snowbender 寫:No need for such harsh runs, we are enjoying near perfect “spring skiing,” sunny, warm, soft snow, and above all, “no ice”; no, I don’t envy you have to work so hard to enjoy your skiing.
A “wedge” maybe is a your CSIA parallel skiing’s problem, but not a problem in “Flatboarding,” where two skis are not presented as two planks but one “single” pressure plate, i.e. a variable shape, or a changeable shape, so called “soft”“snowboard,” an improvement over your “two” fixed shape hard skis. And as it is totally “functional,” “form follows function,” “Flatboarding”. And given the conditions, you may not even be able to follow her.
Your wife and you aren't even able to ski my line, how you can catch up with me
See how steep the run is
你省省
David :
#368 回覆: 回复: 回覆: 回复: 回覆: 太極荒島
發表於 : 週六 3月 19, 2016 11:06 pm
由 snowbender
pku 寫:
Your wife and you aren't even able to ski my line, how you can catch up with me
See how steep the run is
你省省
你以為你能用“喊”的聲音大你就知道在說什麼？“Sucker Punch”‧
There’s nothing to see in that clip, and apparently, the place where you gappers ski, among to a “半山坡”, there are no “steep” hills. This is what we call it “steep” here around this neck of woods.
snowbender 寫:“True phylosophy”是這個世上最大的一個學問，研究的主題包括“什麼是‘真’”，“為什麼‘真’”，什麼是“人生”等等的實際又不著邊際的問題，中國古時統稱“形上學”‧長話短說，中國前人的“形上學”發展出我們中國的傳統文化及價值—道、釋、儒三〔大〕派—而西方的“形上學”演變成宗教與科學‧而科學的知識從“定義”/definition開始，然後“証明”你說的話/“定義”存在，然後我們再看你說的對不對—true or false—那是“數學”所研究的‧不是說你能說個CG與CM它們就有意義‧從整個mass到一點不是你說說就可以到的‧也不是你能亂問問題你就有知識，你知道你問題的答案嗎？或是你可以回答同樣的問題反過問“為什麼人造衛星或 space shuttle 在軌道上要打轉”？
snowbender 寫:The “center” of gravity exists only when gravity exists, nevertheless, the “center” of mass is alrways existed as the mass in question is always existed. In the modern days quantum theory, “生” comes with the “observation”‧And that is 中國“形上學”的“念起心生”。
There’s nothing to see in that clip, and apparently, the place where you gappers ski, among to a “半山坡”, there are no “steep” hills. This is what we call it “steep” here around this neck of woods.
這種自我標榜的醜事不需要講的那麼大聲，也不是你能放個影片就可以充數的，一）“average:18 degree”在這邊還稱不上藍線，你是“抖”不出來的，二）跟拍的人技術不夠，沒見你到底，跟拍失敗，三）你只能在無障礙的滑道上滑的暢順‧所以還是老話，你滑的我可以跟得“turn for turn”，而我滑的，你不能跟‧New clip!
這種自我標榜的醜事不需要講的那麼大聲，也不是你能放個影片就可以充數的，一）“average:18 degree”在這邊還稱不上藍線，你是“抖”不出來的，二）跟拍的人技術不夠，沒見你到底，跟拍失敗，三）你只能在無障礙的滑道上滑的暢順‧所以還是老話，你滑的我可以跟得“turn for turn”，而我滑的，你不能跟‧New clip!
這種自我標榜的醜事不需要講的那麼大聲，也不是你能放個影片就可以充數的，一）“average:18 degree”在這邊還稱不上藍線，你是“抖”不出來的，二）跟拍的人技術不夠，沒見你到底，跟拍失敗，三）你只能在無障礙的滑道上滑的暢順‧所以還是老話，你滑的我可以跟得“turn for turn”，而我滑的，你不能跟‧New clip!
