1 頁 (共 2 頁)

#1 Pole plant

發表於 : 週一 4月 04, 2011 11:59 pm
PSBoy
Hi Taichiskiing,

I saw the video but don't understand the mechanism of your pole plant. Could you give me some hints?

YouTube - Monoskiing


Thanks,
PSBoy

#2 回覆: Pole plant

發表於 : 週二 4月 05, 2011 1:47 am
pku
PSBoy 寫:Hi Taichiskiing,

I saw the video but don't understand the mechanism of your pole plant. Could you give me some hints?

YouTube - Monoskiing

Thanks,
PSBoy
You won't be able to understand, you just need to say high end skiing with pole plants. Otherwise, he'll say you are little knowledge

#3 回覆: Pole plant

發表於 : 週二 4月 05, 2011 7:19 am
beg
PSBoy 寫:Hi Taichiskiing,

I saw the video but don't understand the mechanism of your pole plant. Could you give me some hints?

YouTube - Monoskiing

Thanks,
PSBoy
I believe this is professional duuble pole plant. :face (330): :face (330): :face (330):
pku 寫:Before the 大膽突破, one must have a sound fundamental skill.

Like the 2011 Korean demo team is trying to put their martial art into their skiing. Since those demonstrator got very sound fundamental skill so the outcome is still strong skiing.

But some low level skier try to 大膽突破, the outcome is just a joke. e.g. 雪杖朝天
説起”四脚朝天&雪杖朝天”、太直及若至Crazy Morman 也不敢回應的。 :face (334): :face (334): :face (334):
taichiskiing 寫:In your dream, maybe, and you still have to qualify your skiing, shameless Whistler Group.

:)
IS
In your dream, maybe、and you still have to prove you are human, shameless taichi monkey. :face (50): :face (50): :face (50):

#4 回覆: Pole plant

發表於 : 週二 4月 05, 2011 11:23 am
taichiskiing
PSBoy 寫:Hi Taichiskiing,

I saw the video but don't understand the mechanism of your pole plant. Could you give me some hints?

Thanks,
PSBoy
YouTube - Monoskiing



I'm not sure, that was my first/only time on "mono ski." "Mono ski" really is one piece "big" ski, so the skier is always dealing with "double fall-line," so to balance, one must keep turning; Windeln maybe is the best technique for it. To use poles on mono ski is pretty much the same way as on two skis, the only difference is that your feet no longer be able to separate, so you have to figure new way to "unweight," which is to bend one knee. You may see some trace on that move. Are you interesting on mono skiing?

:)
IS

#5 回覆: Pole plant

發表於 : 週二 4月 05, 2011 12:31 pm
snowrider
A friend.

#6 回覆: Pole plant

發表於 : 週二 4月 05, 2011 12:45 pm
Slogger
taichiskiing 寫: I'm not sure, that was my first/only time on "mono ski." "Mono ski" really is one piece "big" ski, so the skier is always dealing with "double fall-line," so to balance, one must keep turning; Windeln maybe is the best technique for it. To use poles on mono ski is pretty much the same way as on two skis, the only difference is that your feet no longer be able to separate, so you have to figure new way to "unweight," which is to bend one knee. You may see some trace on that move. Are you interesting on mono skiing?

:)
IS
Monoski has been around for many years.
If you are from the "old school" era and competent with parallel skiing, you should not have to use this "one bend knee" method. This "one bend knee" is unheard of in Europe.
IMO, the problem was you were too slow and not going straight down the fall line enough.

#7 回覆: Pole plant

發表於 : 週二 4月 05, 2011 12:58 pm
skier888
snowrider 寫:A friend.
with very expensive taste :face (327):

#8 回覆: Pole plant

發表於 : 週二 4月 05, 2011 11:23 pm
taichiskiing
Slogger 寫:Monoski has been around for many years.
If you are from the "old school" era and competent with parallel skiing, you should not have to use this "one bend knee" method. This "one bend knee" is unheard of in Europe.
IMO, the problem was you were too slow and not going straight down the fall line enough.

So you didn't read my "first/only time" doing mono skiing? No, I have no interesting in doing the mono ski, what's your point? Do you do mono skiing? Let's see how you do it, or just a gapper pretend he knows something?

:)
IS

#9 回覆: Pole plant

發表於 : 週三 4月 06, 2011 7:34 am
Slogger
Mr. Shen,

One does not need to be a chef to tell a dish is delicious or foul.

I cannot ski but I can give see the difference:

YouTube - MONOSKI REVIVAL 2008

#10 回覆: Pole plant

發表於 : 週三 4月 06, 2011 8:34 pm
PSBoy
Thanks, Taichiskiing.

I think mono ski is good for powder skiing but no talent to learn : (

BTW, I like your balance skill. How do you acquire this skill?

#11 回覆: Pole plant

發表於 : 週三 4月 06, 2011 9:28 pm
taichiskiing
Slogger 寫:Mr. Shen,

One does not need to be a chef to tell a dish is delicious or foul.

I cannot ski but I can give see the difference:

YouTube - MONOSKI REVIVAL 2008

"That's what makes you a 'gapper.'"

:)
IS

#12 回覆: Pole plant

發表於 : 週三 4月 06, 2011 9:33 pm
taichiskiing
PSBoy 寫:Thanks, Taichiskiing.

I think mono ski is good for powder skiing but no talent to learn : (

BTW, I like your balance skill. How do you acquire this skill?

Taichi Skiing, "push feet"/推腳 with gravity.

:)
IS

#13 回覆: Pole plant

發表於 : 週三 4月 06, 2011 10:57 pm
pku
taichiskiing 寫:Taichi Skiing, "push feet"/推腳 with gravity.

:)
IS
You can't even move you lower joint and claim that you are push feet. If you push feet well, you should show as some dynamic skking on GunBarrel. your so call good balance is only because of skiing almost everyday for years.

#14 回覆: Pole plant

發表於 : 週四 4月 07, 2011 8:17 am
taichiskiing
pku 寫:You can't even move you lower joint and claim that you are push feet. If you push feet well, you should show as some dynamic skking on GunBarrel. your so call good balance is only because of skiing almost everyday for years.
Why do I sense skier888's "sour grapes" mentality? First, you have no idea what "push feet" is, and second, your little knowledge doesn't know what "dynamic skiing" is, and third, "good balance" makes "good skiing," and you slip into denial and become a "sour grapes"? Fancy mutation.

:)
IS

#15 回覆: Pole plant

發表於 : 週四 4月 07, 2011 8:35 am
beg
Now let's take a look why Taichi got kick out of PSIA L1 exam because of pole plant pointing to high end. :face (50): :face (50): :face (50):


YouTube - Monoskiing

#16 回覆: Pole plant

發表於 : 週四 4月 07, 2011 8:35 am
pku
taichiskiing 寫:Why do I sense skier888's "sour grapes" mentality? First, you have no idea what "push feet" is, and second, your little knowledge doesn't know what "dynamic skiing" is, and third, "good balance" makes "good skiing," and you slip into denial and become a "sour grapes"? Fancy mutation.

:)
IS
The following are all dynamic skiing, not the way you ski

YouTube - carving tecnica 2


YouTube - 丸山貴雄のスキースタイル3 transform


YouTube - 丸山貴雄のスキースタイルevolution


YouTube - 名手から学ぶ6つのテクニック


Stubborn Old Man

#17 回覆: Pole plant

發表於 : 週四 4月 07, 2011 11:26 am
taichiskiing

Fancy videos, can you do it, gapper?

Dynamic enough, nevertheless, see if they can cut through these trees,

YouTube - Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: tree skiing, Canyon Express trees, Heavenly



:)
IS

#18 回覆: Pole plant

發表於 : 週四 4月 07, 2011 11:44 am
pku
taichiskiing 寫:Fancy videos, can you do it, gapper?

Dynamic enough, nevertheless, see if they can cut through these trees,

YouTube - Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: tree skiing, Canyon Express trees, Heavenly


:)
IS
They can't cut through tress since they know how to ski the trees fast, ski on the open space

#19 回覆: Pole plant

發表於 : 週四 4月 07, 2011 11:58 am
taichiskiing
pku 寫:They can't cut through tress since they know how to ski the trees fast, ski on the open space

No, if there are no trees involved, that is not "trees skiing" but "ski on the open space."

:)
IS

#20 回覆: Pole plant

發表於 : 週四 4月 07, 2011 12:04 pm
pku
taichiskiing 寫:No, if there are no trees involved, that is not "trees skiing" but "ski on the open space."

:)
IS
Your tree skiing always get stuck in the tress.