吹牛、無恥、看了都累、小知識...等

[taichiskiing]

檢舉理由：只用於反映爭吵，濫發廣告，和有問題(色情，容易引起爭斗，或者粗俗)的文章。(版規其一)

YouTube - Short Turn Big White 2011-1

Way more than 50.

For such flat terrain? 看的都累‧

YouTube - Taichiskiing/Flatboarding: cross-through garland turns

See how you ski the steep and ski the flat. Totally different. Big tranvers on the steep and much smoother turns on the flat.

Not really, Taichi Skiing is「以一貫之」/one way fits all, the difference you see is only the different reflections of gravity and its environment. "Big traverse" is only your little knowledge doesn't know better, and you have "longer traverse" than mine, reason below.

I still don't need to make big tranverse on the steep, just take a bit more time to turn and I can still make good turns on the steep when snow condition is good.

YouTube - Down Black Bunps Run 2010



Ahh..., the 51 sec glory, and you think that slope is "steep"? and you can only ski it "when snow condition is good"? and you say something about I can only ski in soft snow as bad thing? You don't really know what you're talking about, do you? Actually, "just take a bit more time to turn" does mean "long traverse" in bump skiing.

YouTube - Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: shadow skiing Little Dipper, Heavenly.



:)
IS

[taichiskiing]

YouTube - Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: mogul


YouTube - down Goat's Gully 2010

See how much you need to tranverse at the beginning. tranversing is not straight + you don't know how to use poles to ski

You can only ski more striaght when the slope becomes gentle + snow is soft.

So you don't see how I turn downhill straight down? You have a more symmetric turn shapes and line-skiing has irregular turn shapes, so more often than not, you have a longer traverse than mine. Poles are not needed in alpine skiing, so no poles skiing is cleaner, and simpler, so is better. And you don't know whether or not I know how to use poles, so, yes, that's only your little knowledge's malicious speculation.

And even the snow is soft and slope is gentle you can't ski gracefully or fast,

YouTube - Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: free skiing



but you think that you ski better? "Are you not boasting, shameless"?

:)
IS

[B2L2]

教育我？

你會不會弄錯人了，在這篇討論串，及一開始講wedge的不是我吧？

要不要先弄清楚一下日期？

讓你自己去看一看會不會發現，先弄清楚，別亂講話，要我學beg來個污嘴回污嘴嗎？不，他即使是他人沒污嘴也要污嘴的無恥小人作法，我是否也要來用幾下？所以我才說你們這些team的作風什麼都是一個鳥樣子呢？

Is 日期 important? Is who start first matter? When you have spend some much time editing other people's video to show their wedge in that split of a second, that showed who you are and who is also practicing 污嘴回污嘴.

(BTW, thanks for spending all your time to do the video editing. I did save a copy and I like that. Thanks Norman. :) )

[beg]

Is 日期 important? Is how start first matter? When you have spend some much time editing other people's video to show their wedge in that split of a second, that showed who you are and who is also practicing 污嘴回污嘴.

(BTW, thanks for spending all your time to do the video editing. I did save a copy and I like that. Thanks Norman. :) )

Thanks 若至crazy norman 烏咀管理員

[CrazyBoy]

Is 日期 important? Is who start first matter?

誰？引證一下。

沒證據別亂污賴人。

[pku]

YouTube - Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: mogul

YouTube - down Goat's Gully 2010



So you don't see how I turn downhill straight down? You have a more symmetric turn shapes and line-skiing has irregular turn shapes, so more often than not, you have a longer traverse than mine. Poles are not needed in alpine skiing, so no poles skiing is cleaner, and simpler, so is better. And you don't know whether or not I know how to use poles, so, yes, that's only your little knowledge's malicious speculation.

And even the snow is soft and slope is gentle you can't ski gracefully or fast,

YouTube - Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: free skiing


but you think that you ski better? "Are you not boasting, shameless"?

:)
IS

There is nothing wrong with Taichiskiing. We cannot blame someone who enjoys or feels good about him/herself. If you tell a frog that he is ugly, he won't agree. He would tell you that a she-frog told him that he was very handsome. It's just about different standards.

I have shown some 半制動 pictures. It is related to TCS this time. Other times have to do with norman. I am not nitpicking the their skiing. This is the way they turn on somewhat difficult terrain, all the turns are done this way. They also like to put down others and claim they are better than others. The problem is that their videos do not back up their claims but they continue to tell others how great they are and how little we know.

[taichiskiing]

There is nothing wrong with Taichiskiing. We cannot blame someone who enjoys or feels good about him/herself. If you tell a frog that he is ugly, he won't agree. He would tell you that a she-frog told him that he was very handsome. It's just about different standards.

Actually, I now don't know who is saying what, given you gappers' 抄襲篡改, so, I'll just respond to the poster.

Yup, you sounded like a frog talk about itself.

I have shown some 半制動 pictures. It is related to TCS this time. Other times have to do with norman. I am not nitpicking the their skiing. This is the way they turn on somewhat difficult terrain, all the turns are done this way. They also like to put down others and claim they are better than others. The problem is that their videos do not back up their claims but they continue to tell others how great they are and how little we know.

Nevertheless, given you cannot do powder, cannot do trees, cannot do double diamond, but you think you know better about skiing and ski better because you are a CSIA L1!!!???
Typical L1.

Yup, that's how little you know. "Are you not boasting, ..."?

:)
IS

[pku]

Actually, I now don't know who is saying what, given you gappers' 抄襲篡改, so, I'll just respond to the poster.

Yup, you sounded like a frog talk about itself.



Nevertheless, given you cannot do powder, cannot do trees, cannot do double diamond, but you think you know better about skiing and ski better because you are a CSIA L1!!!???
Typical L1.

Yup, that's how little you know. "Are you not boasting, ..."?

:)
IS

小人的本性，尖、酸、刻、簿，只會找別人的短處看而不見大體，不能學，不能改善/進步，所以德性不好不說，還知識淺簿‧“典型的小知，自己不會，還說別人會的滑的不好‧”

CSIA L1, Who is he?

[taichiskiing]

小人的本性，尖、酸、刻、簿，只會找別人的短處看而不見大體，不能學，不能改善/進步，所以德性不好不說，還知識淺簿‧“典型的小知，自己不會，還說別人會的滑的不好‧”

CSIA L1, Who is he?

賴到連自己是誰都不知道呢？還是原來就是假的L1？對，小知小人。

:)
IS

[pku]

賴到連自己是誰都不知道呢？還是原來就是假的L1？對，小知小人。

:)
IS

I said I am L1 and Beg is L2 but I didn't say which System. If you don't know what system I am talking about, then just put down what I write.

Be Smart!

If you put down the $2000.00 to Snowrider as deposite of our on hill PK event, I'll show you the officail card of my certification and you'll know what level of certification I am holding.

" 小知 " should be the best word to describe youself

[pku]

Actually, I now don't know who is saying what, given you gappers' 抄襲篡改, so, I'll just respond to the poster.

Yup, you sounded like a frog talk about itself.



Nevertheless, given you cannot do powder, cannot do trees, cannot do double diamond, but you think you know better about skiing and ski better because you are a CSIA L1!!!???
Typical L1.

Yup, that's how little you know. "Are you not boasting, ..."?

:)
IS

Are Standard is totally different, you use your skiing as standard of high end skiing. So you always ski excellent, and score full mark.

I use his standard as highend skiing, If something I can do 60% of what he is doing, I considered OK, lees than that is not pass. For sure I fail the powder part. According to what he skied on the powder, you totally suck on powder but you are living in your own world.

YouTube - Silver Star's Norman Kreutz's Ski Tip


I think I can ski 70% like him on those bumps and the groom so my skiing on those things are OK.

Once one set the goal so low like you, one will stay that level forever.

[taichiskiing]

I said I am L1 and Beg is L2 but I didn't say which System. If you don't know what system I am talking about, then just put down what I write.

Be Smart!

If you put down the $2000.00 to Snowrider as deposite of our on hill PK event, I'll show you the officail card of my certification and you'll know what level of certification I am holding.

No, I don't care what system and what rank you have; if you dare not proudly display your credential, your credential ain't worth the paper it printed on, and you are the disgrace of your certificate.

" 小知 " should be the best word to describe youself

"given you cannot do powder, cannot do trees, cannot do double diamond"? you are talking about yourself, little knowledge.

:)
IS

[taichiskiing]

Are Standard is totally different, you use your skiing as standard of high end skiing. So you always ski excellent, and score full mark.

Yup, that's how usually a little knowledge argue, twisted. No, my standard is based on the Newton's mechanism and laws of motions, which explain the fundamental behaviors of "alpine skiing," as well as all your Xsia theories are based on, so yes, my standard covers your standard, so it is your standard low.

I use his standard as highend skiing, If something I can do 60% of what he is doing, I considered OK, lees than that is not pass. For sure I fail the powder part. According to what he skied on the powder, you totally suck on powder but you are living in your own world.

YouTube - Silver Star's Norman Kreutz's Ski Tip



Not bad skiing, nevertheless, turn-skiing, and too much 拙力, I prefer "smooth sailing,"

YouTube - Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: powder gully skiing



The question remains for you is, can you make five turns in powder/6"+ of fresh snow without crach? Oops, you've already said that you failed the powder, are you NOT“典型的小知，自己不會，還說別人會的滑的不好‧”？

I think I can ski 70% like him on those bumps and the groom so my skiing on those things are OK.

Once one set the goal so low like you, one will stay that level forever.

No powder skiing, so there's no tree skiing neither, but you think your goal is higher? "Double standard, or shameless denial"?

:)
IS

[pku]

Yup, that's how usually a little knowledge argue, twisted. No, my standard is based on the Newton's mechanism and laws of motions, which explain the fundamental behaviors of "alpine skiing," as well as all your Xsia theories are based on, so yes, my standard covers your standard, so it is your standard low.



YouTube - Silver Star's Norman Kreutz's Ski Tip


Not bad skiing, nevertheless, turn-skiing, and too much 拙力, I prefer "smooth sailing,"

YouTube - Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: powder gully skiing


The question remains for you is, can you make five turns in powder/6"+ of fresh snow without crach? Oops, you've already said that you failed the powder, are you NOT“典型的小知，自己不會，還說別人會的滑的不好‧”？



No powder skiing, so there's no tree skiing neither, but you think your goal is higher? "Double standard, or shameless denial"?

:)
IS

Tranversing a slope to decelerate.

Alpine skiing is to make efficient turns, less loss in energy and the product is fast. They are competing who is faster.

Your skiing is doing skiding turns and tranvsering on steeps to kill speed to achieve safety skiing, inefficient turns, totally opposite to Alpine Skiing' target.

Both are base on physics.

High end instructor skiing is try to be more control on the speed and still try to get the performance ( less energy loss ), They are also skiing according to physics.

別人滑的好, 說人拙力多, 典型的小人

[CrazyBoy]

Are Standard is totally different, you use your skiing as standard of high end skiing. So you always ski excellent, and score full mark.

I use his standard as highend skiing, If something I can do 60% of what he is doing, I considered OK, lees than that is not pass. For sure I fail the powder part. According to what he skied on the powder, you totally suck on powder but you are living in your own world.

YouTube - Silver Star's Norman Kreutz's Ski Tip

I think I can ski 70% like him on those bumps and the groom so my skiing on those things are OK.

Once one set the goal so low like you, one will stay that level forever.

你太高看你自己了，我認為相似度不到50%，他使用的技巧跟你的不一樣。
除非你能把你的Short Radius滑成像下面這位一樣的動作或更好，你才有可能超過50%。

YouTube - Dan Short Radius 9.MPG

[pku]

你太高看你自己了，我認為相似度不到50%，他使用的技巧跟你的不一樣。
除非你能把你的Short Radius滑成像下面這位一樣的動作或更好，你才有可能超過50%。

YouTube - Dan Short Radius 9.MPG

Then you should ask Norman Kreutz, he is charging less than $600.00 a day. He's the snow school director of Silverstar mountain. We are all using similar technique, combining the 5 skills together, Just he is blending them much better than me. I try to took an afternoon private lesson from him but he refused ( that time was only $120.00 for afternoon.). But we took some photo together.

If you go there end of March, you can stay and ski free. He was considered the top skier in CSIA 10 years ago.

LEVEL 4/SKI ACADEMY PRIVATES

From Silverstar Mountain Info:

Check out our other private coaching sessions through our Ski Academy/Level 4 Instructors, the highest certified in Canada. Choose from Full Day - $518, Half Day Morning (3hrs) - $336, Half Day Afternoon (2.5hrs) - $284, 8:30am One Hour First Tracks - $115 or One Hour - $155.

How much a ski lesson charge is decided by the mountain so if you are not smart, you may get an instuctor ski worse than Normanding

That's why $120.00 to have Norman Kreutz teaching for 3 hours is a steal But he's smart too so he increased the lesson price to around $300.00 an afternoon.

Also I bet the guy won't pass his Level 3 in this season for US$100.00, do you want to bet? We may ask him in the comment in youtube.

[CrazyBoy]

Then you should ask Norman Kreutz, he is charging less than $600.00 a day. He's the snow school director of Silverstar mountain. We are all using similar technique, combining the 5 skills together, Just he is blending them much better than me. I try to took an afternoon private lesson from him but he refused ( that time was only $120.00 for afternoon.). But we took some photo together.

In CSIA, the basic 5 skills are:

stance & balance,
pivoting,
edging,
pressure control,
timing & co-ordination

依你們的五大要素，你確實有達到70%以上，不過差了其中一點，就差了不止50%以上了。

你們的timing & co-ordination不一樣，你應該花這個錢跟Norman Kreutz學習這個一樣，對你的技術提升會很有幫助的，這是值得的。你只差一些，但這一些的差距使你離更高的距離差很大，所以上一天的課對你來講是不夠的，除非你能先做到下面這段影片中的co-ordination，你才有資格談跟Norman Kreutz達50%以上的相似度。

YouTube - Dan Short Radius 7.MPG

[pku]

依你們的五大要素，你確實有達到70%以上，不過差了其中一點，就差了不止50%以上了。

你們的timing & co-ordination不一樣，你應該花這個錢跟Norman Kreutz學習這個一樣，對你的技術提升會很有幫助的，這是值得的。你只差一些，但這一些的差距使你離更高的距離差很大，所以上一天的課對你來講是不夠的，除非你能先做到下面這段影片中的co-ordination，你才有資格談跟Norman Kreutz達50%以上的相似度。

YouTube - Dan Short Radius 7.MPG

How about we do it together. I can't afford to pay $500 for a day and you can also get his professional opinion. Danny is making smooth round turns, that's true.

[taichiskiing]

Tranversing a slope to decelerate.

Not really, "carving" is "traversing" the slope on the edges, and "deceleration" without "braking" [in skiing] is a higher level skill.

Alpine skiing is to make efficient turns, less loss in energy and the product is fast. They are competing who is faster.

Not really, alpine skiing is to utilize the power of the gravity for the pleasures of sliding downhill. Different people may enjoy many different things, and not every skier wants to be a racer or ski fast, so "competing who is faster" is only a narrow scope/mentality of skiing; easy to brag, so ski fast/carving and steep become the "Holy Grail" of little knowledge. So, you have a narrow view of skiing. The "whole skiing" is more than just turning; nevertheless, you're partially right, speed is from efficient skiing, not just efficient turns, and efficient skiing has no extra movements,

YouTube - Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: free skiing

Your skiing is doing skiding turns and tranvsering on steeps to kill speed to achieve safety skiing, inefficient turns, totally opposite to Alpine Skiing' target.

Well, you may know how to say it, but you don't know what you're talking about, as you are talking about yourself; check out the "spreads" your skidding turn generated,

YouTube - down Goat's Gully 2010



and compare my,

YouTube - Taichi Skiing/Flatboarding: mogul



No, I don't think that you "know" what a "slipping-turn" is.

Both are base on physics.

High end instructor skiing is try to be more control on the speed and still try to get the performance ( less energy loss ), They are also skiing according to physics.

Not really, care to show where in your CSIA training manuals they actually talking about physics of "slipping turn."

別人滑的好, 說人拙力多, 典型的小人

跟我的話學是不能罵人的（內容不附合），只有曝露你自己小知小人的心理‧

Turn-skiing, in its "highest" form, if it is not carving, then it is "skidded parallel turn," and "skidded parallel turn" uses "skidding" to brake/control the speed for "each" turn. 對，拙力太多‧小人是因為你自己的小知。

:)
IS

[pku]

依你們的五大要素，你確實有達到70%以上，不過差了其中一點，就差了不止50%以上了。

你們的timing & co-ordination不一樣，你應該花這個錢跟Norman Kreutz學習這個一樣，對你的技術提升會很有幫助的，這是值得的。你只差一些，但這一些的差距使你離更高的距離差很大，所以上一天的課對你來講是不夠的，除非你能先做到下面這段影片中的co-ordination，你才有資格談跟Norman Kreutz達50%以上的相似度。

YouTube - Dan Short Radius 7.MPG

It's a small world, I come accross with Dan today in the PDP sesssion. He is an instuctor working on Cypress and he was wearing the blue ski jacket. After I heard his name call Dan and saying he's working on Cypress, I ask him if he's the guy sending the video to eopic ski and he said yes.

His timing and cordination is not as good as you said according to our CSIA L4 Examiner's comment.