from: http://www.epicski.com/forum/thread/939 ... st_1216242
Expert //
Roland Medium Dynamic Parallel on Vimeo
Bump
Roland Bump SKiing on Vimeo
這麼高手還要請教他人. :)
版主: norman
#2 回覆: 這麼高手還要請教他人. :)
From his vedio clips, I thought that he was just like a level-2 instructor (I meant PSIA).carver_hk 寫:from: http://www.epicski.com/forum/thread/939 ... st_1216242
Expert //
Roland Medium Dynamic Parallel on Vimeo
Bump
Roland Bump SKiing on Vimeo
Going to sleep now.
#3 回覆: 這麼高手還要請教他人. :)
This guy got some really impressive credentials: 'I am a current CSIA level 3, CSIA Level 1 Evaluator and CSCF Entry level coach...'. From his video, the only thing I don't like about his skiing is his speed. I wonder if he speed up he might look differently?snowrider 寫:From his vedio clips, I thought that he was just like a level-2 instructor (I meant PSIA).
最後由 carver_hk 於 週一 4月 12, 2010 2:11 pm 編輯，總共編輯了 1 次。
I love line graphic 
#5 回覆: 這麼高手還要請教他人. :)
Maybe those two vedio clips were his old ones - from when he was a lower level instrucor. I can say that it's definitely not in PSIA's level-3 level because a L-3 requires the instructor to ski some difficult bumps in a very quick and smooth way - and always facing mountain base.carver_hk 寫:This guy got some really impressive credentials: 'I am a current CSIA level 3, CSIA Level 1 Evaluator and CSCF Entry level coach...'. From his video, the only thing I don't like about his skiing is his speed. I wonder if he speed up he might look differently?
#6 回覆: 這麼高手還要請教他人. :)
This is probably the only vid I havn't paid attention. Its good that you pick out his weakness.snowrider 寫:L-3 requires the instructor to ski some difficult bumps in a very quick and smooth way - and always facing mountain base.
I love line graphic
#7 回覆: 這麼高手還要請教他人. :)
這會不會跟雪況有關？好像當地的雪況比較濕一點、重一點！carver_hk 寫: From his video, the only thing I don't like about his skiing is his speed. I wonder if he speed up he might look differently?
他 edge 的角度頂高的，讓我想起在八方尾根跟那堆爛雪奮鬥的日子 ....
#8 回覆: 這麼高手還要請教他人. :)
It is clearly said in the subject that it is CISA. Why do you guys keep on talking about PSIA
#9 回覆: 這麼高手還要請教他人. :)
其實我只細看了他的 EXPERT //, 沒怎麼留意他的 MOGUL, 在他的 expert // 中, 他板還是在雪面, 所以古計這雪況應該不會太難滑, 只是他實在是太慢了, 可能是在示範 csia 的要求動作?lelo 寫:這會不會跟雪況有關？好像當地的雪況比較濕一點、重一點！
他 edge 的角度頂高的，讓我想起在八方尾根跟那堆爛雪奮鬥的日子 ....
I love line graphic
#10 回覆: 這麼高手還要請教他人. :)
我是說他的雪板側立在雪面的角度很大, 在 expert 那段應該也是 ...
#11 回覆: 這麼高手還要請教他人. :)
是啊, 而且有點大師所說的 early edge 感覺, 所以我覺得他滑得很好呀.lelo 寫:我是說他的雪板側立在雪面的角度很大, 在 expert 那段應該也是 ...
I love line graphic
#12 回覆: 這麼高手還要請教他人. :)
I love line graphic
#13 回覆: 這麼高手還要請教他人. :)
38 sec 那段板尾有側滑, expert 那段則小心翼翼的沒半點側滑, 我認為還是跟雪況有關 ...
#14 回覆: 這麼高手還要請教他人. :)
什麼是側滑:face (46):lelo 寫:38 sec 那段板尾有側滑, expert 那段則小心翼翼的沒半點側滑, 我認為還是跟雪況有關 ...
I love line graphic
#16 回覆: 這麼高手還要請教他人. :)
他們的學派不是走刃的, 沒這要求吧? 要沒有推雪, 先要做到這個 basic carving 收彎也是屈板. 不然沒有 steering 或 skidding 便會滑出很大的短彎. :)lelo 寫:板尾推雪, 或是 skidding ...
您沒有權限檢視這篇文章所附加的檔案。
最後由 carver_hk 於 週二 4月 13, 2010 11:10 am 編輯，總共編輯了 2 次。
I love line graphic
#17 回覆: 這麼高手還要請教他人. :)
我認為他這樣滑是為適應雪況, 跟學派無關 ...
另外要沒有 skidding, 只要 edge 的角度夠, 並不須屈板 ...
另外要沒有 skidding, 只要 edge 的角度夠, 並不須屈板 ...
#18 回覆: 這麼高手還要請教他人. :)
以你工學的見解, 你認為在沒有屈板情況下, 一對 sidecut 半徑為 13米的板, 在立角60度但又沒有屈板的行走路線應該是半徑多少?lelo 寫:我認為他這樣滑是為適應雪況, 跟學派無關 ...
另外要沒有 skidding, 只要 edge 的角度夠, 並不須屈板 ...
I love line graphic
#19 回覆: 這麼高手還要請教他人. :)
喔! sorrry! 單就個人經驗發言, 沒有多想 ...
應該還是有屈板, 只是 edge 角度越大, 屈板效果越顯著, 所需力氣也越小 ....
應該還是有屈板, 只是 edge 角度越大, 屈板效果越顯著, 所需力氣也越小 ....
#20 回覆: 這麼高手還要請教他人. :)
相信你說的是自然屈板, 這是不用屈板技術的, 只要雪夠軟, 板便會自然屈, 但這幅度可能不足夠轉小彎. 中彎還是有可能, 就以幾何的方法可以推測, 要滑小彎又要沒有 skidding 和 steering 應該要人為屈板, 把立角的板全屈, 把半徑屈出來, 再跟著板邊走便是, 也是不用力的. 體重和離心力已足夠屈板. 這點可以用反證方法求證, 只要你試一從所有 skidding 和 steering 在硬雪面的小彎短片中, 找一下屈板收彎的定鏡, 便知很難找到的. :)lelo 寫:喔! sorrry! 單就個人經驗發言, 沒有多想 ...
應該還是有屈板, 只是 edge 角度越大, 屈板效果越顯著
I love line graphic