什麽是rail turn的動作

[Vicente]

Vicente, Good explanation!

The second skier in the video "http://video.yahoo.com/watch/7924124/20957969" seems much elegant. Just curious whether the knee angulation is the key to perform that kind of elegant skiing?

PSboy,

It's one of keys, not the all.

[Vicente]

我是說一模一樣，至少像我剪貼的那兩段一個紐西蘭跟美國的動作，至少幾乎一模一樣，只是紐西蘭的彎比較大一點而已。

這是一個標準的練習動作，這是可以極進接近的，只要到一定的水準，是可以做得到的。

[PSBoy]

...It's one of keys, not the all...

Thanks for your kind explanation!

BTW, What are the others and which is the most important?

[Vicente]

Thanks for your kind explanation!

BTW, What are the others and which is the most important?

Find your weak points, 多做 exercises and 多滑.

[PSBoy]

...多做 exercises and 多滑...

Good suggestion for all situations!

[skier666]

喔，我想說看得懂我的意思就好了，能少打幾個字也不錯囉。 nion (41):

RRT，或是　RR　Turn　更少字

[PSBoy]

Do you agree this view of knee angulation?

'I never focus on anything to do with knees when it comes to tipping the skis or increasing angles. If you concentrate on knees for angle development, you will end up with wrong conclusions about skiing. Look at the boots and skis, look for the angles there, they never lie. '

The source: http://pmts.org/pmtsforum/viewtopic.php ... 495#p30217

[Vicente]

..............................................................................................................................................................................................Look at the boots and skis, look for the angles there, they never lie. ...................................................................

[skier666]

Do you agree this view of knee angulation?

'I never focus on anything to do with knees when it comes to tipping the skis or increasing angles. If you concentrate on knees for angle development, you will end up with wrong conclusions about skiing. Look at the boots and skis, look for the angles there, they never lie. '

The source: http://pmts.org/pmtsforum/viewtopic.php ... 495#p30217

That is one point of view. It really depends on what is your reference point. He is right about his system but he is not always right about other systems.