turns, or to ski outside of a line proves that
they lack skiing ability. They wouldn't say this if they had a lot of skiing ability.
I think that a lot of people that say these things are just trying to argue to
convince people that they are great skiers when they are not.

Whenever I teach a beginner mogul skier, they have usually learned to ski moguls
outside of a zipperline first before I start teaching them. I have to work with
them to get them to be able to ski in a line. Skiing outside of a line (which
involves rounder turns) is step one. Step two is skiing in a line.

The truth about this question is that in most cases if a skier is bad outside of a
line then that skier will probably also ski bad in one. But if a skier is bad in a line
it is possible that the skier could still ski good out of one (or with round turns in
the moguls). A skier that can ski good out of a line but not ski good in one is a
lot more common than a skier who is good in a line but not good out of one.
Therefore, skiing in a line is harder. I can ski with round turns out of lines or in
lines or whatever… the style I show in my videos is the most difficult and that is
why it is in my videos.

Skiing outside of a line and skiing with round turns in the moguls is kind of the
same thing. That is why I am explaining this in the way I am.

To be truly great in the moguls, you have to be able to make other kinds of turns well
outside of the moguls. The opposite is not true though. Olympic racers like Lindsay
Vonn do not need to be able to ski moguls well in order to be good racers. Usually
racers cannot ski bump lines.

If you look at the video you posted, several times in the video the skier stops
making round turns and starts skiing in the zipperline. When the skier does that
his skis do not stay on the snow. He is bouncing a lot. So his round turns are
better than his zipperline turns. He's also not very good at round turns though
because he can't even stay on the snow while he's making them. The guys are
usually not very smooth no matter what shape of turn they're making.

I think these guys are basically skiing the zipperline anyway... the round shape
of their turns is because they are on weird shaped, long moguls. These moguls
are really big and spread out. If I was on moguls that shape, my turns would
be longer and rounder too, because of the shape of the bumps.
Technical Bumps Moguls Skiing - YouTube


From pku It seems to me there is more people skiing very good on the moguls using the freestyle way but very few people can ski the bumps well using the technical way ( earlier edge , round turn but fast close to the freestyle mogul skiers )
I think most people don't want to learn to ski like those guys in the video above because
they don't like the way it looks as much as the freestyle way. I think less people
are doing it just because less people are interested in doing it that way. I am not sure if
there are a lot of people doing it the freestyle way, but I will say this... Machine-made
moguls should not count as moguls in my opinion. If you are talking about freestyle skiers
who ski machine-made moguls, I do not think that they are mogul skiers at all because
I think moguls cannot be machine-made if they are supposed to count as moguls.

--The way to pull up your feet in the moguls is to use your abdominals like the video of the guy with his feet hanging in the gym.
Blake 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2012-07-15, 02:23 PM   #13
norman
滑雪瘋鑽石級
 
norman 的頭像
 
註冊日期: 2008-09-24
文章: 11,008
發送 MSN 訊息給 norman 發送 Skype™ 訊息給 norman
預設 回覆: Hello from Blake Saunders

引用:
作者: Blake 查看文章
I think that what I said about how to absorb is true both in zipperlines and out of them.
It's even true if you are skiing groomed or trees and hit just one bump.

From pku: Don't you think it's harder to ski rounder turn on the moguls with more edging ( engage the edge earlier ) .

No. I want to be very clear about this. The answer is No.

I have heard a lot of arguments about this kind of thing ever since I started
getting online. A lot of people try to say that it is harder to ski outside of a line
than in one, or that rounder turns are harder than turns made in a line. These
ideas are completely wrong. I had never heard anyone say these things until I
started getting online. The people who say these things are not very good skiers.
If they were good skiers, they would know that what they are saying is not true.
If they were truly good skiers, they would not think that skiing outside of a line
or making rounder turns is as difficult as they say it is. The fact that they
think it's so difficult to make round turns, or to ski outside of a line proves that
they lack skiing ability. They wouldn't say this if they had a lot of skiing ability.
I think that a lot of people that say these things are just trying to argue to
convince people that they are great skiers when they are not.

Whenever I teach a beginner mogul skier, they have usually learned to ski moguls
outside of a zipperline first before I start teaching them. I have to work with
them to get them to be able to ski in a line. Skiing outside of a line (which
involves rounder turns) is step one. Step two is skiing in a line.

The truth about this question is that in most cases if a skier is bad outside of a
line then that skier will probably also ski bad in one. But if a skier is bad in a line
it is possible that the skier could still ski good out of one (or with round turns in
the moguls). A skier that can ski good out of a line but not ski good in one is a
lot more common than a skier who is good in a line but not good out of one.
Therefore, skiing in a line is harder. I can ski with round turns out of lines or in
lines or whatever… the style I show in my videos is the most difficult and that is
why it is in my videos.


Skiing outside of a line and skiing with round turns in the moguls is kind of the
same thing. That is why I am explaining this in the way I am.

To be truly great in the moguls, you have to be able to make other kinds of turns well
outside of the moguls. The opposite is not true though. Olympic racers like Lindsay
Vonn do not need to be able to ski moguls well in order to be good racers. Usually
racers cannot ski bump lines.

If you look at the video you posted, several times in the video the skier stops
making round turns and starts skiing in the zipperline. When the skier does that
his skis do not stay on the snow. He is bouncing a lot. So his round turns are
better than his zipperline turns. He's also not very good at round turns though
because he can't even stay on the snow while he's making them. The guys are
usually not very smooth no matter what shape of turn they're making.

I think these guys are basically skiing the zipperline anyway... the round shape
of their turns is because they are on weird shaped, long moguls. These moguls
are really big and spread out. If I was on moguls that shape, my turns would
be longer and rounder too, because of the shape of the bumps.
Technical Bumps Moguls Skiing - YouTube

From pku It seems to me there is more people skiing very good on the moguls using the freestyle way but very few people can ski the bumps well using the technical way ( earlier edge , round turn but fast close to the freestyle mogul skiers )
I think most people don't want to learn to ski like those guys in the video above because
they don't like the way it looks as much as the freestyle way. I think less people
are doing it just because less people are interested in doing it that way. I am not sure if
there are a lot of people doing it the freestyle way, but I will say this... Machine-made
moguls should not count as moguls in my opinion. If you are talking about freestyle skiers
who ski machine-made moguls, I do not think that they are mogul skiers at all because
I think moguls cannot be machine-made if they are supposed to count as moguls.

--The way to pull up your feet in the moguls is to use your abdominals like the video of the guy with his feet hanging in the gym.
Hi Blake:

Good clear answer.

One more questions for their.

How is your any feeling when you skiing on mogul fast down hill?

Are you easy tired of legs?

Or real relaxed and can ski on mogul very long way?

Or...?
__________________
目前總滑天數74天。繼續累積中...我想滑雪。

滑雪人
norman 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2012-07-19, 08:35 AM   #14
pku
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2010-05-30
文章: 3,645
預設 回覆: Hello from Blake Saunders

引用:
作者: Blake 查看文章
I think that what I said about how to absorb is true both in zipperlines and out of them.
It's even true if you are skiing groomed or trees and hit just one bump.

From pku: Don't you think it's harder to ski rounder turn on the moguls with more edging ( engage the edge earlier ) .

No. I want to be very clear about this. The answer is No.

I have heard a lot of arguments about this kind of thing ever since I started
getting online. A lot of people try to say that it is harder to ski outside of a line
than in one, or that rounder turns are harder than turns made in a line. These
ideas are completely wrong. I had never heard anyone say these things until I
started getting online. The people who say these things are not very good skiers.
If they were good skiers, they would know that what they are saying is not true.
If they were truly good skiers, they would not think that skiing outside of a line
or making rounder turns is as difficult as they say it is. The fact that they
think it's so difficult to make round turns, or to ski outside of a line proves that
they lack skiing ability. They wouldn't say this if they had a lot of skiing ability.
I think that a lot of people that say these things are just trying to argue to
convince people that they are great skiers when they are not.

Whenever I teach a beginner mogul skier, they have usually learned to ski moguls
outside of a zipperline first before I start teaching them. I have to work with
them to get them to be able to ski in a line. Skiing outside of a line (which
involves rounder turns) is step one. Step two is skiing in a line.

The truth about this question is that in most cases if a skier is bad outside of a
line then that skier will probably also ski bad in one. But if a skier is bad in a line
it is possible that the skier could still ski good out of one (or with round turns in
the moguls). A skier that can ski good out of a line but not ski good in one is a
lot more common than a skier who is good in a line but not good out of one.
Therefore, skiing in a line is harder. I can ski with round turns out of lines or in
lines or whatever… the style I show in my videos is the most difficult and that is
why it is in my videos.

Skiing outside of a line and skiing with round turns in the moguls is kind of the
same thing. That is why I am explaining this in the way I am.

To be truly great in the moguls, you have to be able to make other kinds of turns well
outside of the moguls. The opposite is not true though. Olympic racers like Lindsay
Vonn do not need to be able to ski moguls well in order to be good racers. Usually
racers cannot ski bump lines.

If you look at the video you posted, several times in the video the skier stops
making round turns and starts skiing in the zipperline. When the skier does that
his skis do not stay on the snow. He is bouncing a lot. So his round turns are
better than his zipperline turns. He's also not very good at round turns though
because he can't even stay on the snow while he's making them. The guys are
usually not very smooth no matter what shape of turn they're making.

I think these guys are basically skiing the zipperline anyway... the round shape
of their turns is because they are on weird shaped, long moguls. These moguls
are really big and spread out. If I was on moguls that shape, my turns would
be longer and rounder too, because of the shape of the bumps.
Technical Bumps Moguls Skiing - YouTube

From pku It seems to me there is more people skiing very good on the moguls using the freestyle way but very few people can ski the bumps well using the technical way ( earlier edge , round turn but fast close to the freestyle mogul skiers )
I think most people don't want to learn to ski like those guys in the video above because
they don't like the way it looks as much as the freestyle way. I think less people
are doing it just because less people are interested in doing it that way. I am not sure if
there are a lot of people doing it the freestyle way, but I will say this... Machine-made
moguls should not count as moguls in my opinion. If you are talking about freestyle skiers
who ski machine-made moguls, I do not think that they are mogul skiers at all because
I think moguls cannot be machine-made if they are supposed to count as moguls.

--The way to pull up your feet in the moguls is to use your abdominals like the video of the guy with his feet hanging in the gym.

I think you misunderstand my question or I didn't make it clear enough.

I am asking about the way of skiing, not the line of one chooses. As you said, some of the guys in the video still ski the zipper line. The main difference between you and them is they are always trying to be on edges and you are always on flat skis. They are skiing on arcs but you are more of a straight lines

The way those guys ski on the video is consider the technical way and they current and former demonstrators ( members in their country's demo team to attend the Interski events) of Japan and Austria.
pku 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2012-07-15, 11:02 PM   #15
taichiskiing
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2009-02-07
文章: 3,756
預設 回覆: Hello from Blake Saunders

引用:
作者: Blake 查看文章

--The way to pull up your feet in the moguls is to use your abdominals like the video of the guy with his feet hanging in the gym.
Yes, using the abdomen muscles is the correct "whole" body movement on moguls, however, abdomen muscles do not connect to the feet, so the questions remain open, how do you "pull up the feet," or "bring your knees up towards your chest"?

And do these photos look using the abdomen muscles to absorb, or "bring the knees up toward the chest" to you?





And do you think that this skier skis/absorbs like you?

收縮轉彎.mpg - YouTube



:)
IS
taichiskiing 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2012-07-26, 01:51 PM   #16
taichiskiing
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2009-02-07
文章: 3,756
預設 回覆: Blake's mogul skiing

引用:
作者: norman 查看文章
「You should never jump onto moguls. The motion of your absorption should be more like pulling up your feet instead of squatting down or lowering your butt.」
Just because you can "copy&paste" Blake's words doesn't mean you know what is saying in what you've quoted. I'm not here to bash Blake just because you try to steal/ride on his words to boast about yourself; nevertheless, mogulists jump on the moguls all the times,

Moguls—Lines and Creativity on Vimeo



and the way they ski moguls are not any lesser than Blake's, and what Blake said "squatting down or lowering your butt" is not the same as your“不跳不蹲的收縮”/"no jumping no squatting absorption"; that's only your poor interpretations. What you've praised "straightlining down the mogul field",

收腳練習.wmv - YouTube



is not the same as Blake's "zipperline" mogul technique,

2012 High Level Mogul Skiing and Steep Skiing モーグル - YouTube



Compare to yourself, your are not even touching the perimeter.

收縮轉彎.mpg - YouTube



Your are only plagiarizing.

:)
IS
taichiskiing 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2012-07-26, 03:02 PM   #17
norman
滑雪瘋鑽石級
 
norman 的頭像
 
註冊日期: 2008-09-24
文章: 11,008
發送 MSN 訊息給 norman 發送 Skype™ 訊息給 norman
預設 回覆: Blake's mogul skiing

引用:
作者: taichiskiing 查看文章
Just because you can "copy&paste" Blake's words doesn't mean you know what is saying in what you've quoted. I'm not here to bash Blake just because you try to steal/ride on his words to boast about yourself; nevertheless, mogulists jump on the moguls all the times,

Moguls—Lines and Creativity on Vimeo


and the way they ski moguls are not any lesser than Blake's, and what Blake said "squatting down or lowering your butt" is not the same as your“不跳不蹲的收縮”/"no jumping no squatting absorption"; that's only your poor interpretations. What you've praised "straightlining down the mogul field",

收腳練習.wmv - YouTube


is not the same as Blake's "zipperline" mogul technique,

2012 High Level Mogul Skiing and Steep Skiing モーグル - YouTube


Compare to yourself, your are not even touching the perimeter.

收縮轉彎.mpg - YouTube


Your are only plagiarizing.

:)
IS
這裏沒有一段影片是你自己的,你想證明怎麼?

另外,Blake的方法跟Bob的方法是有一些差別的,你分不清楚又把Bob的影片放進來說,沒看到我都懶得去你發的另一個新討論串跟你講了。

簡單的說,在我的方法,下面這2段,確實是符合不蹲不跳的拉提收縮,你只是希望從Blake說出確定的答案而已。

你有哪一個動作是不蹲不跳的收縮動作?說來你更像是抄襲Bob跟Blake的影片來說自己會這個動作。

收縮轉彎.mpg - YouTube


拉提收縮雙腳的動作 - YouTube

__________________
目前總滑天數74天。繼續累積中...我想滑雪。

滑雪人
norman 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2012-07-27, 12:53 AM   #18
taichiskiing
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2009-02-07
文章: 3,756
預設 回覆: Blake's mogul skiing

引用:
作者: norman 查看文章
這裏沒有一段影片是你自己的,你想證明怎麼?
Bob's video is enough to prove that your "no jumping no squatting absorption" is not the "zipperline" mogul technique/"Avalement."

引用:
另外,Blake的方法跟Bob的方法是有一些差別的,你分不清楚又把Bob的影片放進來說,沒看到我都懶得去你發的另一個新討論串跟你講了。
Bob's video has covered larger area of "absorption," which includes Blake's method, so it covers yours as well. You don't participate discussing in my new thread is not because you don't bother with but you don't have enough knowledge to follow up, and don't dare to face your own inferior little knowledge.

引用:
簡單的說,在我的方法,下面這2段,確實是符合不蹲不跳的拉提收縮,你只是希望從Blake說出確定的答案而已。
No, Blake has never talked about his method is "no jumping no squatting absorption," as I've said in last post, that's only your inadequate interpretation to "gold-plate your own face." To say what you do in the following video clips like Blake's way of ski moguls is only your delusions.

引用:
你有哪一個動作是不蹲不跳的收縮動作?說來你更像是抄襲Bob跟Blake的影片來說自己會這個動作。
No, I didn't say I was doing the "zipperline" technique, nor "no jumping no squatting absorption," but simply "absorption." "No jumping no squatting absorption"/zipperline technique may be your "holy grail" but not mine; it is you who have said that you are doing the zipperline mogul technique as you try to prove in the following video clips, and you don't know that only prove you cannot do it, as well as you don't know what you're talking about.

收縮轉彎.mpg - YouTube



Guess this clip only Blake can answer whether or not your way of ski like his zipperline technique.

拉提收縮雙腳的動作 - YouTube



And no, that is not an "absorption" move, nor Blake's "bring your knees up toward your chest." Repeating your incomplete clips doesn't mean that it shows you know how to do "absorption," but only makes yourself a joke.

:)
IS

Ps. I'm writing this in English only so that Blake may read it (I thought it is the purpose why the admin01 separating this thread from the original for), so he is aware of what's going on here, if he bothers to return.
taichiskiing 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2012-07-27, 09:30 AM   #19
norman
滑雪瘋鑽石級
 
norman 的頭像
 
註冊日期: 2008-09-24
文章: 11,008
發送 MSN 訊息給 norman 發送 Skype™ 訊息給 norman
預設 回覆: Blake's mogul skiing

引用:
作者: taichiskiing 查看文章
Bob's video is enough to prove that your "no jumping no squatting absorption" is not the "zipperline" mogul technique/"Avalement."



Bob's video has covered larger area of "absorption," which includes Blake's method, so it covers yours as well. You don't participate discussing in my new thread is not because you don't bother with but you don't have enough knowledge to follow up, and don't dare to face your own inferior little knowledge.



No, Blake has never talked about his method is "no jumping no squatting absorption," as I've said in last post, that's only your inadequate interpretation to "gold-plate your own face." To say what you do in the following video clips like Blake's way of ski moguls is only your delusions.



No, I didn't say I was doing the "zipperline" technique, nor "no jumping no squatting absorption," but simply "absorption." "No jumping no squatting absorption"/zipperline technique may be your "holy grail" but not mine; it is you who have said that you are doing the zipperline mogul technique as you try to prove in the following video clips, and you don't know that only prove you cannot do it, as well as you don't know what you're talking about.

收縮轉彎.mpg - YouTube


Guess this clip only Blake can answer whether or not your way of ski like his zipperline technique.

拉提收縮雙腳的動作 - YouTube


And no, that is not an "absorption" move, nor Blake's "bring your knees up toward your chest." Repeating your incomplete clips doesn't mean that it shows you know how to do "absorption," but only makes yourself a joke.

:)
IS

Ps. I'm writing this in English only so that Blake may read it (I thought it is the purpose why the admin01 separating this thread from the original for), so he is aware of what's going on here, if he bothers to return.
我簡單回應,引用Blake說過的話回應你就好了。這裏是在討論Blake的方法,不是Bob的方法。

引用:
作者: Blake 查看文章
You should never jump onto moguls. The
motion of your absorption should be more like pulling up your feet instead of squatting down or lowering your butt.

Imagine hanging from your arms on a pull-up bar and pulling your knees up, instead of doing squats. At high speeds you
pull your feet up and let the mogul pass under you. Your legs straighten when the mogul has passed and is no longer
under you. At lower speeds it's a little more like lowering your butt, at higher speeds it's more like pulling your feet up.
__________________
目前總滑天數74天。繼續累積中...我想滑雪。

滑雪人
norman 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2012-07-27, 11:43 PM   #20
taichiskiing
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2009-02-07
文章: 3,756
預設 回覆: Blake's mogul skiing

引用:
作者: norman 查看文章
我簡單回應,引用Blake說過的話回應你就好了。這裏是在討論Blake的方法,不是Bob的方法。

引用:
作者: Blake 查看文章
You should never jump onto moguls. The motion of your absorption should be more like pulling up your feet instead of squatting down or lowering your butt.
Imagine hanging from your arms on a pull-up bar and pulling your knees up, instead of doing squats. At high speeds you
pull your feet up and let the mogul pass under you. Your legs straighten when the mogul has passed and is no longer
under you. At lower speeds it's a little more like lowering your butt, at higher speeds it's more like pulling your feet up.
What about it? "Just because you can "copy&paste" Blake's words doesn't mean you know what is saying in what you've quoted." What you've missed is what you have not colored it red,

"Imagine hanging from your arms on a pull-up bar and pulling your knees up, instead of doing squats."

Although you've talked extensively about "La-Ti"/"pull-up the feet" but you've never really understand what it is meant, so you cannot do it, and so is your interpretation "no jumping no squatting absorption"—wrong, and you continue to use this failed argument won't take you and your skiing skills anywhere but prove yourself an idiot who doesn't know when and how to concede that you have long lost your arguments, and that's where you "can't learn, and cannot progress" comes from. You are only plagiarizing Blake's words to boast yourself, and only make a joke out of yourself.

:)
IS
taichiskiing 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
回覆

書籤

主題工具
顯示模式

發文規則
不可以發表新主題
不可以發表回覆
不可以上傳附件
不可以編輯自己的文章

啟用 BB 代碼
論壇啟用 表情符號
論壇啟用 [IMG] 代碼
論壇禁用 HTML 代碼


所有時間均為台北時間。現在的時間是 02:01 AM


Powered by vBulletin® 版本 3.7.4
版權所有 ©2000 - 2018,Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.