國王的新衣,只有聰明人才可看見taichiskiing 寫:沒說“高手的境界”“容易”,但是“高手”能「持之以恆」,最後總是能“熟能生巧”的‧你沒有眼界,雖然你有高手的技術,“看不見”,你也是進不了“高手的境界”的。
:)
IS
整天說你的技術之高,只有高手才懂。
除非高手把絕技隱藏,否則普通人也應該看得出他是高手。
版主: norman
國王的新衣,只有聰明人才可看見taichiskiing 寫:沒說“高手的境界”“容易”,但是“高手”能「持之以恆」,最後總是能“熟能生巧”的‧你沒有眼界,雖然你有高手的技術,“看不見”,你也是進不了“高手的境界”的。
:)
IS
還是國王沒穿新衣,而自以為聰明人“自欺欺人”?pku 寫:國王的新衣,只有聰明人才可看見
更像是你們弱慢族辯不過,看不懂高級技術,只會“否認”,“弱慢族的爭論”。整天說你的技術之高,只有高手才懂。
普通人是看得懂,都說好,只有半吊子的假高手,自以為會滑雪,看不懂,要不要亮一下你們CSIA的“高手絕技”,或是解釋一下你們CSIA的“高手絕技”是什麼?除非高手把絕技隱藏,否則普通人也應該看得出他是高手。
正如你講,國王沒穿新衣,你跟本不是高手,高手的最重要的條件,速度快,無論 alpine race, freestlye. Skier cross. Technical skiing. 速度也是最重要,或是其中最重要,taichiskiing 寫:還是國王沒穿新衣,而自以為聰明人“自欺欺人”?
更像是你們弱慢族辯不過,看不懂高級技術,只會“否認”,“弱慢族的爭論”。
普通人是看得懂,都說好,只有半吊子的假高手,自以為會滑雪,看不懂,要不要亮一下你們CSIA的“高手絕技”,或是解釋一下你們CSIA的“高手絕技”是什麼?
:)
IS
pku 寫:正如你講,國王沒穿新衣,你跟本不是高手,高手的最重要的條件,速度快,無論 alpine race, freestlye. Skier cross. Technical skiing. 速度也是最重要,或是其中最重要,
CSIA 算是 technical skiing. 技術要求, edge and pressure early in the turn , more or less balance on the center of the skis, turning with the lower body . Balance on outside skis early
Outcome is still pretty fast
That would depend on what you mean by "高手." I view skiing as a sport of adventure, and skis are a tool/vehicle to go from point A to point B, so by "高手" I mean one who is "competent, confident, and comfortable in all his or her skiing environments," which are mostly "off-piste." The "speed" you've mentioned is "too" artificial. How fast do you think is the "speed" of your "高手"? Beyond the speed, I'd also like to have some "maneuverability."pku 寫:正如你講,國王沒穿新衣,你跟本不是,高手的最重要的條件,速度快,無論 alpine race, freestlye. Skier cross. Technical skiing. 速度也是最重要,或是其中最重要,
You CSIA may be technical skiing; we Taichi Skiing rather be "functional." With Flatboarding(TM), Taichi Skiing "rides" the skis, that is, using "weight" to direct the skis and "rides" on the moving skis. "Riding" is more efficient than "skiing," thus faster than skiing.CSIA 算是 technical skiing. 技術要求, edge and pressure early in the turn , more or less balance on the center of the skis, turning with the lower body . Balance on outside skis early
Outcome is still pretty fast
自己話自己滑得快,好,有效,自己話自己是高手。taichiskiing 寫:That would depend on what you mean by "高手." I view skiing as a sport of adventure, and skis are a tool/vehicle to go from point A to point B, so by "高手" I mean one who is "competent, confident, and comfortable in all his or her skiing environments," which are mostly "off-piste." The "speed" you've mentioned is "too" artificial. How fast do you think is the "speed" of your "高手"? Beyond the speed, I'd also like to have some "maneuverability."
Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: spins - YouTube
You CSIA may be technical skiing; we Taichi Skiing rather be "functional." With Flatboarding(TM), Taichi Skiing "rides" the skis, that is, using "weight" to direct the skis and "rides" on the moving skis. "Riding" is more efficient than "skiing," thus faster than skiing.
Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: powder day, Olympicdownhill, Heavenly, TTB - YouTube
[pku;26370]Contemporary Skiing - YouTube
:)
IS
我的標準是根據物理的,滑能符合物理的標準的人,不只是我,都是高手‧ 弱慢的標準只是根據他自己的喜好,你也是一樣,不可取用。pku 寫:自己話自己滑得快,好,有效,自己話自己是高手。
弱慢也是用自己為標準,為何除你自己外,其他人不能用自己為標準
你不要講我,我不是高手,taichiskiing 寫:我的標準是根據物理的,滑能符合物理的標準的人,不只是我,都是高手‧ 弱慢的標準只是根據他自己的喜好,你也是一樣,不可取用。
:)
IS
既然知道自己不是高手還講什麼?“小人以犯上為榮”?pku 寫:你不要講我,我不是高手,
太極滑雪是有很“明顯突出的技術”,高手應該是有明顯突出的技術,讓人有欣賞之處,這是一般人的標準
你是自認高手,真正的高手是人家尊稱,不是自己叫自己,如 Blake 我就認為是饅頭高手taichiskiing 寫:既然知道自己不是高手還講什麼?“小人以犯上為榮”?
太極滑雪是有很“明顯突出的技術”,
Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: spins - YouTube
但是你“看不懂”,對,你不是高手,也沒有高手的見識。
"You critics lack of integrity, and your words have no creditability."
:)
IS
“我的標準是根據物理的,滑能符合物理的標準的人,不只是我,都是高手‧” 我滑的要是能“符合物理的標準”,我當然也不除外‧你用的“高手”已流於世俗的“虛偽”了‧會滑饅頭是一門技術,但是,認為只有會滑饅頭才算會滑雪卻是小知小技的“管眼”/tunnel vision‧ There are more skiing than just mogul skiing.pku 寫:你是自認高手,真正的高手是人家尊稱,不是自己叫自己,如 Blake 我就認為是饅頭高手
真人是不需要別人讚美的,你一般看不懂的人就是讚美也是“假”的,你太重視你自己的意見了,but when Bob Barnes praised my skiing you couldn't help but slipped into perpetuated denials? Funny that.你在網上吹牛十年有多,除弱慢何時有人讚美過你滑得好![]()
人家只講個一句你是 good skier ,Bob Barnes 也算高手,你最多只能算高手口中的good skier.taichiskiing 寫:“我的標準是根據物理的,滑能符合物理的標準的人,不只是我,都是高手‧” 我滑的要是能“符合物理的標準”,我當然也不除外‧你用的“高手”已流於世俗的“虛偽”了‧會滑饅頭是一門技術,但是,認為只有會滑饅頭才算會滑雪卻是小知小技的“管眼”/tunnel vision‧ There are more skiing than just mogul skiing.
真人是不需要別人讚美的,你一般看不懂的人就是讚美也是“假”的,你太重視你自己的意見了,but when Bob Barnes praised my skiing you couldn't help but slipped into perpetuated denials? Funny that.
:)
IS
No, Bob Barnes is one of leading authority in the "skiing industry," and his words have creditability, so yes, when he said my skiing is good, that is good enough for me, which makes my skiing in higher skills above you average skiers, and you “小知小技” "slipped into perpetuated denial," or is you “小知小人以犯上為榮”?pku 寫:人家只講個一句你是 good skier ,Bob Barnes 也算高手,你最多只能算高手口中的good skier.
You need all the CSIA高手 to do those skills, and I can do those all by myself and some,CSIA高手,饅頭,樹林, carving , run gates , short turn ,long turn 樣樣皆能,我講他們的名字你又不認識, Blake 你認識我才提他的名字
taichiskiing 寫:No, Bob Barnes is one of leading authority in the "skiing industry," and his words have creditability, so yes, when he said my skiing is good, that is good enough for me, which makes my skiing in higher skills above you average skiers, and you “小知小技” "slipped into perpetuated denial," or is you “小知小人以犯上為榮”?
You need all the CSIA高手 to do those skills, and I can do those all by myself and some,
Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: superpipe - YouTube
the real question is "can you do all of them"? What, you can't? which makes you a “小知小技”. Who else an unknown person have praised your skiing skills?
"You critics lack of integrity, and your words have no creditability."
:)
IS
Or maybe logic.B2L2 寫:Is your English really that bad? Go read again:
所有instructor看完滑雪者滑完都會先說一句"good skiing",(不管有沒有跟他學)taichiskiing 寫:when he said my skiing is good, that is good enough for me
That's all I want to do, a full-motioned superpipe, completed. The question, as always, can you do it? "What? no,..."?pku 寫:Good skiers is better than average skiers, 跟 high end 拉不上関係,
用下䐉袋,這麼間單跳half pipe 的動作,也拿出來。
Maybe just your English bad?B2L2 寫:Is your English really that bad? Go read again:
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.epicski.com/forum/thread/...g#post_1235744
And so, I like the skiing of Snowbender in his video clip. While it is not the style that I would usually prefer for myself, and it alone does not make him an expert, I contend that few skiers on any mountain could imitate him. Any true expert could easily imitate his movements and "style" if he wanted to. While it is true that few experts ski like him (very often), it is also true that anyone who cannot ski like Snowbender is certainly not an expert.
Anyone would benefit from turning Snowbender's "style" into a drill and seeking to master it, even if you don't like skiing that way. In ways that perhaps few might understand, Snowbender's "exercise" is helping him master many important nuances of expert skiing, including subtle edge control, mastery of rotational (angular) momentum, and fore-aft balance. As an exercise, he is developing a "touch" that few skiers have, but all would benefit from.
Everyone that cannot ski like a beginner can claim himself a expert. That's logical. Skiing like taichiski should be easy by Bob Barnes since he is an expert.taichiskiing 寫:Maybe just your English bad?
"I contend that few skiers on any mountain could imitate him."
"it is also true that anyone who cannot ski like Snowbender is certainly not an expert."
"Anyone would benefit from turning Snowbender's "style" into a drill and seeking to master it, even if you don't like skiing that way."
"Snowbender's "exercise" is helping him master many important nuances of expert skiing, including subtle edge control, mastery of rotational (angular) momentum, and fore-aft balance. As an exercise, he is developing a "touch" that few skiers have, but all would benefit from."
Yes, I called those comments "praise," how do you read?
Only one problem thou, what he called "exercise" is actually my "everyday skiing."
Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: free skiing, Kirkwood - YouTube
:)
IS