beg 寫:Yup, as i thought, 死剩把烏咀、too bad you don't believe PKU, he knows the best, when he says you win, you win. Now I can save my $5,000 and this is the third time you prove yourself
只有懦夫躲在電腦後面烏咀來表示自己神勇，無恥就不說了‧
So, our 老千 Taichisking computer virus crawling on.
beg 寫:for sure you"ll fail because your "雪杖朝天". Go to learn something real if you want to try PSIA again. Your pole is the point.
By the way snowrider just pass the L2 skiing because he learn hard.
跟屁蟲做的不錯，可惜無恥‧
A juvenile dog barks because its insecurity, the scariest dog barks the loudest and longest. 只有懦夫躲在電腦後面罵人來表示自己神勇，無恥就不說了‧
So, our human computer virus crawling on.
:)
IS
#65 回覆: Argument
發表於 : 週六 3月 03, 2012 2:19 pm
由 beg
taichiskiing 寫:跟屁蟲做的不錯，可惜無恥‧
A juvenile dog barks because its insecurity, the scariest dog barks the loudest and longest. 只有懦夫躲在電腦後面罵人來表示自己神勇，無恥就不說了‧
So, our human computer virus crawling on.
:)
IS
Yup, as i thought, 死剩把烏咀、只有懦夫躲在電腦後面烏咀來表示自己神勇，無恥就不說了‧
So, our 老千 Taichisking computer virus crawling on.
#66 回覆: Argument
發表於 : 週六 3月 03, 2012 2:23 pm
由 taichiskiing
pku 寫:[QUOTE=taichiskiing;14802
Given the fact that I can chase you guys down, I can demonstrate PSIA and CSIA's techniques anyway you want them, 所謂“行有餘力”, nevertheless, ski schools' techniques are NOT the end of skiing techniques themselves; only when you can breakout your "school's"/style's limitation, you can then reach to highest/simplest level of skiing: you think and the skis move,“心到手到全自動”. What do you think, will this guy pass PSIA/CSIA instructor level？
:)
IS
his skiing is pretty. , should have no problem passing csia level 2 if he wants to imitate the form If he is willing to train level 3 by whistler ski school and he can ski 100 days a season. Should be able to get it within 2 season. Level 4 hard to say but for sure to give up your float boarding[/QUOTE]
pku 寫:
至於 Pisa 和 Csia 的要求，你是很難做到，你是太極滑雪宗師，可必要滑他們方法, you've already achieved 心到手到全自動, not many CSIA or PSIA guys can do it.
To be frank, my buddy was an ex PSIA clinician, which is the one who qualified to coach the coaches (conduct a clinic), which is about your CSIA L4. So, your observation has missed by two upper levels; maybe that's what you've missed on me too.
The two clips show that I ski compitable to his, which proves one thing I've said, ultimately/at the highest end, all systems/styles would merge into "line-skiing," which is the "simplest form" of skiing, and requires the least body movements. And that's what I call "move beyond all systems/styles."
:)
IS
#67 回覆: Argument
發表於 : 週六 3月 03, 2012 2:29 pm
由 taichiskiing
pku 寫:Some of us went skiing the powder (15")When the chair just open last evening and they said our young gun simon did pretty good. We didn't ski much trees once a lady from hong kong took us down a steep tree runs I never ski before and it's a bit scary at the beginning Now there is a group of snowboarders from hk can ski the tight trees line very good. I don't dare to following them ，，whistler 的樹林，樹與樹之間沒有heavenly的樹 那麼，所以會比較多大bump 所以見你滑時見不到bump ，很想試試。
No, you don't see the bumps only because the size of bumps and the grade of the slopes don't usually show up on the video clips. Unless powder days and one day after, there are always bumps in the trees, as the bumps are formed depending on the grades of the slope, just as in the mogul fields, and the condition worsen by the snowboarders dodge in and out with their tight turns and sideslipping. And most people ski trees only ski the open areas in the trees, so essentially make a "mogul run" inside the trees. So, to be able to ski trees one must also need to know how to ski moguls. But as I've said, the "real" tree skiing is to ski around the trees, not just inside a treed area. Sierra-at-Tahoe has tougher tree runs than Heavenly,
In my opinion, because tree skiing allows you to ski beyond the "trails"/off-piste, and to connect the lifts through trees, which really opens up the skiable areas, as well as to expand skiing to the "whole mountain," the ability to ski trees is thus a standard requirement for "all-mountain" skiers.
CSIA is not the highest end. Racing type is consider the highest end. To be able to ski fast and turn without much lost in energy. Instructor is modifying the technique to be able to ski everywhere with less energy lost when turning. We need to set the edge early and do round turns. Racer is cross the fall line much less than instructor most of the time your float boarding is totally different you skid a lot but your body follows the skis well to maintain balance so the way you ski more safe while we try to push the skis away from our body to set the edge and angulate and get back the body on the top of the skis . This moment is what Norman called 姿態零。it's way more complicate and much harder to do perfectly and is harder to get back to balance . But if doing it go then the product is efficient and effortless skiing. That' why you can beat many lower level instructors in speed since they aren't skillful but only imitate the form.
Guess here's where we differ; I don't considered the "pure-carve" is the highest end of the skiing technique, and successful racers must have a well-rounded balance.
see how Bode Miller turned his carving into a sideslipping and shorten the "line" @:20 sec and see also how he skis without“姿態歸零”, where he just puts his weight onto the coming dominant foot and starts to turn; that's "running" the line, or ski like running. Ultimately, you don't see Bode's skiing has any "form" that resembles to what you average racing coaches said. So again, "formless," that's what I've said, "ski beyond all systems/styles."
I think you are very knowledgeable in skiing as long as other didn't put you down and step down your taichi floatboarding. You are also right that lots of racer only so well on the courses but once they want to learn to ski those other thing, they can become the best. Like Harald Harb, Richard Berger and almost all the Japanese demonstrators. They all have race background and they are so used to speed. Your balance is very good so you can really turn at will within your comfort zone.
Yes, I do know what I'm talking about, and if you learn my way of balance, your skiing would also improve. Ski well balanced in speed is what makes skiing "graceful," and that's the "only" difference between L2 and L3.
To be frank, my buddy was an ex PSIA clinician, which is the one who qualified to coach the coaches (conduct a clinic), which is about your CSIA L4. So, your observation has missed by two upper levels; maybe that's what you've missed on me too.
The two clips show that I ski compitable to his, which proves one thing I've said, ultimately/at the highest end, all systems/styles would merge into "line-skiing," which is the "simplest form" of skiing, and requires the least body movements. And that's what I call "move beyond all systems/styles."
:)
IS
You don't have to look for approve on the web. Just simply retry the PSIA or CSIA then the instructor will be very happy to assist you. Of course it is your own choice to learn it or stay in your comfort zone .
#69 回覆: Argument
發表於 : 週六 3月 03, 2012 2:44 pm
由 taichiskiing
beg 寫:Yup, as i thought, 死剩把烏咀、只有懦夫躲在電腦後面烏咀來表示自己神勇，無恥就不說了‧
So, our 老千 Taichisking computer virus crawling on.
beg 寫:You don't have to look for approve on the web. Just simply retry the PSIA or CSIA then the instructor will be very happy to assist you. Of course it is your own choice to learn it or stay in your comfort zone .
跟屁蟲做的不錯，可惜無恥‧
A juvenile dog barks because its insecurity, the scariest dog barks the loudest and longest. 只有懦夫躲在電腦後面罵人來表示自己神勇，無恥就不說了‧
So, our human computer virus crawling on.
:)
IS
#70 回覆: Argument
發表於 : 週六 3月 03, 2012 2:50 pm
由 beg
taichiskiing 寫:跟屁蟲做的不錯，可惜無恥‧
A juvenile dog barks because its insecurity, the scariest dog barks the loudest and longest. 只有懦夫躲在電腦後面罵人來表示自己神勇，無恥就不說了‧
So, our human computer virus crawling on.
:)
IS
Yup, as i thought, 死剩把烏咀、只有懦夫躲在電腦後面烏咀來表示自己神勇，無恥就不說了‧
So, our 老千 Taichisking computer virus crawling on.
#71 回覆: Argument
發表於 : 週六 3月 03, 2012 3:00 pm
由 pku
taichiskiing 寫:
Yes, I do know what I'm talking about, and if you learn my way of balance, your skiing would also improve. Ski well balanced in speed is what makes skiing "graceful," and that's the "only" difference between L2 and L3.
:)
IS
As Skier888 said, you ski fast on the gentle groom but need to ski 前前後後左左右右 on bigger bumps and the steep. So the way you balance miss something.
Ski fast on the gentle groom is not graceful for me. To be able to ski fast and turn at will is graceful for me.
Watch the video at 1:12 to 1:30 , the guy skiing fast big turns and suddenly do 2 short turns, for me this is graceful
To be frank, my buddy was an ex PSIA clinician, which is the one who qualified to coach the coaches (conduct a clinic), which is about your CSIA L4. So, your observation has missed by two upper levels; maybe that's what you've missed on me too.
The two clips show that I ski compitable to his, which proves one thing I've said, ultimately/at the highest end, all systems/styles would merge into "line-skiing," which is the "simplest form" of skiing, and requires the least body movements. And that's what I call "move beyond all systems/styles."
:)
IS
I am 100% sure your friend can't pass CSIA L4 right now.
You can't pass PSIA l2 is because you refuse to ski what they want to see.
A person can ski what he wants after he pass the PSIA or CSIA exam. but need to ski the way the system want during the exam. If one left the system for a long time, it's not easy for him to pass.
#73 回覆: Argument
發表於 : 週六 3月 03, 2012 3:18 pm
由 pku
norman 寫:我看過你在萬座的影片，你還放著，昨天在找影片時又看到了一次，你會在鬆雪內打滾是正常的。
ps. 不是我想推三推四，而是有時事情不是自己說要去做能能去做的，不然做完後爽一時，後果還是蠻大的。
#75 回覆: Argument
發表於 : 週六 3月 03, 2012 11:42 pm
由 taichiskiing
beg 寫:Yup, as i thought, 死剩把烏咀、只有懦夫躲在電腦後面烏咀來表示自己神勇，無恥就不說了‧
So, our 老千 Taichisking computer virus crawling on.
跟屁蟲做的不錯，可惜無恥‧
A juvenile dog barks because its insecurity, the scariest dog barks the loudest and longest. 只有懦夫躲在電腦後面罵人來表示自己神勇，無恥就不說了‧
So, our human computer virus crawling on.
:)
IS
#76 回覆: Argument
發表於 : 週六 3月 03, 2012 11:47 pm
由 taichiskiing
pku 寫:As Skier888 said, you ski fast on the gentle groom but need to ski 前前後後左左右右 on bigger bumps and the steep. So the way you balance miss something.
Skier888 is 半吊子, just like that you have missed upper two levels of my buddy skiing, he doesn't know what he is talking about. Skier888 has never seen me skiing in person, and I don't think that he would ever will, so he is like you, has no idea how I ski; nevertheless, you are at least CSIA officially trained instructor, but cannot spot "good skiing," your observation has missed something, or you didn't tell yourself the truth.
Ski fast on the gentle groom is not graceful for me. To be able to ski fast and turn at will is graceful for me.
That's only your idea, but "turn-skiing" is never looked graceful to me. As for "turn at will," see if you guys can follow him,
A person can ski what he wants after he pass the PSIA or CSIA exam. but need to ski the way the system want during the exam. If one left the system for a long time, it's not easy for him to pass.
"Real" high level skiing is like riding bicycle, once you've learned it, you'd never forget, it's the timeless skills what I call "high level skiing." You lack observation ability of a L2.
see how Bode Miller turned his carving into a sideslipping and shorten the "line" @:20 sec and see also how he skis without“姿態歸零”, where he just puts his weight onto the coming dominant foot and starts to turn; that's "running" the line, or ski like running. Ultimately, you don't see Bode's skiing has any "form" that resembles to what you average racing coaches said. So again, "formless," that's what I've said, "ski beyond all systems/styles."
norman 寫:你說的秒數時間不對，因為姿勢歸零是我一直在提出的，所以我就為這短片將姿勢歸零的時機位置剪出來，只有姿勢歸零後才能做tipping，肩膀、膝蓋、腳掌向前同一方向，我的定義就是這樣子而已，所以姿勢歸零練到後來是沒有固定位置的，只有一個要點，姿勢歸零→傾腳→姿勢歸零，說的簡單，但如果不知道如何做，也是很難做到的，即使做到而時機位置及加壓的力量位置及速度不對也是沒有用的，但這個確實是整個動作的起點及收尾。
taichiskiing 寫:Skier888 is 半吊子, just like that you have missed upper two levels of my buddy skiing, he doesn't know what he is talking about. Skier888 has never seen me skiing in person, and I don't think that he would ever will, so he is like you, has no idea how I ski; nevertheless, you are at least CSIA officially trained instructor, but cannot spot "good skiing," your observation has missed something, or you didn't tell yourself the truth.
That's only your idea, but "turn-skiing" is never looked graceful to me. As for "turn at will," see if you guys can follow him,
"Real" high level skiing is like riding bicycle, once you've learned it, you'd never forget, it's the timeless skills what I call "high level skiing." You lack observation ability of a L2.
:)
IS
佢滑成這樣，同我個 L3-1/2義妹滑樹林，死九成，
你睇人地psia 那麼多要求，又bump，dynamic short turn 鬼多野，你個friend只在360 ；360 轉，怎知佢可不可過，，
