Argument

[taichiskiing]

佢滑成這樣，同我個 L3-1/2義妹滑樹林，死九成，

Then I'd be really interesting to see how your L3-1/2義妹滑樹林, any video of her tree skiing? Haven't met any lady skiers that is aggressive in tree-skiing, and my friend is the best tree-skier I've ever skied with,

Flatboarding/Line-skiing: off-piste, Maggie's canyon, right traverse, Heavenly - YouTube

你睇人地psia 那麼多要求，又bump，dynamic short turn 鬼多野，你個friend只在360 ；360 轉，怎知佢可不可過，，

Actually, as an ex PSIA Clinician, he can do those PSIA maneuvers better than anybody on the mountains, including most of ski intructors.

好似你這樣滑去考csia 不用考，考官見到已經笑死，他會叫佢幫幇忙，去找你處。

No, only the 考官的小見識 would be being laughed at, I guess.

" White Pass Turn " 佢地 PSIA 唔考的東西，做得好冇用。，

Guess here is where you lose your wits; you only know to look the "external forms" (like Norman does, and why I have a feeling that I am talking to a different person?), and have no idea how internally produce "forces" to perform those maneuvers.

"White Pass Turn" is a drill to practice turning and balance on the inside ski. Most of skiing turning failures are due to the misguided inside ski in the way, and prevent the skier's smooth turning, so, taking care of inside ski before you turn guarantees you a smooth and efficient turning. "White Pass Turn" enhances that ability, so it is on PSIA L2 exam item, iirc.

I don't think that examiner would laugh to death, only little knowledge does.

你用雪杖是用你的太極心法，化劍為杖，考官也不是太極高手，怎看得出來，只有弱慢白日夢大師看得出你功力已有L4的水準，我只能看出一點點的太極劍法。

No, my pole-plants maybe old school; nevertheless, they are efficient and functional (for a function that is not needed in the first place), and“點了轉”is the "industry" standard, why do you think that you CSIA examiners cannot see it? In facts, given lacking consistent uses of pole plants in your demo tapes, I don't think the examiner would really care how poles are being used, if pole-plant is not the specified task; do you CSIA have special demo tape specified for "pole-plant"?

Freestyle 世界冠軍去考csia l3 滑bumps 時用比賽的滑法，也不會合格，要考人家的東西，便要做人家的要求，我沒有說你考不過psia 不能夠教，只要有人喜歡跟你學，你便有資格教。

I think that you lower rank instructors really hold on to your ski schools' standards too tight and too highly; if you fail a world cup freestyle champion on mogul skiing skill test because it doesn't meet your standards, then your standards may be called into question. Johnny Mosley was given L3 by Heavenly after he won the Olympic Gold in 1998. The real world of skiing is really bigger than your CSIA's teaching. There is no law in American that prohibits an uncert ski instructor to teach skiing.

:)
IS

[taichiskiing]

你說的是彎的結束點及開始點(我可以另創一個名詞，我們就叫這個點，是「始終點」)，再下來到20秒是折腰傾腳到底時。但這些都不是我說的姿勢歸零。

在這用詞上是我提出來了，我有我的定義，只是希望你不要混淆我的定義就好了。

沒人要混淆你的定義，“姿勢歸零”在中文上有一定意義的，你只是不知道你在說什麼‧你說你在練“姿勢歸零”，不是嗎？而我是說高手滑雪是不用這“過度”/transient的技術的‧你的不學不長的辯，結果又掉回你練直排輪“進階點杖術”時的想法，你認為你能定義/講你就是對的？“換腳時〔重心〕歸零”及“點了轉”都是有一定的時效的‧你做不到，所以是你自己的定義“混淆”；你解釋解釋不出來，做又做不到，所以說你是“練了白練”‧隨便你啦。

:)
IS

[beg]

Then I'd be really interesting to see how your L3-1/2義妹滑樹林, any video of her tree skiing? Haven't met any lady skiers that is aggressive in tree-skiing, and my friend is the best tree-skier I've ever skied with,

Flatboarding/Line-skiing: off-piste, Maggie's canyon, right traverse, Heavenly - YouTube




Actually, as an ex PSIA Clinician, he can do those PSIA maneuvers better than anybody on the mountains, including most of ski intructors.



No, only the 考官的小見識 would be being laughed at, I guess.



Guess here is where you lose your wits; you only know to look the "external forms" (like Norman does, and why I have a feeling that I am talking to a different person?), and have no idea how internally produce "forces" to perform those maneuvers.

"White Pass Turn" is a drill to practice turning and balance on the inside ski. Most of skiing turning failures are due to the misguided inside ski in the way, and prevent the skier's smooth turning, so, taking care of inside ski before you turn guarantees you a smooth and efficient turning. "White Pass Turn" enhances that ability, so it is on PSIA L2 exam item, iirc.

I don't think that examiner would laugh to death, only little knowledge does.



No, my pole-plants maybe old school; nevertheless, they are efficient and functional (for a function that is not needed in the first place), and“點了轉”is the "industry" standard, why do you think that you CSIA examiners cannot see it? In facts, given lacking consistent uses of pole plants in your demo tapes, I don't think the examiner would really care how poles are being used, if pole-plant is not the specified task; do you CSIA have special demo tape specified for "pole-plant"?



I think that you lower rank instructors really hold on to your ski schools' standards too tight and too highly; if you fail a world cup freestyle champion on mogul skiing skill test because it doesn't meet your standards, then your standards may be called into question. Johnny Mosley was given L3 by Heavenly after he won the Olympic Gold in 1998. The real world of skiing is really bigger than your CSIA's teaching. There is no law in American that prohibits an uncert ski instructor to teach skiing.

:)
IS

你又要問人,人家答左你你又要磯磯圪圪、咁你自己去考咪一清二楚囉,又怕痕又怕痛
。

[beg]

沒人要混淆你的定義，“姿勢歸零”在中文上有一定意義的，你只是不知道你在說什麼‧你說你在練“姿勢歸零”，不是嗎？而我是說高手滑雪是不用這“過度”/transient的技術的‧你的不學不長的辯，結果又掉回你練直排輪“進階點杖術”時的想法，你認為你能定義/講你就是對的？“換腳時〔重心〕歸零”及“點了轉”都是有一定的時效的‧你做不到，所以是你自己的定義“混淆”；你解釋解釋不出來，做又做不到，所以說你是“練了白練”‧隨便你啦。

:)
IS

人家怎滑關妳屁事、搞好自己先。

[norman]

沒人要混淆你的定義，“姿勢歸零”在中文上有一定意義的，你只是不知道你在說什麼‧你說你在練“姿勢歸零”，不是嗎？而我是說高手滑雪是不用這“過度”/transient的技術的‧你的不學不長的辯，結果又掉回你練直排輪“進階點杖術”時的想法，你認為你能定義/講你就是對的？“換腳時〔重心〕歸零”及“點了轉”都是有一定的時效的‧你做不到，所以是你自己的定義“混淆”；你解釋解釋不出來，做又做不到，所以說你是“練了白練”‧隨便你啦。

:)
IS

過度”/transient，講的範圍太大了，不是三言兩語可講。

換腳時〔重心〕歸零”及“點了轉，你是做到基本而己，再深一點就無法做到了，這個我們已講過。因為你點的時候，你的重心從沒歸零過，不然點的姿勢就好看多了。

我講的「姿勢歸零」的定義就只有三點，肩、膝、腳，同時向前，分站姿歸零跟蹲姿歸零，再多講其他就是多餘的了，但絕不會用重心歸零這話，因為重心歸零，肩、膝、腳不一定需要同時向前。忘了提外加一點，雙腳要齊平．

再次講這麼清楚了，你還當我講得不清不楚，那你不如好好解釋一下你的重心歸零是什麼吧？

至於「點了轉」，字義都這麼清楚了，難道還要加以解釋什麼？可以的話，你也可以針對這三個字好好的寫出一篇長文說明來看看囉。

至於我做不做得到，不需費心，直排輪影片看不懂，下次有機會拍滑雪影片就行了。

[skier888]

Then I'd be really interesting to see how your L3-1/2義妹滑樹林, any video of her tree skiing? Haven't met any lady skiers that is aggressive in tree-skiing, and my friend is the best tree-skier I've ever skied with,

Flatboarding/Line-skiing: off-piste, Maggie's canyon, right traverse, Heavenly - YouTube




Actually, as an ex PSIA Clinician, he can do those PSIA maneuvers better than anybody on the mountains, including most of ski intructors.



No, only the 考官的小見識 would be being laughed at, I guess.



Guess here is where you lose your wits; you only know to look the "external forms" (like Norman does, and why I have a feeling that I am talking to a different person?), and have no idea how internally produce "forces" to perform those maneuvers.

"White Pass Turn" is a drill to practice turning and balance on the inside ski. Most of skiing turning failures are due to the misguided inside ski in the way, and prevent the skier's smooth turning, so, taking care of inside ski before you turn guarantees you a smooth and efficient turning. "White Pass Turn" enhances that ability, so it is on PSIA L2 exam item, iirc.

I don't think that examiner would laugh to death, only little knowledge does.



No, my pole-plants maybe old school; nevertheless, they are efficient and functional (for a function that is not needed in the first place), and“點了轉”is the "industry" standard, why do you think that you CSIA examiners cannot see it? In facts, given lacking consistent uses of pole plants in your demo tapes, I don't think the examiner would really care how poles are being used, if pole-plant is not the specified task; do you CSIA have special demo tape specified for "pole-plant"?



I think that you lower rank instructors really hold on to your ski schools' standards too tight and too highly; if you fail a world cup freestyle champion on mogul skiing skill test because it doesn't meet your standards, then your standards may be called into question. Johnny Mosley was given L3 by Heavenly after he won the Olympic Gold in 1998. The real world of skiing is really bigger than your CSIA's teaching. There is no law in American that prohibits an uncert ski instructor to teach skiing.

:)
IS

Skiing/Sliding is an enjoyment for most, good or not. Why do you keep on this crap about being better than anyone else. If you have fun, have fun, nobody will disagree with you.

The closet I can think of is Glen Plake but I don't think he has L3. Jonny Mosley's home mountain is Squaw. Heavenly has no authority to give out PSIA L3 to anyone.

You are teaching at Heavenly illegally. Let me know when is your next lesson so I can call Heavenly to bust you, then you can prove you are actually doing it legally. Do you have liability insurance? Do you have any idea that people can sue you and take everything you have if someone got injured while you are doing business.

[snowrider]

偶滑了一個 weekend 回來一看
又吵成一團了

[pku]

偶滑了一個 weekend 回來一看
又吵成一團了

唔鬥鬥嘴那有嘢講

[taichiskiing]

過度”/transient，講的範圍太大了，不是三言兩語可講。

是你的知識範圍太小，所以對你來說“不是三言兩語可講”‧“過度”是一個“經過”的過程；在物理上，“經過”的過程中能量上沒有變化的，所以不是“歸零”‧

換腳時〔重心〕歸零”及“點了轉，你是做到基本而己，再深一點就無法做到了，這個我們已講過。因為你點的時候，你的重心從沒歸零過，不然點的姿勢就好看多了。

剛好相反，最好的點杖是“點了轉”，你的“再深”的點法只是你無法跟上那“點了轉”的時效‧你所謂的“好看姿勢”，跟你滑雪一樣，我看都“溫”，你不需要跟我們說你沒有“美感”，我們已經知道了。

我講的「姿勢歸零」的定義就只有三點，肩、膝、腳，同時向前，分站姿歸零跟蹲姿歸零，再多講其他就是多餘的了，但絕不會用重心歸零這話，因為重心歸零，肩、膝、腳不一定需要同時向前。忘了提外加一點，雙腳要齊平．

你不曉得肩、膝、腳都有它們自己重心，而你不能配合它們它們是各走各的？你可以配合它們同時向前，但是你好忙是真的‧而你還是忘了“髖”，我們人体重心所在‧要支持我們的“重心”，你的“雙腳要齊平”也是多餘的要求。

再次講這麼清楚了，你還當我講得不清不楚，那你不如好好解釋一下你的重心歸零是什麼吧？

重心放在支點/腳上與地心吸引力垂直，所以重心不隨著地力移動是“歸零”，就跟你“走路”一樣‧你是自認會滑雪，卻把走路也忘了，你走路時“姿勢歸零”嗎？

至於「點了轉」，字義都這麼清楚了，難道還要加以解釋什麼？可以的話，你也可以針對這三個字好好的寫出一篇長文說明來看看囉。

寫過，但是你看不懂‧

http://www.taomartialarts.com/ski/ski_prin_tech.html

至於我做不做得到，不需費心，直排輪影片看不懂，下次有機會拍滑雪影片就行了。

沒人會為你做不做得到費心，我們已經知道你拍不出來我們的水準，

Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: tree skiing, Canyon Express trees, Heavenly - YouTube



:)
IS

[taichiskiing]

Skiing/Sliding is an enjoyment for most, good or not. Why do you keep on this crap about being better than anyone else. If you have fun, have fun, nobody will disagree with you.

醜婦賣俏？Apparently I have fun skiing flatboarding, but you cannot do it, so you're envy turn jealous turn sabotage, and after being exposed as such then you turn shameless, who cares about what you agree or not? I don't think that your miserable skiing is the interest of this forum. You may not want to ski better, but others will, so step down your soapbox, you have the freedom to leave.

The closet I can think of is Glen Plake but I don't think he has L3. Jonny Mosley's home mountain is Squaw. Heavenly has no authority to give out PSIA L3 to anyone.

The closet is where you hiding. Not sure whether or not Glen Plake has L3, but who cares? He skis better than most L3.

Glen Plake & Friends - YouTube



Heavenly has their own rating system.

You are teaching at Heavenly illegally. Let me know when is your next lesson so I can call Heavenly to bust you, then you can prove you are actually doing it legally. Do you have liability insurance? Do you have any idea that people can sue you and take everything you have if someone got injured while you are doing business.

想來你是一定很得意自己會打小報告的人‧自己想在網路上一逞你小知小人的口舌之能，沒有實力被貶，不自反省，還老羞成怒，告人顧主，破壞他人的生計，典型網路上小知小人的行徑，你只是個「以小人之心度君子之腹」的“鄉愿”‧你可以去告，只是看有沒有人理你這種雞毛蒜皮的事‧我不需要化那麼大精神去証明你的挑戰，你小人做事只有「損人不利己」醜陋而己。

:)
IS

[taichiskiing]

偶滑了一個 weekend 回來一看
又吵成一團了

不是，只是那些小知小人的無理取鬧。

Being busy skiing myself; we've got 3' of snow last week, good powder tree bump skiing all around. Temperature has warmed up a bit, good spring skiing.

Why I bother with skier888 and beg? Cannot and will not let them trash this forum.

:)
IS

[beg]

不是，只是那些小知小人的無理取鬧。

Being busy skiing myself; we've got 3' of snow last week, good powder tree bump skiing all around. Temperature has warmed up a bit, good spring skiing.

Why I bother with skier888 and beg? Cannot and will not let them trash this forum.

:)
IS

對，只是那些小知小人的無理取鬧。that's why all forums said they are so happy to have Taichiskiing out。

[norman]

偶滑了一個 weekend 回來一看
又吵成一團了

其實最近我覺得比較像感情交流耶。

堅持已見，不全是錯，但在交流中也許會有一些靈感或悟通的想法，誰知道呢？

搞不好越講，技術可以越來越提升也說不定囉。

[norman]

是你的知識範圍太小，所以對你來說“不是三言兩語可講”‧“過度”是一個“經過”的過程；在物理上，“經過”的過程中能量上沒有變化的，所以不是“歸零”‧

你不會我的核心技術，你當然無法加以利用，結果只陷入一般知識而已。

我都已講過了，我的自身動作能量來自於腹腰，所以我的動作叫自主控制，所以我的只需要一套即可應萬變，而你只能利用外在能量來調整自己的動作，你的動作只能是被動控制而已，所以需要無限套，當然就會套牢自己囉。

剛好相反，最好的點杖是“點了轉”，你的“再深”的點法只是你無法跟上那“點了轉”的時效‧你所謂的“好看姿勢”，跟你滑雪一樣，我看都“溫”，你不需要跟我們說你沒有“美感”，我們已經知道了。

快而姿勢醜就好看？我可不認同。

你的點了就轉本是無錯，錯只是你的雪杖會亂飛，無故耗損氣力。

你不曉得肩、膝、腳都有它們自己重心，而你不能配合它們它們是各走各的？你可以配合它們同時向前，但是你好忙是真的‧而你還是忘了“髖”，我們人体重心所在‧要支持我們的“重心”，你的“雙腳要齊平”也是多餘的要求。

嘿，你真不知我在說什麼，這點我也不必要跟你解釋，但這只是基本要求而已。如果你不能將地心引力及離心力及向心力與自身達到一個平衡點，就會失去平衡，不過我的動作是控制提高平衡然然做下一個動作，所以我可以將這三力的影響降到最低。

重心放在支點/腳上與地心吸引力垂直，所以重心不隨著地力移動是“歸零”，就跟你“走路”一樣‧你是自認會滑雪，卻把走路也忘了，你走路時“姿勢歸零”嗎？

走路跟滑雪是不一樣的，你該不會用走路下坡的方式來滑雪吧？

且走路不需要用腹腰力，只要用腿力就行了。

改天太無聊時，我嚐試用腹腰力來走各種不同的地形看看會有什麼差別。

寫過，但是你看不懂‧

http://www.taomartialarts.com/ski/ski_prin_tech.html

太囉嗦了，對技術無法讓人很快的切入，反而不知你在說什麼，況且你又不用點杖，點杖對你而言只會降速且轉彎有疙瘩而已，還不能加速最大化，不是嗎？

沒人會為你做不做得到費心，我們已經知道你拍不出來我們的水準，

Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: tree skiing, Canyon Express trees, Heavenly - YouTube


:)
IS

沒有合適的跟拍著自然無法拍，這已是我後天上的問題，你那些對我來講確實是不成問題的。

如下，他在快速下坡，還是用雪杖，不然在這麼快的下山速度，早就跌個滿頭包了。不過我不確定我在沒有使用雪杖下這樣的坡，我的速度能有多快，我就不知道了，這就得試才知道了。

Glen Plake & Friends - YouTube

[skier888]

醜婦賣俏？Apparently I have fun skiing flatboarding, but you cannot do it, so you're envy turn jealous turn sabotage, and after being exposed as such then you turn shameless, who cares about what you agree or not? I don't think that your miserable skiing is the interest of this forum. You may not want to ski better, but others will, so step down your soapbox, you have the freedom to leave.



The closet is where you hiding. Not sure whether or not Glen Plake has L3, but who cares? He skis better than most L3.

Glen Plake & Friends - YouTube


Heavenly has their own rating system.



想來你是一定很得意自己會打小報告的人‧自己想在網路上一逞你小知小人的口舌之能，沒有實力被貶，不自反省，還老羞成怒，告人顧主，破壞他人的生計，典型網路上小知小人的行徑，你只是個「以小人之心度君子之腹」的“鄉愿”‧你可以去告，只是看有沒有人理你這種雞毛蒜皮的事‧我不需要化那麼大精神去証明你的挑戰，你小人做事只有「損人不利己」醜陋而己。

:)
IS

Nobody try to sabotage you if you get your fact straight. You made so many mistakes in one sentence. After I point out your mistakes, you say you don't care. Just like similar remark about Canadian dollar. You always turn embarrassment into attack.

Even your friend Snowrider can't say your technique is better. The best he can do is saying your balance is good.

[beg]

其實最近我覺得比較像感情交流耶。

堅持已見，不全是錯，但在交流中也許會有一些靈感或悟通的想法，誰知道呢？

搞不好越講，技術可以越來越提升也說不定囉。

堅持已見，全不是錯,只是有人又要威風,又怕痕黑又怕痛、俾人踢穿真面目就以烏嘴傷人、不過你把它困在這裏也算做一件好事、免得它四處作惡。

[beg]

偶滑了一個 weekend 回來一看
又吵成一團了

Read this again and the answer is there.

Congrulation to Taichi. never change in 20 years maybe.

http://frank.mtsu.edu/~jpurcell/Taichi/ ... /2149.html


Re: The Ski Guy's Background

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Tai Chi Page Tips & Help Board ] [ FAQ ]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Gene on July 19, 1998 at 15:15:32:

In Reply to: The Ski Guy's Background posted by Historian on July 19, 1998 at 11:25:10:


: The ski guy is a man named Ichin Shen. He has never had a formal teacher in ANY martial art where he got beyond the basic lvel of a beginner.

: He writes a lot of articles and posts on the boards on Taijiquan but his words are very philosophical and 99% BS showing a complete lack of Taijiquan practice or understanding.

: His Shen Style Taijiquan is based upon the 88 posture Taijiquan created in the PRC. For those of you unfamiliar with 88 posture Taijiquan, it was created after 48 posture Taijiquan and is 95% the same as traditional Yang Chengfu's routine. the man who is credited with its creation was mainly looking for a name and was a really high level Taijiquan player as was the case with the creators of 24, 48, and 42 Taijiquan.

: Many teachers in the PRC refuse to teach 88 posture because of its obvious ripoff of traditional Yang style.

: So, Mr. Shen is a person of limited training who bases his style on probably the worst Taijiquan routine to be created since 1950. With this in mind, how good could he be? Not very. And he LOVES to get into arguments with people. I have yet to see a post where his arrogance did not end up in name calling. So, it is best to just ignore him and perhaps he will go away. He is, after all, really only interested in making a name for himself and making money through Taijiquan. In themselves, there is nothing wrong with that, but he has yet to learn well, humble himself to a teacher in exchange for training....so he has neither the knowledge, temperment, nor background to be of any concern to anyone.

[pku]

Then I'd be really interesting to see how your L3-1/2義妹滑樹林, any video of her tree skiing? Haven't met any lady skiers that is aggressive in tree-skiing, and my friend is the best tree-skier I've ever skied with,

Flatboarding/Line-skiing: off-piste, Maggie's canyon, right traverse, Heavenly - YouTube




Actually, as an ex PSIA Clinician, he can do those PSIA maneuvers better than anybody on the mountains, including most of ski intructors.



No, only the 考官的小見識 would be being laughed at, I guess.



Guess here is where you lose your wits; you only know to look the "external forms" (like Norman does, and why I have a feeling that I am talking to a different person?), and have no idea how internally produce "forces" to perform those maneuvers.

"White Pass Turn" is a drill to practice turning and balance on the inside ski. Most of skiing turning failures are due to the misguided inside ski in the way, and prevent the skier's smooth turning, so, taking care of inside ski before you turn guarantees you a smooth and efficient turning. "White Pass Turn" enhances that ability, so it is on PSIA L2 exam item, iirc.

I don't think that examiner would laugh to death, only little knowledge does.



No, my pole-plants maybe old school; nevertheless, they are efficient and functional (for a function that is not needed in the first place), and“點了轉”is the "industry" standard, why do you think that you CSIA examiners cannot see it? In facts, given lacking consistent uses of pole plants in your demo tapes, I don't think the examiner would really care how poles are being used, if pole-plant is not the specified task; do you CSIA have special demo tape specified for "pole-plant"?



I think that you lower rank instructors really hold on to your ski schools' standards too tight and too highly; if you fail a world cup freestyle champion on mogul skiing skill test because it doesn't meet your standards, then your standards may be called into question. Johnny Mosley was given L3 by Heavenly after he won the Olympic Gold in 1998. The real world of skiing is really bigger than your CSIA's teaching. There is no law in American that prohibits an uncert ski instructor to teach skiing.

:)
IS

,
Csia 怎樣點杖，請Norman post 便可 ，至於csia的bump skiing 是用其基本技術 steering ( combination of edging and pivoting ）発上去。 freestyle 跟本不是這樣滑。freestyle 有自己的基本技術，不會用你家的名去教自己的東西，csia 是走圓，freestyle 是走直，理念不同，我有個前加拿大少年國家隊的同事，前兩年前考到L4 我跟他上PDP 他不會教freestyle 的東西，他也是whistler 的freestyle coach 他教freestyle的時候也不會教csia的東西。雖然你的太極滑雪已逹化境，但還不可隨滑人家方法

[pku]

你不會我的核心技術，你當然無法加以利用，結果只陷入一般知識而已。

我都已講過了，我的自身動作能量來自於腹腰，所以我的動作叫自主控制，所以我的只需要一套即可應萬變，而你只能利用外在能量來調整自己的動作，你的動作只能是被動控制而已，所以需要無限套，當然就會套牢自己囉。



快而姿勢醜就好看？我可不認同。

你的點了就轉本是無錯，錯只是你的雪杖會亂飛，無故耗損氣力。



嘿，你真不知我在說什麼，這點我也不必要跟你解釋，但這只是基本要求而已。如果你不能將地心引力及離心力及向心力與自身達到一個平衡點，就會失去平衡，不過我的動作是控制提高平衡然然做下一個動作，所以我可以將這三力的影響降到最低。



走路跟滑雪是不一樣的，你該不會用走路下坡的方式來滑雪吧？

且走路不需要用腹腰力，只要用腿力就行了。

改天太無聊時，我嚐試用腹腰力來走各種不同的地形看看會有什麼差別。



太囉嗦了，對技術無法讓人很快的切入，反而不知你在說什麼，況且你又不用點杖，點杖對你而言只會降速且轉彎有疙瘩而已，還不能加速最大化，不是嗎？



沒有合適的跟拍著自然無法拍，這已是我後天上的問題，你那些對我來講確實是不成問題的。

如下，他在快速下坡，還是用雪杖，不然在這麼快的下山速度，早就跌個滿頭包了。不過我不確定我在沒有使用雪杖下這樣的坡，我的速度能有多快，我就不知道了，這就得試才知道了。

Glen Plake & Friends - YouTube

嘩，你已前不是這樣講，你說太極大師點枝時間準確，現在竟說他雪杖亂飛，，，跟beg 講一樣。

[norman]

,
Csia 怎樣點杖，請Norman post 便可 ，至於csia的bump skiing 是用其基本技術 steering ( combination of edging and pivoting ）発上去。 freestyle 跟本不是這樣滑。freestyle 有自己的基本技術，不會用你家的名去教自己的東西，csia 是走圓，freestyle 是走直，理念不同，我有個前加拿大少年國家隊的同事，前兩年前考到L4 我跟他上PDP 他不會教freestyle 的東西，他也是whistler 的freestyle coach 他教freestyle的時候也不會教csia的東西。雖然你的太極滑雪已逹化境，但還不可隨滑人家方法

你指的是下面這兩種區別，點杖的方式不一樣，連下饅頭的方式也是不一樣的。

Je domine_Newberry - YouTube


Speed Control in the Moguls - YouTube