taichiskiing 寫:I see the root cause of this is that you are a “boring person, boring mind,” you cannot appreciate the elegance of the “quiter the body, higher the performance.”“Stop your tunnel vision.”
Told you that you would never see the root cause. Already said there is a deeper meaning and you just shamelessly deny. The shame should be on you instead.
taichiskiing 寫:I have been “more difficult and more interesting” places than you could imagine; that's to say, “been there, done that, and you are behind my time.”Taichi Skiing is a “moving meditation,”and I am now more interesting in balancing the “centripetal force” and “centrifugal force”and enjoy the grace of gravity, “the art of skiing,” and speed only a by-product.
Using your logic, without the ability to generate the by-product of "speed", your skill in harder runs has been proven to be lacking. You go enjoy your slow and skil-less tree runs but you're far from being an expert like your call yourself. Keep slapping your own face but you still far from a fat.
taichiskiing 寫:Snowplowing is a low class/poor, if not accident prone, technique for skiing powder and trees, and they are there only because the terrain is easy.
Good said to explain your speed on easy, flat runs. It is because the runs are "easy".
taichiskiing 寫:Sorry, I don't do gappers' challenge, boring. Meanwhile, enjoy the wild wild west of internet skiing, movements? Who needs to move?
Challenge?? No, it just prove that you aren't capable to do what I said. You have no video to prove in all your previous years of skiing. Now you're getting older and skiing is getting worse, you just wouldn't able to do it, period.
Yes, go enjoy your "internet skiing". That's the prefect term to describe your skiing.
And we all know your shameless deny will be the coming answer to this. You're so predictable. Later.
B2L2 寫:Told you that you would never see the root cause. Already said there is a deeper meaning and you just shamelessly deny. The shame should be on you instead.
You're only half right, but you don't see my deeper meaning is deeper than yours; that is to say, my deeper meaning “covers” what you think as deeper meaning, so the “shameless denials” are you Whistler group, so “The shame should be on you [Whistler group] instead.”
Using your logic, without the ability to generate the by-product of "speed", your skill in harder runs has been proven to be lacking. You go enjoy your slow and skil-less tree runs but you're far from being an expert like your call yourself. Keep slapping your own face but you still far from a fat.
Accordingly, I don't think that you even know what “by-product” means, and “slow and skil-less tree runs” are you Whistler group “Keep slapping your own face but you still far from a fat”“perpetuated denial.” You gappers cannot even do the tree runs, let alone to keep up with us.
Good said to explain your speed on easy, flat runs. It is because the runs are "easy".
Of course, a master does thing always looks “easy.”
Challenge?? No, it just prove that you aren't capable to do what I said. You have no video to prove in all your previous years of skiing. Now you're getting older and skiing is getting worse, you just wouldn't able to do it, period.
The challenge to you is to prove that you are “capable to do what you said yourself.”I don't do your system, I don't have to know/do what you said, and my system is already over your head.
taichiskiing 寫:You're only half right, but you don't see my deeper meaning is deeper than yours; that is to say, my deeper meaning “covers” what you think as deeper meaning, so the “shameless denials” are you Whistler group, so “The shame should be on you [Whistler group] instead.”
So what actually is your deeper meaning when I said the root cause is some boring people posting boring video? LOL.
taichiskiing 寫:Accordingly, I don't think that you even know what “by-product” means, and “slow and skil-less tree runs” are you Whistler group “Keep slapping your own face but you still far from a fat”“perpetuated denial.” You gappers cannot even do the tree runs, let alone to keep up with us.
You're the person saying speed is a by-product of good skill. I agree with your logic. So when you incapable to generate speed in harder runs, it simply means you don't have the proper skill. That's your logic slapping your face. Which part I don't understand?? LOL
taichiskiing 寫:Of course, a master does thing always looks “easy.”
Maybe a bit more specific to call yourself a master for easy runs.
taichiskiing 寫:The challenge to you is to prove that you are “capable to do what you said yourself.”I don't do your system, I don't have to know/do what you said, and my system is already over your head.
I'm capable to do what I said? What do you mean? You mean going down the runs in the Whistler video that you aren't capable to do? What does that mean to you after? No matter what, you will be denying anyway.
taichiskiing 寫:Of course; you're almost right, except that you don't have an answer; the “perfect term” is called “perfect turn.”
I call that is your “shameless deny” in advance. Your “hit and run” tactic doesn't work on me. “You're so predictable,” you'll be back.
What's "hit and run"? I am just calling out your logic is wrong but you deny.
B2L2 寫:So what actually is your deeper meaning when I said the root cause is some boring people posting boring video? LOL.
My deeper meaning is that you are “boring person, boring mind,” with a “boring mind” you could only see/do “boring” things. Since there's nothing exciting about in your encounter things, which makes you a “boring person.” Yes, LOL.
You're the person saying speed is a by-product of good skill. I agree with your logic. So when you incapable to generate speed in harder runs, it simply means you don't have the proper skill. That's your logic slapping your face. Which part I don't understand?? LOL
If “speed” is a “by-product,” then you “don't” do anything to “generate speed,”and that's “where you don't understand.”Under the gravity and air resistance, in skiing, anything you do “extra” generates more frictions and air resistance, which rob your energy, which makes you slower down, so you've achieved to an opposite effect, and “That's your logic slapping your face.” LOL
Maybe a bit more specific to call yourself a master for easy runs.
You need to get your “tunnel vision” fixed.
I'm capable to do what I said? What do you mean? You mean going down the runs in the Whistler video that you aren't capable to do? What does that mean to you after? No matter what, you will be denying anyway.
Yes, I was saying that you are not capable to do what CSIA L4 demos, so you are plagiarizing. Yup, “No matter what, you will be denying anyway.”
What's "hit and run"? I am just calling out your logic is wrong but you deny.
I maybe back or I may be not. LOL
Yup, that's your “hit and run.” Don't let the door hit you when you sneak out of the door.
taichiskiing 寫:My deeper meaning is that you are “boring person, boring mind,” with a “boring mind” you could only see/do “boring” things. Since there's nothing exciting about in your encounter things, which makes you a “boring person.” Yes, LOL.
Are you running out of words these days or just like to copy-n-paste? :)
So your so-call "deeper" meaning is equal to your "original" meaning. LOL. Your comment of your "deeper" meaning is "deeper" than mine is just funny. Regardless, whether a movie is boring or not is not what the director said.
taichiskiing 寫:If “speed” is a “by-product,” then you “don't” do anything to “generate speed,”and that's “where you don't understand.”Under the gravity and air resistance, in skiing, anything you do “extra” generates more frictions and air resistance, which rob your energy, which makes you slower down, so you've achieved to an opposite effect, and “That's your logic slapping your face.” LOL
So if skiing down a tough run "slowly" is what you want and proud of, then said it.
taichiskiing 寫:You need to get your “tunnel vision” fixed.
You have to show me scientifically what my tunnel vision didn't see. Maybe you will then realize that you're the one with tunnel vision.
taichiskiing 寫:Yes, I was saying that you are not capable to do what CSIA L4 demos, so you are plagiarizing. Yup, “No matter what, you will be denying anyway.”
Like other said, you're getting old and loss your memory. Did I post any CSIA L4 demo video? Did I claim I am a CSIA L4? Why all a sudden I have to show CSIA L4 demo?
I posted one and only one video recently. The "some bump, some trees" video taken from Whistler. I basically made one comment saying that you are incapable to come down that run any faster. You couldn't provide any prove that you could do so and therefore I claim my statement is correct. For me, I consider any CSIA L4 could make the same run in fast and control manner. As a conclusion, I consider any CSIA L4 is better than your skiing in this particular run. (so which part in this statement requires me to ski like a CSIA L4?)
You posted video doing mogul competition and you never show any video going down a mogul run straight on the fall line. You are plagiarizing like you said.
taichiskiing 寫:Yup, that's your “hit and run.” Don't let the door hit you when you sneak out of the door.
Let me repeat. Using fact to discussion one thing usually make it clear. The only thing that make a discussion become muddy (like every single thread here) is only because you're denying what's being wrong.
pku 寫:你看看 Snowrider, Norman 對我的評價，便知我滑雪實力有多少，而你在各滑雪論壇都臭名遠播，便好應該反省一下。誰是那個無恥下流人。
我不是也說過你是“饅頭高手”？是你自己不敢接，現在又要吹自己有多少實力？小知小技‧事實上要不是你在那拼命的要表現你滑饅頭的技術高我還不會發現你只會滑那一種地形，你的“實力”突然在我的面前消失了，也証實了我的想法—“你不會滑別的地形”‧“臭名遠播”？ Yah, given that only me one vs. WWW, I call that a huge badge of honor.
引用:
作者: taichiskiing 查看文章
Of course, a master does thing always looks “easy.”
Why a trial is called a easy run because everyone can ski it with ease. 只有無恥下流人才會經常拿他自己滑trail 的片來當自己是 master
B2L2 寫:Are you running out of words these days or just like to copy-n-paste? :)
What, you mean “boring person boring mind”? no, that was not a copy-n-paste, but you actual state of mind. And your “boring” posting continues.
So your so-call "deeper" meaning is equal to your "original" meaning. LOL. Your comment of your "deeper" meaning is "deeper" than mine is just funny. Regardless, whether a movie is boring or not is not what the director said.
Another thing, you don't know why and how a system is bigger than or contains another system. Have you heard about the story about the “best painting”in an art show got hanged upside down? No, not because you say a movie is boring then the movie is boring!
So if skiing down a tough run "slowly" is what you want and proud of, then said it.
Yes and no, nowadays my “battle cry” to my proxy (those who ski with me) is “Slow Down.” The best way to ski spring snow trail is to slow down and stay on the “burns,” And you may not ski as “smooth” as her.
(I know you gappers don't really watch my videos, but I'll leave it here, just for the record and to keep the writing complete.)
You have to show me scientifically what my tunnel vision didn't see. Maybe you will then realize that you're the one with tunnel vision.
Not sure if you have the back ground knowledge to comprehend what I say, but ok, I'll try. Given a curved ski track, the relationship between the “angular acceleration” (a) (you do know what that is, don't you?), velocity (V), and the radius of the curved path (R) is given as R= V*V/a, and that is to say, mathematically, the longer the turn radius the faster the speed. The faster speed gives higher Kinetic Energy, which is given as KE=1/2* m*V*V, and the higher the KE gives higher performance. So, by observing the tracks that the skier left behind, we can estimate the energy the skier carried. When all else are equal, the straighter ski tracks carry higher energy than curvier one.
Barrowed from norman's photos,
Flatboard carving shows straighter line above than the pure-carving track below, “line-skiing” carries higher energy than “turn skiing.” And you don't know these relationship and cannot see that, your “tunnel vision” is proven.
Like other said, you're getting old and loss your memory. Did I post any CSIA L4 demo video? Did I claim I am a CSIA L4? Why all a sudden I have to show CSIA L4 demo?
I think that those CSIA L4's demos are posted by your Whistler group, and you came out batting for them, you are “guity by asscociation.”
I posted one and only one video recently. The "some bump, some trees" video taken from Whistler. I basically made one comment saying that you are incapable to come down that run any faster. You couldn't provide any prove that you could do so and therefore I claim my statement is correct. For me, I consider any CSIA L4 could make the same run in fast and control manner. As a conclusion, I consider any CSIA L4 is better than your skiing in this particular run. (so which part in this statement requires me to ski like a CSIA L4?)
Actually, I did provide proof, you just denied it, and no, I don't think you know how to read the video, you may not even watch it.
(You ski like a CSIA L4 is required when you compare me with a CSIA L4, otherwise, you have no standing to even making a comparision.)
You posted video doing mogul competition and you never show any video going down a mogul run straight on the fall line. You are plagiarizing like you said.
Nonsense, I never claimed that I'm going to ski “a mogul run straight on the fall line,“直線饅頭” is what norman claimed. You are plagiarizing yourself.
Let me repeat. Using fact to discussion one thing usually make it clear. The only thing that make a discussion become muddy (like every single thread here) is only because you're denying what's being wrong.
Actually, claiming I “denying being wrong” is you “弱慢族” standard denial, by “twisting the facts.” You haven't proved anything I said was“wrong,” and I do, even on this post, have proved plenty that you and you “弱慢族”said and did were wrong. So the conclusion is, for “every single thread here” last that long only because you “弱慢族” perpetuated denials, blah, blah, blah, and on going...
Not sure if you have the back ground knowledge to comprehend what I say, but ok, I'll try. Given a curved ski track, the relationship between the “angular acceleration” (a) (you do know what that is, don't you?), velocity (V), and the radius of the curved path (R) is given as R= V*V/a, and that is to say, mathematically, the longer the turn radius the faster the speed. The faster speed gives higher Kinetic Energy, which is given as KE=1/2* m*V*V, and the higher the KE gives higher performance. So, by observing the tracks that the skier left behind, we can estimate the energy the skier carried. When all else are equal, the straighter ski tracks carry higher energy than curvier one.
Barrowed from norman's photos,
Flatboard carving shows straighter line above than the pure-carving track below, “line-skiing” carries higher energy than “turn skiing.” And you don't know these relationship and cannot see that, your “tunnel vision” is proven.
:)
IS
無恥偽太極實致名歸，你講這理論是很合理。但是你在什麼地點能做到這樣，和你是能這樣做多久
第一，這樣的滑缐你只能在平坦的 trail run 才做得出來，但一定不能維持多久， skidding 便會出現。否則也不會用那麼長的時間來完成那條雪道
而你一到陡一點的坡便要橫滑， side slip, 還要左閃右避，怎快，那有什麼 energy , energy lost 就有你份。
taichiskiing 寫:What, you mean “boring person boring mind”? no, that was not a copy-n-paste, but you actual state of mind. And your “boring” posting continues.
Another thing, you don't know why and how a system is bigger than or contains another system. Have you heard about the story about the “best painting”in an art show got hanged upside down? No, not because you say a movie is boring then the movie is boring!
Yes and no, nowadays my “battle cry” to my proxy (those who ski with me) is “Slow Down.” The best way to ski spring snow trail is to slow down and stay on the “burns,” And you may not ski as “smooth” as her.
(I know you gappers don't really watch my videos, but I'll leave it here, just for the record and to keep the writing complete.)
Not sure if you have the back ground knowledge to comprehend what I say, but ok, I'll try. Given a curved ski track, the relationship between the “angular acceleration” (a) (you do know what that is, don't you?), velocity (V), and the radius of the curved path (R) is given as R= V*V/a, and that is to say, mathematically, the longer the turn radius the faster the speed. The faster speed gives higher Kinetic Energy, which is given as KE=1/2* m*V*V, and the higher the KE gives higher performance. So, by observing the tracks that the skier left behind, we can estimate the energy the skier carried. When all else are equal, the straighter ski tracks carry higher energy than curvier one.
Barrowed from norman's photos,
Flatboard carving shows straighter line above than the pure-carving track below, “line-skiing” carries higher energy than “turn skiing.” And you don't know these relationship and cannot see that, your “tunnel vision” is proven.
I think that those CSIA L4's demos are posted by your Whistler group, and you came out batting for them, you are “guity by asscociation.”
Actually, I did provide proof, you just denied it, and no, I don't think you know how to read the video, you may not even watch it.
(You ski like a CSIA L4 is required when you compare me with a CSIA L4, otherwise, you have no standing to even making a comparision.)
Nonsense, I never claimed that I'm going to ski “a mogul run straight on the fall line,“直線饅頭” is what norman claimed. You are plagiarizing yourself.
Actually, claiming I “denying being wrong” is you “弱慢族” standard denial, by “twisting the facts.” You haven't proved anything I said was“wrong,” and I do, even on this post, have proved plenty that you and you “弱慢族”said and did were wrong. So the conclusion is, for “every single thread here” last that long only because you “弱慢族” perpetuated denials, blah, blah, blah, and on going...
Ahh... no, “用 radius 長的 GS skis 也可以做出 radius 長的刻線”已經是“line skiing”，而這個“line skiing”，“with all else are equal,”一定比同一個人的“turn skiing”快‧ “Line skiing” is a higher skill.
Ahh... no, “用 radius 長的 GS skis 也可以做出 radius 長的刻線”已經是“line skiing”，而這個“line skiing”，“with all else are equal,”一定比同一個人的“turn skiing”快‧ “Line skiing” is a higher skill.
taichiskiing 寫:
Not sure if you have the back ground knowledge to comprehend what I say, but ok, I'll try. Given a curved ski track, the relationship between the “angular acceleration” (a) (you do know what that is, don't you?), velocity (V), and the radius of the curved path (R) is given as R= V*V/a, and that is to say, mathematically, the longer the turn radius the faster the speed. The faster speed gives higher Kinetic Energy, which is given as KE=1/2* m*V*V, and the higher the KE gives higher performance. So, by observing the tracks that the skier left behind, we can estimate the energy the skier carried. When all else are equal, the straighter ski tracks carry higher energy than curvier one.
Flatboard carving shows straighter line above than the pure-carving track below, “line-skiing” carries higher energy than “turn skiing.” And you don't know these relationship and cannot see that, your “tunnel vision” is proven.
You sure that's your mathematical and scientific prove? Your math and phy must be really bad to begin with or your just go copy-n-paste some formulas. I give you a 2nd chance to "correct" your answer here. Let some one to correct a so-call TaiChi master with so many years of claimed experience is a shameful thing to happen.
Could you also define what is "flatboard carving" and how does that different from pure-carving?
And could you also define what is "line skiing" and how that different from "turn skiing"?
Just don't want to keep arguing what is what. Let's listen to your definition and follow that.
