先決條件是　non-carving 彎，　non-carving 彎　的特徵就是只有很低或很小的離心力，　那麼這平衡是怎麼形成的，　可能的嗎，　或者是 transient balance? 就是說是過度性的，　很快的被另一平衡所取代，　這可能是 recovery move 也可能是高級技術，　不知在各門派（ eg, 大法）的解釋為何．　:face (334):

ams 寫:先決條件是　non-carving 彎，　non-carving 彎　的特徵就是只有很低或很小的離心力，　那麼這平衡是怎麼形成的，　可能的嗎，　或者是 transient balance? 就是說是過度性的，　很快的被另一平衡所取代，　這可能是 recovery move 也可能是高級技術，　不知在各門派（ eg, 大法）的解釋為何．　:face (334):

They sound like some disjointed jargons; though they may make a good non-carving turns, but none is "required"/先決條件 for a good non-carving skiing. As“還沒通的人分，通的人是不分的”, a real“大法”can do both PSIA and PMTS, as well as any other XSIA system, at ease and more, watch that two footed release without o-frame at around :24 sec,
YouTube- Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: free skiing, Kirkwood


:)
IS

ams 寫:先決條件是　non-carving 彎，　non-carving 彎　的特徵就是只有很低或很小的離心力，　那麼這平衡是怎麼形成的，　可能的嗎，　或者是 transient balance? 就是說是過度性的，　很快的被另一平衡所取代，　這可能是 recovery move 也可能是高級技術，　不知在各門派（ eg, 大法）的解釋為何．　:face (334):

我的定義很簡單，只要您能真實在像站在平地上一樣(不要過度加壓)，滑完上半個C就行了，以文字上來講early edge是在high-C的起端。

non-carving 彎應該就是slipping turns。

理論上最高穩定的滑法是無轉換重心，而是延用重心，只是姿勢動作改變而已。

以上是個人的見解囉。

PMS is movement based and PSIA is not. PSIA can cover what PMS has and it does over time. PSIA standard is defined by committee, not individual. I don't think PSIA tries to limit ones ski movements. This maybe why BB defined expert the way he did.

Most of us don't care what systems we learn from. To many people, HH does present some of his material better than PSIA. That is why some skiers gravitate to his approach but that does not mean skiers only want to learn PMS.

skier666 寫:PMS is movement based and PSIA is not. PSIA can cover what PMS has and it does over time. PSIA standard is defined by committee, not individual. I don't think PSIA tries to limit ones ski movements. This maybe why BB defined expert the way he did.

Most of us don't care what systems we learn from. To many people, HH does present some of his material better than PSIA. That is why some skiers gravitate to his approach but that does not mean skiers only want to learn PMS.

I think that PMS should be PMTS, Primary Movements Teaching System.

:)
IS

skier666 寫: Most of us don't care what systems we learn from. To many people, HH does present some of his material better than PSIA. That is why some skiers gravitate to his approach but that does not mean skiers only want to learn PMS.

Agree.