ams 寫:那我又等著看他的大法片啊.

大法片好呀，有時很多風格跟靈感就是這麼出來的。 nion (57):

norman 寫:大法片好呀，有時很多風格跟靈感就是這麼出來的。 nion (57):

是啊, 所以我才試這個, 試那個的, 滑的不好不重要, 玩一玩又多一點靈感. 失敗了便當上一課免費的.

PSBoy 寫:As a beginner, I think the key is versatile!

.................................................................................

ams 寫:Basically the turns are very close to carving and the major turning in lower C is by bending the skis and transition by using the rebounce... [/url]

Ams, nice skiing and thanks for giving me an idea of TM, cheers!

ams 寫:...that's what i see in Harald's Video and that's why i see minimum hit to the knee...[/url]

Do you mean PMTS tries to minimize jumping in the bumps?

norman 寫:Pmts系統可以到下列網站看看：

http://www.harbskisystems.com/lessonindex.htm

Thanks, Norman!

PSBoy 寫:Ams, nice skiing and thanks for giving me an idea of TM, cheers!

I m sure you ski better then I do, all i did in the vid is some drill that bending the ski, yet i slide.

PSBoy 寫:Do you mean PMTS tries to minimize jumping in the bumps?

you know better then i do, i can only see difference superficially(表面化的), all i see in the following two video is my knee didn't suffer any shock when my skiing is closer to pmts, despite the fact that some people just dont like slidding.
YouTube- tpl_mg1.MP4

vs on knee impact
YouTube- P7151365.AVI

ams 寫:I m sure you ski better then I do, all i did in the vid is some drill that bending the ski, yet i slide....

It is not possible because you are better than me a lot. Indeed, I have to thank for your kind explanation

PSBoy 寫:It is not possible because you are better than me a lot. Indeed, I have to thank for your kind explanation

你常常都是太客氣了, 我的滑雪技術不怎麼樣, 你比我強一點不出奇, 只是這不重要, 我們都不過是 student 級別的 tourist skier, 還有大師和其他大師遠遠在我們頭上. 我們是沒什麼好比較的.

ams 寫:你常常都是太客氣了...

To be honest, it is not 太客氣. I believe that respect is the key for the discussion with different parties.

你們２位都不用爭，我來做公證。你們再爭也不過是第２。因爲第一已經被大師訂了

skier666 寫:你們２位都不用爭，我來做公證。你們再爭也不過是第２。因爲第一已經被大師訂了

當然是大師在上, 但我們爭的是誰不會滑, 剛好相反啊.

我的經驗又說，厲害的往往是謙虛的。按這樣看，真正的實力是與名次到反

skier666 寫:我的經驗又說，厲害的往往是謙虛的。按這樣看，真正的實力是與名次到反

說真的我們住的地區遠離雪山, 都不過是談談滑雪, 打發一下時間, 認什麼高手, 低手都不過是笑話, 只有你們每年能滑 100天真雪的才有可能是滑雪大哥. 當然, 大師有大法之大成護身又另計.

我們滑雪從來不討論技術，大部分的時間都浪費在玩上面了。沒有練習，所以技術有限。懂得一些理論完全是拿來跟大師打嘴炮用的

skier666 寫:我們滑雪從來不討論技術，大部分的時間都浪費在玩上面了。沒有練習，所以技術有限。懂得一些理論完全是拿來跟大師打嘴炮用的

你也太謙虛了

skier666 寫:你們２位都不用爭，我來做公證。你們再爭也不過是第２。因爲第一已經被大師訂了

歉虛是美德，但是過份的歉虛、不實際的歉虛就只是“虛偽”/鄉愿了—
孔夫子 101‧有點肉麻。

:)
IS

ams 寫:他們會滑雪嗎? 看上去還不過是自然或 hip-bone width 吧?

YouTube- World Cup GS Stars Free Skiing

Alpine Racing, Carving , Wider stance.

Moguls, Bumps, powder, narrower stance.

pku 寫:Alpine Racing, Carving , Wider stance.

Moguls, Bumps, powder, narrower stance.

too simple explantion, please more detail.

beg 寫:too simple explantion, please more detail.

I just try to explain to Carver, not you.

You can ask 吹水大師

pku 寫:Alpine Racing, Carving , Wider stance.

Moguls, Bumps, powder, narrower stance.

It is understandable that on one want to have their skis spread by the powder or the mogul cone shape. narrow stance is the best way to avoid such mishap. However it takes very long time to form a habit to ski narrow stance as our daily walking don't walk with such stance. In fact PMTS requires their student to use narrow stance in any type of skiing. Without a narrow stance it is not easy to perform PMTS tipping. I was asked many many times to narrow my stance. It just that when skiing I tends to forget this requirement.