滑雪人論壇  

返回   滑雪人論壇 > 滑雪技術討論區 > 雙板Ski > Ski技術討論區

Ski技術討論區 管他是好咖還是怪咖,只要是咖就能發言,有任何技術問題,在此討論就對啦。

回覆
 
主題工具 顯示模式
舊 2015-04-25, 12:43 PM   #401
taichiskiing
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2009-02-07
文章: 3,756
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

引用:
作者: B2L2 查看文章
It was you who claimed with all-else-equal, "the longer the turn radius the faster the speed". And people proved it wrong there.
No one has proved me wrong, (actually, no one can, as my theory is correct,) so, that is your shameless lie.

引用:
And it was also you who claimed that you could prove all your knowledge/theory correct by Math/Sci. And I said if one could be proved by Math/Sci, I don't need to go experience that myself.
You are wrong again, I've said that you can only prove the “true” knowledge in two ways: by Math/Sci way or holistic way, and you know neither ways.

引用:
And just to answer your question, I could ski a short radius turn fast and slow and I could also ski a long radius turn fast and slow. And in each turn, the centripetal force is different, yes. But no where I could draw a BS conclusion like you and simply said "the longer the turn radius the faster the speed".
Maybe that's your “turn skiing” have ways to scrap the speed during the turns, but no, to narrow down the variables, just say to ski the fastest way you can on both long turns and short turns, your long turn speed will be faster than your short turn's. Your inept doesn't shed the light.

引用:
You just like to keep whining. When we said our words/knowledge, you said we are wrong. When we quote other people words/knowledge, you complained we quoted our people's knowledge. Why you always put other people in doubt and never (never ever) put doubt in yourself?
What you choose to quote [to show off] is to base on your knowledge, so when you quote a wrong subject it does mean that you either don't know or don't understand the subject enough. I don't put people in doubt, I always double check my words, and I always have proofs to what I say, and you are in my proof.

引用:
I'm not here to answer this question. I'm here to prove you wrong. But knowing what's my definition didn't make your theory right. We could make a new topic for that when I feel like it.
If you don't know your definition, that is to say, you don't know the answer neither, then how can you prove me wrong? No, you can't; you don't know what you are talking about, then my theory is not reachable by your thinking, so you cannot prove either way. If you think that you're doing it, you are bullshiting yourself.

引用:
You asked "whether or not that spinning object has a KE", you forgot? And that's my answer to your question. Rotational energy could also be called as angular kinetic energy.
No, that is not an answer, but your plagiarizing other's materials, and you fail to mention the “circular motion.”

引用:
Have you figured out what is linear and what is non-linear yet? If you don't know and understand common teams, you don't have much room to prove yourself right.

You still cannot pin point what's wrong with my interpretation. And Wikipedia isn't mine.
Yes, in math, linear is one dimensional; nevertheless, the question is, have you figure out what “one dimension” means? All objects travel in this universe are considered as “linear montion,” and yes, even it is as "wide" as the earth orbit. Your small domain (Wikipedia) is inadequate.

引用:
You indeed a good example. Don't need to say thanks to yourself.
Yup, no need to thank me, you are what you do, so being called.

:)
IS
taichiskiing 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2015-04-26, 12:19 PM   #402
B2L2
滑雪瘋3級
 
註冊日期: 2011-03-04
文章: 346
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

First, if you believe you are always right, you are BSing yourself.

I don't see any new info other than you bad monthing. If that's all you have to say, you already lost the whole discussion. If you still have anything new to discuss, I don't mind to continue on.
B2L2 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2015-04-26, 10:49 PM   #403
taichiskiing
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2009-02-07
文章: 3,756
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

Is that how you “stick with math/sci”? you are a joke.

引用:
作者: B2L2 查看文章
First, if you believe you are always right, you are BSing yourself.
You should have heeded your own advice. No, I don't just believe I'm always right, I prove all my words, yes, I am always right; otherwise, you will not hear them. Yes, that little discipline does go a long way.

引用:
I don't see any new info other than you bad monthing. If that's all you have to say, you already lost the whole discussion. If you still have anything new to discuss, I don't mind to continue on.
You can declare that you are winning and tuck your tail and run, but my info remains true.

:)
IS
taichiskiing 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2015-04-28, 08:01 AM   #404
B2L2
滑雪瘋3級
 
註冊日期: 2011-03-04
文章: 346
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

You have been proven to be wrong so many times just in this thread. U got definition wrong, you used the formula wrong even in the first message. If you failed to understand or accept the truth, it is up to u. It doesn't harm me at all. Your definitions of many things are obviously different then other people living in this bigger world.

All your name calling is just reflecting how little you see yourself. If u like to live in your own little world, no one is stopping u. It doesn't bother me.

If u are serious to continue talking about math/sci, I don't mind to continue. If u want to continue brashing people to prevent any more discussion, I could only say you failed to prove anything at all.
B2L2 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2015-04-28, 11:30 AM   #405
taichiskiing
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2009-02-07
文章: 3,756
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

“Is that how you “stick with math/sci”? you are a joke.”

引用:
作者: B2L2 查看文章
You have been proven to be wrong so many times just in this thread. it is up to u. It doesn't harm me at all. Your definitions of many things are obviously different then other people living in this bigger world.
“Your cheating heart,” not that you have not proved me wrong, you don't even know how to talk things “scientifically,” while I have proved that you are math/physics/sci illiterate, you cannot even answer my rebuttals, that's to say, yes, I have totally “destroyed” your arguments; you can only slip into you gapper's shameless permanent denials. And no, if other people have “different definitions of many things”from my/scientific definitions, they don't live in a bigger world, but actually a small world, especially, when they most likely be wrong as well. Science describes the most accurate and the largest physical world.

引用:
All your name calling is just reflecting how little you see yourself. If u like to live in your own little world, no one is stopping u. It doesn't bother me.
What you call my “name-calling,” I call it “a matter of fact,” that is, TRUTH. “If the shoes fit, wear it, you entitle to.” If you whistler group like to live like “爬蟲類”, by all means, your prerogative, it doesn't bother me, I only point out to obvious.

引用:
If u are serious to continue talking about math/sci, I don't mind to continue. If u want to continue brashing people to prevent any more discussion, I could only say you failed to prove anything at all.
No, I'm not interesting to talk about math/sci with you, “you are [proven] math/physics/sci illiterate,” but if you sincerely want to talk about “skiing,”—“what is “higher peroformance” in skiing, etc.,”—I'm all ears. And no, your denial doesn't bother me,” you only prove yourself as what I said. Thanks for proving it.

:)
IS
taichiskiing 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2015-04-28, 03:49 PM   #406
B2L2
滑雪瘋3級
 
註冊日期: 2011-03-04
文章: 346
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

Okay, if you're not interested to talk about math/sci, that's fine. Why you have to be so emotional? You have something bad to hide?? Or that's your usual old trick to shut people off and claim to win an argument?

You said your group has some professional. You don't have anyone with a sci degree to proof read your theory and formula? It is really shamefully not able to prove something that simple. Calling curve as linear and still insist that, you may be the first person.

Want to discuss what's high performance skiing? Sure, when I feel like it. I could tell you a little bit first, your skiing has nothing related to my personal definition of "high performance" skiing. Of course, I know you don't care about my definition (like how I don't care about yours but still manage to get you finally agreed that with same KE, there is still performance difference).

You could name other people using whatever term/name you name. But since you are able to talk and chat with these person, it rendered you into the same level as well. I never name you as anything non-human. Yes, I call you as an old man and that's all. I played my respect as you being a human being, which I did my part. Your life is full of hate and you gained that yourself.
B2L2 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2015-04-28, 10:29 PM   #407
taichiskiing
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2009-02-07
文章: 3,756
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

引用:
作者: B2L2 查看文章
Okay, if you're not interested to talk about math/sci, that's fine. Why you have to be so emotional? You have something bad to hide?? Or that's your usual old trick to shut people off and claim to win an argument?
No, that's your emotion, my “scientific” proofs, adhere to the math/physics/scientific principles, have no emotion. I didn't shut you off, but have “proved” that you are a loser. The longer you stay, the bigger loser you get.

引用:
You said your group has some professional. You don't have anyone with a sci degree to proof read your theory and formula? It is really shamefully not able to prove something that simple. Calling curve as linear and still insist that, you may be the first person.
Yes, a curve is linear, if you know what “one dimension” means, and that is one of my proofs that you are math/physics/sci illiterate. Go find some people with sci degree to get some tutoring first; nevertheless, it may take you another thirty years to reach my proficiency level, you are way way way behind.

引用:
Want to discuss what's high performance skiing? Sure, when I feel like it. I could tell you a little bit first, your skiing has nothing related to my personal definition of "high performance" skiing. Of course, I know you don't care about my definition (like how I don't care about yours but still manage to get you finally agreed that with same KE, there is still performance difference).
I have said that you may not know what "high performance" skiing is if you cannot define it at the first place, and you have yet to answer my question. What you “don't care” is not a scientific argument but your “emotion” that on your side is good and not on your side is bad, yeah, classic “四惡四,” ain't worth the thought. And no, you are still confused about “performance” with “maneuverability.”

Korean War Dogfighting: The most INTENSE Dogfights of the Korean War! - YouTube



引用:
You could name other people using whatever term/name you name. But since you are able to talk and chat with these person, it rendered you into the same level as well. I never name you as anything non-human. Yes, I call you as an old man and that's all. I played my respect as you being a human being, which I did my part. Your life is full of hate and you gained that yourself.
“You are what you do,” is not “what you call me” but your actions that counts, your words are虛偽, which does mean that you lack of “self respect,” and on this forum you whistler group show lack of respect to others as well.「君子坦蕩蕩,小人長戚戚」,I have done nothing to you whistler group, yet your group even stalking me from hkssa to here to bashing me, yeah, it is you are “full of hate and you gained that yourself,”actually, I've spotted you whistler group's fake from the day one, with your group's beg1, beg2, and beg3 handles, a bunch of “自鳴清高”“沽名釣譽”的“鄉愿”‧And thanks to you whistler group's challenging, I did gain quite a bit, by practicing to confirm my moves, I ski much smoother and precise now than before.

Heavenly skiing: one more run with Guy - YouTube



And you gappers are still stuck in the denials.

:)
IS
taichiskiing 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2015-04-29, 10:53 AM   #408
norman
滑雪瘋隕石級
 
norman 的頭像
 
註冊日期: 2008-09-24
文章: 12,242
發送 MSN 訊息給 norman 發送 Skype™ 訊息給 norman
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

引用:
作者: taichiskiing 查看文章
你們兩個人動作都有問題。變換轉彎方向的效能都不行。整理好的滑道看起來似流暢ok,但一到稍困難的地形時,變化轉彎方向的效率就出問題了,身體會跟不上地形的變化,只能降低速度來跟上自己的變化速度,而這速度越慢,就代表變換效率越差,這是改變不了的事實。
__________________
目前總滑天數80天。繼續累積中...我想滑雪。

滑雪人
norman 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2015-04-29, 12:36 PM   #409
B2L2
滑雪瘋3級
 
註冊日期: 2011-03-04
文章: 346
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

I'm qualify to be your sci/math tutor. I had my sci degree 20 some years ago with a honor. Too bad its not up to define my standard in the world I'm living at.

In your little own world u could call A=B no matter what they are. It just mean nothing once outside of your little world since no one care about what you said.

Curve in a 1D world, you go hire a tutor. I'm not interested to teach you since your would not listen. Come live in my 4D world since its way bigger than your no-D world where everything equal to nothing.
B2L2 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2015-04-29, 09:33 PM   #410
taichiskiing
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2009-02-07
文章: 3,756
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

引用:
作者: B2L2 查看文章
I'm qualify to be your sci/math tutor. I had my sci degree 20 some years ago with a honor. Too bad its not up to define my standard in the world I'm living at.
“You are a joke,” when you cannot even answer my rebuttals what can you tutor me? You may have your “honor” then, but you sure have lost that glory notion on your way growing up, what a waste of a good education. Based on your continue shameless arguing “illogically,” I'm pretty sure you are NOT a scientific person, so, what “sci” degree you were studied in? Social science? Yeah, 你們弱慢族的人都是“廟小身大”。

引用:
In your little own world u could call A=B no matter what they are. It just mean nothing once outside of your little world since no one care about what you said.
Probably you really don't know, your “illogical” reasoning shows; no “logical” person would come out with an argument like yours, “call A=B no matter what they are,” you are “logic” illiterate too.

引用:
Curve in a 1D world, you go hire a tutor. I'm not interested to teach you since your would not listen. Come live in my 4D world since its way bigger than your no-D world where everything equal to nothing.
“I'm not interested to teach you since your would not listen,” right, that's what I would say, and that's why I don't want to talk about math/physics/sci with you, you are too low key, you know about math/physics/sci like norman knows about skiing. In my world, all “lines” are 1D, all “areas” are 2D, and all “cubes” are 3D, so yes, “curve” is a 1D world, what is your 3D world? What is your 4D world? My world is 5D, 4D + a spiritual world, and for you little knowledge information, “no-D”—Unism (一元), a state of Buddha, if you know what that means—totally beyond you “ordinary people” (凡人) comprehension, is the “largest” world of them all. You are just playing your lips.

:)
IS
taichiskiing 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2015-04-30, 09:32 AM   #411
pku
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2010-05-30
文章: 3,787
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

引用:
作者: taichiskiing 查看文章
“You are a joke,” when you cannot even answer my rebuttals what can you tutor me? You may have your “honor” then, but you sure have lost that glory notion on your way growing up, what a waste of a good education. Based on your continue shameless arguing “illogically,” I'm pretty sure you are NOT a scientific person, so, what “sci” degree you were studied in? Social science? Yeah, 你們弱慢族的人都是“廟小身大”。

:)
IS
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.u.../world-ranking

Now you are talking about B2L2's degree and this I can tell you.

He is the Bachelor of Science, University of Hong Kong. The World ranking of this University is 43 2014-2015. To get to this University at his time is extremely difficult since there is only 2 University at that time. To be able to get in the Science faculty, one must have very good result in Maths, Physics and Chemistry in the Advance Level Examination of Hong Kong.


I am pretty sure of you degree. Bachelor of Science in skiing, Fox Hole University, Tahoe. Specialized in Hiding in fox hole and bad mouth in internet world .

此篇文章於 2015-04-30 09:35 AM 被 pku 編輯。
pku 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2015-04-30, 11:20 AM   #412
B2L2
滑雪瘋3級
 
註冊日期: 2011-03-04
文章: 346
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

In Buddha world, does people hate each other? does people need to rank himself against others? Does people lie to each other? Does people pretended they are always right and others are always wrong?
B2L2 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2015-04-30, 11:31 AM   #413
B2L2
滑雪瘋3級
 
註冊日期: 2011-03-04
文章: 346
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

In the world i live in, Bachelor of Arts degree is given to Social Sciences graduates. We don't call it as a science degree. Maybe in your world, u call things differently or its your lack of knowledge.
B2L2 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2015-04-30, 07:51 PM   #414
taichiskiing
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2009-02-07
文章: 3,756
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

引用:
作者: pku 查看文章
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.u.../world-ranking

Now you are talking about B2L2's degree and this I can tell you.

He is the Bachelor of Science, University of Hong Kong. The World ranking of this University is 43 2014-2015. To get to this University at his time is extremely difficult since there is only 2 University at that time. To be able to get in the Science faculty, one must have very good result in Maths, Physics and Chemistry in the Advance Level Examination of Hong Kong.
“Bachelor of Science” has many disciplines, what was his major? Given the way he argued and the arguments he presented, I'm pretty sure he was not a “Maths, Physics and Chemistry” major. Even he had good grades then, he has lost them now. With the notion of such high standards, I guess that you don't have a college degree neither.

引用:
I am pretty sure of you degree. Bachelor of Science in skiing, Fox Hole University, Tahoe. Specialized in Hiding in fox hole and bad mouth in internet world .
Shouting louder won't make your words become true, only make you look like a clown.

:)
IS
taichiskiing 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2015-04-30, 07:56 PM   #415
taichiskiing
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2009-02-07
文章: 3,756
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

引用:
作者: B2L2 查看文章
In Buddha world, does people hate each other? does people need to rank himself against others? Does people lie to each other? Does people pretended they are always right and others are always wrong?
No. No. No. No. What you talk about is what Buddha calls it “chaotic” “紅塵,” and you whistler group's behaviors in this forum reflect all that.

引用:
作者: B2L2 查看文章
In the world i live in, Bachelor of Arts degree is given to Social Sciences graduates. We don't call it as a science degree. Maybe in your world, u call things differently or its your lack of knowledge.
Still wiggling, eh? so, what's your “major”? And I think both CSU and UC systems give Math, Physics, Chemistry major “Bachelor of Arts” degree not “Bachelor of Science” degree, what do you make of that? “or its your lack of knowledge”? I did say that you live in a small world.

:)
IS
taichiskiing 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2015-04-30, 09:48 PM   #416
pku
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2010-05-30
文章: 3,787
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

引用:
作者: taichiskiing 查看文章
“Bachelor of Science” has many disciplines, what was his major? Given the way he argued and the arguments he presented, I'm pretty sure he was not a “Maths, Physics and Chemistry” major. Even he had good grades then, he has lost them now. With the notion of such high standards, I guess that you don't have a college degree neither.



Shouting louder won't make your words become true, only make you look like a clown.

:)
IS
那你太湖狐狸洞大學畢業生亂抄理論出來䀡又怎可跟一個香港大學高材生比,那樣淺的 kinetic energy , 那用到要 Maths , physics major, 你那間太湖狐狸洞大學就算 主修但到畢業仍然是一頭霧水,

我就是喜歡用大字,怕你老眼昏花,看不淸楚

此篇文章於 2015-04-30 09:51 PM 被 pku 編輯。
pku 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2015-05-01, 02:47 AM   #417
B2L2
滑雪瘋3級
 
註冊日期: 2011-03-04
文章: 346
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

引用:
作者: taichiskiing 查看文章
No. No. No. No. What you talk about is what Buddha calls it “chaotic” “紅塵,” and you whistler group's behaviors in this forum reflect all that.
I see. And your behaviors here doesn't reflect all these too, you think?

引用:
作者: taichiskiing 查看文章
Still wiggling, eh? so, what's your “major”? And I think both CSU and UC systems give Math, Physics, Chemistry major “Bachelor of Arts” degree not “Bachelor of Science” degree, what do you make of that? “or its your lack of knowledge”? I did say that you live in a small world.
Yes, there are BA degree or BSc degree for many subjects (math, phy). It's up to the University. Some universities even provides both BA and BSc degree for these mentioned subjects depends on which courses the student took. Oh, btw, does any of this info related to SocScience that we were talking earlier?

Well, my major is irrelevant in this discussion here. My degree is a BSc degree. If you don't like a BSc degree holder as your tutor, that's your lost. You could move on and nobody stops you. :)
B2L2 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2015-05-01, 02:58 AM   #418
beg
滑雪瘋6級
 
註冊日期: 2010-07-10
文章: 2,094
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

引用:
作者: B2L2 查看文章
I see. And your behaviors here doesn't reflect all these too, you think?



Yes, there are BA degree or BSc degree for many subjects (math, phy). It's up to the University. Some universities even provides both BA and BSc degree for these mentioned subjects depends on which courses the student took. Oh, btw, does any of this info related to SocScience that we were talking earlier?

Well, my major is irrelevant in this discussion here. My degree is a BSc degree. If you don't like a BSc degree holder as your tutor, that's your lost. You could move on and nobody stops you. :)
Taichi always hate and jealous people has degree even just a ski instructor certificate because he is a loser.
beg 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2015-05-01, 03:41 AM   #419
taichiskiing
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2009-02-07
文章: 3,756
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

引用:
作者: pku 查看文章
那你太湖狐狸洞大學畢業生亂抄理論出來䀡又怎可跟一個香港大學高材生比,那樣淺的 kinetic energy , 那用到要 Maths , physics major, 你那間太湖狐狸洞大學就算 主修但到畢業仍然是一頭霧水,
小麻雀的得意!你們香港大學的招生考試比臺灣的“大專聯考”是「小巫見大巫」‧而根據他對我的反駁的反應,他不被因學科“二分ㄧ”不及格當掉是算他幸運,“高材生”?好笑話‧是你對高級教育學習的過程和高級物裡的發展“一頭霧水”,所有的理論物理、高級物理,都是從數學上發展出來的‧

http://video.pbs.org/video/2365464997/

引用:


我就是喜歡用大字,怕你老眼昏花,看不淸楚
只有耳聾的人講話用喊的,因為他聽不見所以認為他人也聽不見‧你一般生活的見識,問題多多,層出不窮。

:)
IS
taichiskiing 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
舊 2015-05-01, 04:06 AM   #420
taichiskiing
滑雪瘋7級
 
註冊日期: 2009-02-07
文章: 3,756
預設 回覆: Flatboarding vs. Skiing

引用:
作者: B2L2 查看文章
I see. And your behaviors here doesn't reflect all these too, you think?
No, I don't, what you see is the mirror imagines of you whistler group's behaviors, and that's called, “以其人之道,還治於其人”。

引用:
Yes, there are BA degree or BSc degree for many subjects (math, phy). It's up to the University. Some universities even provides both BA and BSc degree for these mentioned subjects depends on which courses the student took. Oh, btw, does any of this info related to SocScience that we were talking earlier?
So, your implication that I lack of knowledge is actually you yourself “lack of knowledge”?

引用:
Well, my major is irrelevant in this discussion here. My degree is a BSc degree. If you don't like a BSc degree holder as your tutor, that's your lost. You could move on and nobody stops you. :)
Yup, that is very “relevant,” I have called you a “lair,” and you can only “duck” shamelessly. Thanks for proving my words, "you are math/physics/sci challenged." No, I have not lost but you get kicked on the butt. If you want to continue to buck your head against my “posts,” by all means, my “post” will be always here. Have a good headache.

:)
IS
taichiskiing 目前離線   回覆時引用此篇文章
回覆

書籤

主題工具
顯示模式

發文規則
不可以發表新主題
不可以發表回覆
不可以上傳附件
不可以編輯自己的文章

啟用 BB 代碼
論壇啟用 表情符號
論壇啟用 [IMG] 代碼
論壇禁用 HTML 代碼


所有時間均為台北時間。現在的時間是 07:11 AM


Powered by vBulletin® 版本 3.7.4
版權所有 ©2000 - 2021,Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.