正確的傾及錯誤的傾之比對

[pku]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJjmFTKxj_I


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Np-Ov-THcWk


Slow!

Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: High Five, Heavenly - YouTube


:)
IS

轉彎比轉彎我做小彎，中彎，你那段大彎出來比，你的彎 skid 那麼多，那才是慢

[taichiskiing]

My bumps skiing is smooth and fast comapre with yours

Not really, my line is straighter on this clip, and if you cannot read my shadow, here's another one you may see how my body moves “smooth and fast”‧

Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: mogul - YouTube

A so call PSIA clinician says " moguls sucks" . How he can teach his students ski moguls.

I think that he has “being there, done that, and youre behind his time.”As I have seen he skied the most “graceful” mogul skiing ever, teaching mogul skiing is not that hard if you know the “principles of skiing.”

This CSIA L4 skis moguls , powder just like skiing groom run but skiing with him needs a lot money. For sure you won't have that much money. Poor shameless old man

We have moved beyond the “turn skiing,” your CSIA L4 may want to learn how to do “line-skiing,” too, you shameless CSIA L2.

All-mountain Skiing: free skiing - YouTube

Trail again

Can you make a “smooth and fast” trail run?

Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: free skiing - YouTube

轉彎比轉彎我做小彎，中彎，你那段大彎出來比，你的彎 skid 那麼多，那才是慢

我的中、小彎不是在這影片之前就已經放過了？你要在看一次也無妨‧

Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: long turns, short turns, and turn on demand - YouTube












你只會看“skid”，那是你的“瞽盲不視”； I don't skid‧

Lines of Flatboarding/Flatskiing 1 - YouTube



:)
IS

[B2L2]

Another example of your shameless deny and baseless arguments. Making a comment on all CSIA L4? What make you think you're qualify to make that statement?

You know how many CSIA L4 up to this year? How many you could name them? Do you know each of them and how each ski?

You are trying to slap your own face to pretend as a fat. You tried to tell us you could follow this person (that you call as your friend), but not a CSIA L4. You're trying to imply that you're better than a CSIA L4. However, this statement is baseless and plainly wrong. Your shameless deny made you a shameless person.

[beg]

A very stupid stance. both feet stick together looks like mono ski but with big gap of daylight between feet.

Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: long turns, short turns, and turn on demand - YouTube

[norman]

Can you make a “smooth and fast” trail run?

Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: free skiing - YouTube




我的中、小彎不是在這影片之前就已經放過了？你要在看一次也無妨‧

Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: long turns, short turns, and turn on demand - YouTube

你必須正視一個問題，你的這些影片皆是在整理好的，相當平坦的滑道做的動作，不要說是PKU，對我而言都太簡單了，要這樣併腿轉彎還不容易。問題是叫我們拍這種沒營養對自己沒幫助的影片是沒意義的，又不是時間多拍片多？幹嘛浪費自己少少的滑雪時間也浪費他人幫拍的時間呢？

你看到PKU偶爾雪板還會打開，幾乎都是在較困難的地形上，而在這些較困難的地形你一樣會打開，簡單滑道你我他其實是沒差別的，最多只是動作運用的級別，但在困難的地形，你就比PKU慢太多了，這並非體力年紀的問題，而是技術級別高低的差別。

你只會看“skid”，那是你的“瞽盲不視”； I don't skid‧

Lines of Flatboarding/Flatskiing 1 - YouTube


:)
IS

坦白講，你的刻線是「不乾淨」的。在這整理好的簡單滑道，刻線還如此不乾淨，就已經證明你的刻滑動作是有問題的。








刻線至少要像下面這樣才叫乾淨。

[pku]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0YZBXGy9Cc


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZbpfLtSnhQ


Not really, my line is straighter on this clip, and if you cannot read my shadow, here's another one you may see how my body moves “smooth and fast”‧




:)
IS

My line is straight, the moguls are big and I still can keep the rhythm going. Your bumps are small, trough are wide but you still need to slide and almost come to a stop to avoid the slightly bigger bumps. Your upper body is swinging like riding a crazy horse

[pku]

Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: mogul - YouTube

I think that he has “being there, done that, and youre behind his time.”As I have seen he skied the most “graceful” mogul skiing ever, teaching mogul skiing is not that hard if you know the “principles of skiing.”

We have moved beyond the “turn skiing,” your CSIA L4 may want to learn how to do “line-skiing,” too, you shameless CSIA L2.

All-mountain Skiing: free skiing - YouTube


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGQMyD0HnGc


:)
IS

Ski slow line slow, who's going to learn this stupid line skiing

Poor shameless old man

[taichiskiing]

Another example of your shameless deny and baseless arguments. Making a comment on all CSIA L4? What make you think you're qualify to make that statement?

“技術本位”‧If you cannot do the techniques you describe, doesn't what title you have, you are a fake, that is declared very early in this forum. I have no problem with CSIA L4, but I do have problems with you Whistler group steal your CSIA L4's skills here to pretend that's yours, you gappers are nowhere near their levels.

You know how many CSIA L4 up to this year? How many you could name them? Do you know each of them and how each ski?

None; nevertheless, through my 40 years thousands days active skiing's experience and my 40+ years of physics and martial training, I can tell how each of them moves and skis when I see them, just like any other martial arts opponent I've encountered. A “turn skiing” is a “turn skiing.”

You are trying to slap your own face to pretend as a fat. You tried to tell us you could follow this person (that you call as your friend), but not a CSIA L4. You're trying to imply that you're better than a CSIA L4. However, this statement is baseless and plainly wrong. Your shameless deny made you a shameless person.

No, I don't pretend I know them L4, nor better than them, they are “expert skiers”/高手, I respect their ways to ski, even though I don't have to ski like them. I have no contention with them L4; it is you Whistler group who steal their title to pretend that's your skills I despised. Shameless is you Whistler group.

:)
IS

[taichiskiing]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlZ0f59mW7w

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ifs-6pjhDM


My line is straight, the moguls are big and I still can keep the rhythm going. Your bumps are small, trough are wide but you still need to slide and almost come to a stop to avoid the slightly bigger bumps. Your upper body is swinging like riding a crazy horse



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZbpfLtSnhQ

小知小技自拍胸脯。

:)
IS

[taichiskiing]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEpPBnud7jc

Ski slow line slow, who's going to learn this stupid line skiing

Poor shameless old man

You shameless CSIA L2, “下流人的嗚咽，下流人的回言，下流人”。”

:)
IS

[B2L2]

“技術本位”‧If you cannot do the techniques you describe, doesn't what title you have, you are a fake, that is declared very early in this forum. I have no problem with CSIA L4, but I do have problems with you Whistler group steal your CSIA L4's skills here to pretend that's yours, you gappers are nowhere near their levels.

None; nevertheless, through my 40 years thousands days active skiing's experience and my 40+ years of physics and martial training, I can tell how each of them moves and skis when I see them, just like any other martial arts opponent I've encountered. A “turn skiing” is a “turn skiing.”

No, I don't pretend I know them L4, nor better than them, they are “expert skiers”/高手, I respect their ways to ski, even though I don't have to ski like them. I have no contention with them L4; it is you Whistler group who steal their title to pretend that's your skills I despised. Shameless is you Whistler group.

Why all a sudden acting so humble in this post? :)

Tell me when/how/where anyone here pretend we have the CSIA L4 skill? Is that your imagination? I do consider that you aren't as good as any CSIA L4 though.

Having 40 years of experience of doing one thing doesn't automatically give your the master status. Go read the post "Why you shouldn't trust yourself so much" again.

At one point, you said TaiChiSkiing is superb and above all xSIA system. However, no where you could prove that. That was one of the beginning of your baseless deny.

Now your chance to prove your statement mathematically and scientifically to us.

[pku]

小知小技自拍胸脯。

:)
IS

論小知小技，那及天下聞名的無恥偽太極。 Slow line ski slow

[taichiskiing]

Why all a sudden acting so humble in this post? :)

No, maybe just you start to learn something yourself.

Tell me when/how/where anyone here pretend we have the CSIA L4 skill? Is that your imagination? I do consider that you aren't as good as any CSIA L4 though.

When you Whistler group post CSIA L4's videos and claiming how good their skills are without footnotes or you own opinions, you are plagiarizing. When you're plagiarizing, your opinion doesn't count.

Having 40 years of experience of doing one thing doesn't automatically give your the master status. Go read the post "Why you shouldn't trust yourself so much" again.

「為學日益，為道日損，損之又損以至於無，為無為而無不為矣。」—道德經 48—

No time to waste for reading a “half baked” “自以為是”。

At one point, you said TaiChiSkiing is superb and above all xSIA system. However, no where you could prove that. That was one of the beginning of your baseless deny.

Now your chance to prove your statement mathematically and scientifically to us.

The proof was already there, but you don't have knowledge to see it. As “Unism”/一元世界, (the final “total” body,) there's nothing beyond Taichi, for all you xSIA's “improvements,” the best you can do, in the end would skiing just like him (a PSIA guy)/us.

Flatboarding/Line-skiing: free skiing - YouTube



:)
IS

[B2L2]

When you Whistler group post CSIA L4's videos and claiming how good their skills are without footnotes or you own opinions, you are plagiarizing. When you're plagiarizing, your opinion doesn't count.

Oh, plagiarizing. Which message and which thread? Example? You should you read that right?

「為學日益，為道日損，損之又損以至於無，為無為而無不為矣。」—道德經 48—

No time to waste for reading a “half baked” “自以為是”。

Using no time as excuse? Is that why you can't answer trivial question correctly?

The proof was already there, but you don't have knowledge to see it. As “Unism”/一元世界, (the final “total” body,) there's nothing beyond Taichi, for all you xSIA's “improvements,” the best you can do, in the end would skiing just like him (a PSIA guy)/us.

Where is the mathematically and scientifically prove that you claim? Using a ex-PSIA guy is a prove for TaiChiSkiing is superior than PSIA? What a joke? Maybe ask your ex-PSIA friend to come make that statement.

No prove = no prove, which made you a fake "big-if-IS".

And how to prove there is nothing beyond TaiChi mathematically and scientifically? Come on, I'm waiting for your answer. You said everything you said is mathematically and scientifically correct. NO, big-if-IS?

[taichiskiing]

Oh, plagiarizing. Which message and which thread? Example? You should you read that right?

Ask questions to play dumb like norman? You are getting lower with each response. Yes, you are plagiarizing, even on this thread, “(You ski like a CSIA L4 is required when you compare me with a CSIA L4, otherwise, you have no standing to even making a comparision.)” and you cannot ski like CSIA L4. So yes, “you are plagiarizing”。

Using no time as excuse? Is that why you can't answer trivial question correctly?

In your desperation, you cannot even “read” my article right. I'm not using “no time” as excuse, but “no time to waste,” period. “Trivial questions need not be answered,”“trivial,” that's why a waste of time [and energy].

Where is the mathematically and scientifically prove that you claim? Using a ex-PSIA guy is a prove for TaiChiSkiing is superior than PSIA? What a joke? Maybe ask your ex-PSIA friend to come make that statement.

Did predict that you lack of “mathematically and scientifically” background and you cannot comprehend what I said about the physics. Yes, using ex-PSIA is a good way and right way as he has the PSIA credential to prove that Taichi Skiing is the “final” form of skiing. “Superior than” is an intermediate skier's terminology. Joke is on you.

No prove = no prove, which made you a fake "big-if-IS".

And how to prove there is nothing beyond TaiChi mathematically and scientifically? Come on, I'm waiting for your answer. You said everything you said is mathematically and scientifically correct. NO, big-if-IS?

The true realm of Taichi is Unism/一元世界/one element world. And what is Unism/一元世界/one element world? “Beyond words”/no word (when you say a word, there is no longer a “one element world,” as the “word” and “non-word” come together,) so the “True” realm of Taichi cannot be discussed nor talked about it. Taichi can only be reached through a “no-mind”(direct) enlightenment, and enlightenment can only be reached through “sense of feeling,” thus cannot be analysis by scientifically means. (And Taichichuan is not Taichi.) Given that you gappers’ insidious minds are all over the places, no, you cannot see into Taichi. Nevertheless, 道得經 did provide a Way for practicing.

「為學日益，為道日損，損之又損以至於無，為無為而無不為矣。」—道德經 48—

(Reduce your worldly matter and thinking until you can see into the world without using language.)

And that's where Taichi Skiing ends up, “no extra movements.”

Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: long turns, short turns, and turn on demand - YouTube



:)
IS

[B2L2]

It was you who said that everything you said here can be proved.

Now the ex-PSIA folk is not a math/sci prove. The not word to describe is not a math/sci prove.

How could people trust what you said anymore? Tell us please?

For CSIA, you really don't understand it. The CSIA standard for each level is widely available. People need to show those skill set in order to achieve the standard. So it is clean for those familiar with CSIA to see what a L1/L2/L3/L4 is capable to do at the minimum. Now with this standard in place, people (us) could easier use that as a common standard.

Just like any sport, if the rule is set and widely available. Then it is fairly easy for anyone to "judge" (may not be the final judgement but shouldn't be far off) whether the player is good or bad against the set rule. It doesn't require people to play basketball in the NBA level to make judgement any NBA player. It also doesn't require people to ski like CSIA L4 to compare a CSIA L4 against you. You logic failed badly.

However, when a system doesn't have any standard (like your so call TaiChi skiing), the same can't apply.

[pku]

Ask questions to play dumb like norman? You are getting lower with each response. Yes, you are plagiarizing, even on this thread, “(You ski like a CSIA L4 is required when you compare me with a CSIA L4, otherwise, you have no standing to even making a comparision.)” and you cannot ski like CSIA L4. So yes, “you are plagiarizing”。

:)
IS

A CSIA 4 is considered an expert and high end skier. You claim your skiing is high end and an expert skier but what you did is far from a CSIA 4. That's why we bring out the CSIA 4 video to show you we is our standard for expert skier and high end skiing. You skiing is just a joke, just like a old mean driving for 50 years and said he got good driving technique.

In your desperation, you cannot even “read” my article right. I'm not using “no time” as excuse, but “no time to waste,” period. “Trivial questions need not be answered,”“trivial,” that's why a waste of time [and energy].

:)
IS

You said you have no time waste but actually you have waste more than 30 years of skiing, arguing in the forum without improving your skiing although you ski everyday.

Did predict that you lack of “mathematically and scientifically” background and you cannot comprehend what I said about the physics. Yes, using ex-PSIA is a good way and right way as he has the PSIA credential to prove that Taichi Skiing is the “final” form of skiing. “Superior than” is an intermediate skier's terminology. Joke is on you.

:)
IS

Any document you can support. What kind of qialification you got in math and science. An stupid old man claiming others lack of “mathematically and scientifically” background is alreday a big joke.

The true realm of Taichi is Unism/一元世界/one element world. And what is Unism/一元世界/one element world? “Beyond words”/no word (when you say a word, there is no longer a “one element world,” as the “word” and “non-word” come together,) so the “True” realm of Taichi cannot be discussed nor talked about it. Taichi can only be reached through a “no-mind”(direct) enlightenment, and enlightenment can only be reached through “sense of feeling,” thus cannot be analysis by scientifically means. (And Taichichuan is not Taichi.) Given that you gappers’ insidious minds are all over the places, no, you cannot see into Taichi. Nevertheless, 道得經 did provide a Way for practicing.

「為學日益，為道日損，損之又損以至於無，為無為而無不為矣。」—道德經 48—

(Reduce your worldly matter and thinking until you can see into the world without using language.)

And that's where Taichi Skiing ends up, “no extra movements.”

Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: long turns, short turns, and turn on demand - YouTube


:)
IS

You old stupid man is always swinging the hands like riiding a crazy horse. This stipid movement makes you like an idoit. It's not only extera, it's stupid.

[taichiskiing]

It was you who said that everything you said here can be proved.

Yes??? Scientific “proof” is determined by “logic,” and “holistic proof” is by “enlightenment.”

Now the ex-PSIA folk is not a math/sci prove. The not word to describe is not a math/sci prove.

Or you don't know what a “proof” is? The physical proof is the ultimate proof.

How could people trust what you said anymore? Tell us please?

Be humble, and get rid of your false beliefs, you may see the light.

「為學日益，為道日損，損之又損以至於無，為無為而無不為矣。」

For CSIA, you really don't understand it. The CSIA standard for each level is widely available. People need to show those skill set in order to achieve the standard. So it is clean for those familiar with CSIA to see what a L1/L2/L3/L4 is capable to do at the minimum. Now with this standard in place, people (us) could easier use that as a common standard.

No, here we are NOT talking about your CSIA “standards,”but “physics” of all the skiing, not the “minmum” but the “final” forms.

Just like any sport, if the rule is set and widely available. Then it is fairly easy for anyone to "judge" (may not be the final judgement but shouldn't be far off) whether the player is good or bad against the set rule. It doesn't require people to play basketball in the NBA level to make judgement any NBA player. It also doesn't require people to ski like CSIA L4 to compare a CSIA L4 against you. You logic failed badly.

Nevertheless, if you want to discuss the “techniques,” you do need to know the “contents” what you're talking about, not the rules of the game, but techniques themselves.

However, when a system doesn't have any standard (like your so call TaiChi skiing), the same can't apply.

Taichi Skiing's standard—“physics”—is the highest standard of them all.

:)
IS

[taichiskiing]

A CSIA 4 is considered an expert and high end skier. You claim your skiing is high end and an expert skier but what you did is far from a CSIA 4. That's why we bring out the CSIA 4 video to show you we is our standard for expert skier and high end skiing. You skiing is just a joke, just like a old mean driving for 50 years and said he got good driving technique.

Of course, a CSIA L4 may be considered an expert and high end skier, but you're not, so you cannot speak for them. They may be good, but their skiing doesn't invalidate Lito's skiing, so they don't invalidate mine. You comment is a joke. Take a look how this old man uses his 50 year old truck; without good driving and car knowledge, your truck would not have last that long.

Mountain Men: Rich Preps For Winter - YouTube

You said you have no time waste but actually you have waste more than 30 years of skiing, arguing in the forum without improving your skiing although you ski everyday.

That is to say, I have “studied” (作學問) on skiing for more than 30 years. You gappers' talking about“improving” is a joke.

Any document you can support. What kind of qialification you got in math and science. An stupid old man claiming others lack of “mathematically and scientifically” background is alreday a big joke.

“技術本位”does need qialification documents, “技術本位”itself is already the qualification. By now I'm pretty sure that none of you Whistler group has indepth “mathematically and scientifically” knowledge or training. Your denial is the joke.

You old stupid man is always swinging the hands like riiding a crazy horse. This stipid movement makes you like an idoit. It's not only extera, it's stupid.

No, it is you green MA cannot see that there are no muscles to move those hands. Stupidity is on you.

:)
IS

[norman]

“技術本位”does need qialification documents, “技術本位”itself is already the qualification. By now I'm pretty sure that none of you Whistler group has indepth “mathematically and scientifically” knowledge or training. Your denial is the joke.

:)
IS

要那做什麼？

制度只是一個團體為了制定標準而做出來的制度，但很多世界級本來不是在制度內，正因為他們證明了自己所以才被編入制度內的標準，如此一代代完善。

然而什麼是「技術本位」，如果你無法以一做多，那你的技術就不在「技術本位」內。如你的動作無法在困難的地形始終如一，那就不是「技術本位」。

講太早啦。