#1 Level 6
發表於 : 週日 6月 13, 2010 3:03 pm
看完了1~7級,覺得小朋友的狠勁及厲害,我從頭輪到尾了。:fm (36):
利害,利害. 但大師也不用太謙虛, 你的功力已經相距身人合一不遠了. 只是門派上和年紀上的分別罷norman 寫:看完了1~7級,覺得小朋友的狠勁及厲害,我從頭輪到尾了。:fm (36):
lelo 兄太謙虛了.lelo 寫:................................................................................按照這個等級,我應該只算 the controlled skier 的第一級而已 .....
不是謙虛,這是影片送上 epicski 讓專家評定的結果!Vicente 寫:lelo 兄太謙虛了.![]()
What is CSCF stand for,怎麼都是小孩在示範?我想他們滑是Rail Road Track (RRT) turn, which is a waterdown version of pure-carve technique,不錯,但是turn-skiing總是有點單調。
My leader got the Level 1 ( entry Level )CSCF Coach 10 years ago but he knows nothing about racing. He only know how to carve a little bit but he is too scare about carving on steep groom run. He think carving is more for racing, not too much use for all mountain skiing for recreation skier.taichiskiing 寫:What is CSCF stand for,怎麼都是小孩在示範?我想他們滑是Rail Road Track (RRT) turn, which is a waterdown version of pure-carve technique,不錯,但是turn-skiing總是有點單調。
:)
IS
Your leader sounds like a solid skier. I carve too, just I don't like the "jerky" feeling of the "tipping," so most of times I do flatboarding,pku 寫:My leader got the Level 1 ( entry Level )CSCF Coach 10 years ago but he knows nothing about racing. He only know how to carve a little bit but he is too scare about carving on steep groom run. He think carving is more for racing, not too much use for all mountain skiing for recreation skier.
Our leader skiing is OK but still not really impressive, still far from the following guy. I hope one day I can ski as fast as him on the bumps.taichiskiing 寫:Your leader sounds like a solid skier. I carve too, just I don't like the "jerky" feeling of the "tipping," so most of times I do flatboarding,
YouTube- Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: flatskiing
:)
IS
He's a decent bump skier, nevertheless, nothing really special for bump skiing (his "line" spread too wide for his "poled skiing", which made his run a little unstable), why him? Do you know him, or you just lift a link out of the internet?pku 寫:Our leader skiing is OK but still not really impressive, still far from the following guy. I hope one day I can ski as fast as him on the bumps.
YouTube- Bumps
You have very good balance but he skis faster.taichiskiing 寫:He's a decent bump skier, nevertheless, nothing really special for bump skiing (his "line" spread too wide for his "poled skiing", which made his run a little unstable), why him? Do you know him, or you just lift a link out of the internet?
There was time, before the terrain park, I used to ski nothing but moguls all day, but now I only do it occasionally,
YouTube- Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: mogul
:)
IS
Well, my skiing safety philosophy is to slow down on difficult conditions, balance first and to enjoy the speed only when conditions permit.pku 寫:You have very good balance but he skis faster.
The guy's bumps skiing is more carving so the line is not too straight.
Will that have to do with age? I find that I can't take the same beating anymore. Injuries takes months, sometimes years to heal.taichiskiing 寫:Well, my skiing safety philosophy is to slow down on difficult conditions, balance first and to enjoy the speed only when conditions permit.
He may have used some edges on turning (dynamic short turns), but don't think that he has carved, especially on his demon on the open legs Christie turn, that's pretty bad [example] for a teaching demonstration. Given that zipper-line mogul technique is much more efficient and fast than the carving turn is on mogul, I don't think that carving is a good choice/technique for mogul skiing.
:)
IS
That's quite true; knees are the first thing to go when we grow older, and all the high end mogul skiing techniques require on good knees, that's why I don't do mogul much after the terrain park came out on the scene; superpipe has no less fun but much less stress on the knees,skier666 寫:Will that have to do with age? I find that I can't take the same beating anymore. Injuries takes months, sometimes years to heal.
You are right, he is not carving but he use quite a bit of edge to deflect the skis to turn,it's more of a canadian high end instructor skiing technique. The turn is more like an arc. Different from the freestyle mogul skiing which is more like a straight line. That's why the freestyle moguls is faster ( Straight down )taichiskiing 寫:Well, my skiing safety philosophy is to slow down on difficult conditions, balance first and to enjoy the speed only when conditions permit.
He may have used some edges on turning (dynamic short turns), but don't think that he has carved, especially on his demon on the open legs Christie turn, that's pretty bad [example] for a teaching demonstration. Given that zipper-line mogul technique is much more efficient and fast than the carving turn is on mogul, I don't think that carving is a good choice/technique for mogul skiing.
:)
IS
His parallel turns are fine, I just don't understand why he introduced the open Christie turn in turning on moguls. He maybe a CSIA level 3... but his mogul run was too unstable for a level 4.pku 寫:You are right, he is not carving but he use quite a bit of edge to deflect the skis to turn,it's more of a canadian high end instructor skiing technique. The turn is more like an arc. Different from the freestyle mogul skiing which is more like a straight line. That's why the freestyle moguls is faster ( Straight down )
About the open christie turn is just he is not doing the parellel turn perfectly ( so non parallel leg movement show like a christie ). But it's pretty good for aggressive skiing on bumps for Canadian instructor. His skiing is at less a CSIA strong level 3 or a Level 4 instrucotr. That's what I think.
He show the chrsite because he doesn't have the speed to set the skis on edge a bit away from the body.taichiskiing 寫:His parallel turns are fine, I just don't understand why he introduced the open Christie turn in turning on moguls. He maybe a CSIA level 3... but his mogul run was too unstable for a level 4.
:)
IS