And you whine like a little girl who cannot do her homework.
#263 回覆: 太極荒島
發表於 : 週三 2月 10, 2016 1:09 am
由 snowbender
pku 寫:小知老人還有什麼好講，他什麼都是一隨囗講下，毫無根據，你叫他找東西來支持，他那能夠找到
不過他現在應該知， COM 可以離開身體，北海道是乾澡，雪比Utah 更加乾，下次他去別的論壇，再不會做成笑話
Do you want to put that statement to epicski for a test? You’ll be their laughing stock in no time.
#264 回覆: 太極荒島
發表於 : 週三 2月 10, 2016 1:19 am
由 snowbender
B2L2 寫:已説了：你自己唔回，就正是因為你不能找到任何東西去支持你的謬論。
Blah, blah, blah... where is your answers for “Let’s see if you can ever once produce your “evidence” that CSIA/PSIA agree with your idea of what their idea about “CG” is”？“你自己唔回，就正是因為你不能找到任何東西去支持你的謬論”。
你自己不學，不改，不証，全部都証明了你的無知與無能。
現在只加上了 insult 別人的詞語，來做你的糖衣，只可說明你人品之差。indecent human 你確是一位。
有能力的就先証你自己的謬論，再談其他。
You are talking about yourself.
#265 回覆: 太極荒島
發表於 : 週三 2月 10, 2016 1:26 am
由 snowbender
pku 寫:片多的是
Not bad for a bunch of “flatlanders,”
We do that here too, when there’s snow, and I do it for $3.00 a day, so there’s no need to go anywhere else.
B2L2 寫:Yes, 片多的是, if 6 inches is enough to so call powder day for a no-body, then we have more than enough here:
for me, it was marginally enough. Nice sunny day make up the rest.
Why 6 inches? Because beyond that depth, the skiing’s maneuvers will not touch the old layer of ground, so the technique doesn’t change, so that 6 inches makes the minimum fresh snow depth for “powder skiing,” of course, it does imply the “virgin snow,” when it gets cut-up, game changes.
Why 6 inches? Because beyond that depth, the skiing’s maneuvers will not touch the old layer of ground, so the technique doesn’t change, so that 6 inches makes the minimum fresh snow depth for “powder skiing,” of course, it does imply the “virgin snow,” when it gets cut-up, game changes.
Flat land ? Then why you always post your skiing on those flat trails
$3.00 for 晨運 is already too much . 去公園晨運不用付錢，只懂躱在狐狸洞的小知老人，
#271 回复: 回覆: 太極荒島
發表於 : 週三 2月 10, 2016 2:48 am
由 B2L2
snowbender 寫:Blah, blah, blah... where is your answers for “Let’s see if you can ever once produce your “evidence” that CSIA/PSIA agree with your idea of what their idea about “CG” is”？“你自己唔回，就正是因為你不能找到任何東西去支持你的謬論”。
The answer was from your own mouth, little girl. Read what you wrote about CSIA and PSIA:
And we are still waiting for your proof of your ill-theory.
Oh that, I thought you were talking about the written manuals, nevertheless, this one could count as CSIA official documents as well, ok, you didn’t lie, but that “drawing” remains “totally wrong.” Here was my rebuttal, which you didn't even respond last time.
““Turn skiing” + “buzz words,” not physics. COM—Center of Mass—supposes to be inside the body and moves with body movements, not at the center of the screen as the clip depicted, @0:13~0:22. I saw at epicski, there's also a clip showing the same problem, wonder who is copying who.”
“COM—Center of Mass—supposes to be inside the body and moves with body movements, not at the center of the screen as the clip depicted, @0:13~0:22.”
As a technical discussion, you can either prove your ill-statement, or disprove mine, but you little knowledge have no scientific discipline, you cannot do neither, and you can only continue“whine like a little girl who cannot do her homeworks.” The joke is on you.
#279 回覆: 太極荒島
發表於 : 週四 2月 11, 2016 12:03 am
由 pku
snowbender 寫:Your “弱慢族”has no show, old man or not, I can’t see the invisible images, shame is on you.
