See how you ski the steep and ski the flat. Totally different. Big tranvers on the steep and much smoother turns on the flat.
Not really, Taichi Skiing is「以一貫之」/one way fits all, the difference you see is only the different reflections of gravity and its environment. "Big traverse" is only your little knowledge doesn't know better, and you have "longer traverse" than mine, reason below.
I still don't need to make big tranverse on the steep, just take a bit more time to turn and I can still make good turns on the steep when snow condition is good.
Ahh..., the 51 sec glory, and you think that slope is "steep"? and you can only ski it "when snow condition is good"? and you say something about I can only ski in soft snow as bad thing? You don't really know what you're talking about, do you? Actually, "just take a bit more time to turn" does mean "long traverse" in bump skiing.
pku 寫:
See how much you need to tranverse at the beginning. tranversing is not straight + you don't know how to use poles to ski
You can only ski more striaght when the slope becomes gentle + snow is soft.
So you don't see how I turn downhill straight down? You have a more symmetric turn shapes and line-skiing has irregular turn shapes, so more often than not, you have a longer traverse than mine. Poles are not needed in alpine skiing, so no poles skiing is cleaner, and simpler, so is better. And you don't know whether or not I know how to use poles, so, yes, that's only your little knowledge's malicious speculation.
And even the snow is soft and slope is gentle you can't ski gracefully or fast,
Is 日期 important? Is who start first matter? When you have spend some much time editing other people's video to show their wedge in that split of a second, that showed who you are and who is also practicing 污嘴回污嘴.
(BTW, thanks for spending all your time to do the video editing. I did save a copy and I like that. Thanks Norman. :) )
#4 回覆: PK Event (Taichiskiing vs PKU)
發表於 : 週五 3月 18, 2011 2:45 am
由 beg
B2L2 寫:Is 日期 important? Is how start first matter? When you have spend some much time editing other people's video to show their wedge in that split of a second, that showed who you are and who is also practicing 污嘴回污嘴.
(BTW, thanks for spending all your time to do the video editing. I did save a copy and I like that. Thanks Norman. :) )
Thanks 若至crazy norman 烏咀管理員
#5 回覆: PK Event (Taichiskiing vs PKU)
發表於 : 週五 3月 18, 2011 10:37 am
由 CrazyBoy
B2L2 寫:Is 日期 important? Is who start first matter?
So you don't see how I turn downhill straight down? You have a more symmetric turn shapes and line-skiing has irregular turn shapes, so more often than not, you have a longer traverse than mine. Poles are not needed in alpine skiing, so no poles skiing is cleaner, and simpler, so is better. And you don't know whether or not I know how to use poles, so, yes, that's only your little knowledge's malicious speculation.
And even the snow is soft and slope is gentle you can't ski gracefully or fast,
but you think that you ski better? "Are you not boasting, shameless"?
:)
IS
There is nothing wrong with Taichiskiing. We cannot blame someone who enjoys or feels good about him/herself. If you tell a frog that he is ugly, he won't agree. He would tell you that a she-frog told him that he was very handsome. It's just about different standards.
I have shown some 半制動 pictures. It is related to TCS this time. Other times have to do with norman. I am not nitpicking the their skiing. This is the way they turn on somewhat difficult terrain, all the turns are done this way. They also like to put down others and claim they are better than others. The problem is that their videos do not back up their claims but they continue to tell others how great they are and how little we know.
#7 回覆: PK Event (Taichiskiing vs PKU)
發表於 : 週五 3月 18, 2011 10:58 pm
由 taichiskiing
pku 寫:There is nothing wrong with Taichiskiing. We cannot blame someone who enjoys or feels good about him/herself. If you tell a frog that he is ugly, he won't agree. He would tell you that a she-frog told him that he was very handsome. It's just about different standards.
Actually, I now don't know who is saying what, given you gappers' 抄襲篡改, so, I'll just respond to the poster.
Yup, you sounded like a frog talk about itself.
I have shown some 半制動 pictures. It is related to TCS this time. Other times have to do with norman. I am not nitpicking the their skiing. This is the way they turn on somewhat difficult terrain, all the turns are done this way. They also like to put down others and claim they are better than others. The problem is that their videos do not back up their claims but they continue to tell others how great they are and how little we know.
Nevertheless, given you cannot do powder, cannot do trees, cannot do double diamond, but you think you know better about skiing and ski better because you are a CSIA L1!!!???
Typical L1.
Yup, that's how little you know. "Are you not boasting, ..."?
:)
IS
#8 回覆: PK Event (Taichiskiing vs PKU)
發表於 : 週五 3月 18, 2011 11:04 pm
由 pku
taichiskiing 寫:Actually, I now don't know who is saying what, given you gappers' 抄襲篡改, so, I'll just respond to the poster.
Yup, you sounded like a frog talk about itself.
Nevertheless, given you cannot do powder, cannot do trees, cannot do double diamond, but you think you know better about skiing and ski better because you are a CSIA L1!!!???
Typical L1.
Yup, that's how little you know. "Are you not boasting, ..."?
I said I am L1 and Beg is L2 but I didn't say which System. If you don't know what system I am talking about, then just put down what I write.
Be Smart!
If you put down the $2000.00 to Snowrider as deposite of our on hill PK event, I'll show you the officail card of my certification and you'll know what level of certification I am holding.
" 小知 " should be the best word to describe youself
#11 回覆: PK Event (Taichiskiing vs PKU)
發表於 : 週六 3月 19, 2011 2:38 am
由 pku
taichiskiing 寫:Actually, I now don't know who is saying what, given you gappers' 抄襲篡改, so, I'll just respond to the poster.
Yup, you sounded like a frog talk about itself.
Nevertheless, given you cannot do powder, cannot do trees, cannot do double diamond, but you think you know better about skiing and ski better because you are a CSIA L1!!!???
Typical L1.
Yup, that's how little you know. "Are you not boasting, ..."?
:)
IS
Are Standard is totally different, you use your skiing as standard of high end skiing. So you always ski excellent, and score full mark.
I use his standard as highend skiing, If something I can do 60% of what he is doing, I considered OK, lees than that is not pass. For sure I fail the powder part. According to what he skied on the powder, you totally suck on powder but you are living in your own world.
I think I can ski 70% like him on those bumps and the groom so my skiing on those things are OK.
Once one set the goal so low like you, one will stay that level forever.
#12 回覆: PK Event (Taichiskiing vs PKU)
發表於 : 週六 3月 19, 2011 6:22 am
由 taichiskiing
pku 寫:I said I am L1 and Beg is L2 but I didn't say which System. If you don't know what system I am talking about, then just put down what I write.
Be Smart!
If you put down the $2000.00 to Snowrider as deposite of our on hill PK event, I'll show you the officail card of my certification and you'll know what level of certification I am holding.
No, I don't care what system and what rank you have; if you dare not proudly display your credential, your credential ain't worth the paper it printed on, and you are the disgrace of your certificate.
" 小知 " should be the best word to describe youself
"given you cannot do powder, cannot do trees, cannot do double diamond"? you are talking about yourself, little knowledge.
:)
IS
#13 回覆: PK Event (Taichiskiing vs PKU)
發表於 : 週六 3月 19, 2011 6:31 am
由 taichiskiing
pku 寫:Are Standard is totally different, you use your skiing as standard of high end skiing. So you always ski excellent, and score full mark.
Yup, that's how usually a little knowledge argue, twisted. No, my standard is based on the Newton's mechanism and laws of motions, which explain the fundamental behaviors of "alpine skiing," as well as all your Xsia theories are based on, so yes, my standard covers your standard, so it is your standard low.
I use his standard as highend skiing, If something I can do 60% of what he is doing, I considered OK, lees than that is not pass. For sure I fail the powder part. According to what he skied on the powder, you totally suck on powder but you are living in your own world.
The question remains for you is, can you make five turns in powder/6"+ of fresh snow without crach? Oops, you've already said that you failed the powder, are you NOT“典型的小知，自己不會，還說別人會的滑的不好‧”？
I think I can ski 70% like him on those bumps and the groom so my skiing on those things are OK.
Once one set the goal so low like you, one will stay that level forever.
No powder skiing, so there's no tree skiing neither, but you think your goal is higher? "Double standard, or shameless denial"?
:)
IS
#14 回覆: PK Event (Taichiskiing vs PKU)
發表於 : 週六 3月 19, 2011 7:59 am
由 pku
taichiskiing 寫:Yup, that's how usually a little knowledge argue, twisted. No, my standard is based on the Newton's mechanism and laws of motions, which explain the fundamental behaviors of "alpine skiing," as well as all your Xsia theories are based on, so yes, my standard covers your standard, so it is your standard low.
The question remains for you is, can you make five turns in powder/6"+ of fresh snow without crach? Oops, you've already said that you failed the powder, are you NOT“典型的小知，自己不會，還說別人會的滑的不好‧”？
No powder skiing, so there's no tree skiing neither, but you think your goal is higher? "Double standard, or shameless denial"?
:)
IS
Tranversing a slope to decelerate.
Alpine skiing is to make efficient turns, less loss in energy and the product is fast. They are competing who is faster.
Your skiing is doing skiding turns and tranvsering on steeps to kill speed to achieve safety skiing, inefficient turns, totally opposite to Alpine Skiing' target.
Both are base on physics.
High end instructor skiing is try to be more control on the speed and still try to get the performance ( less energy loss ), They are also skiing according to physics.
別人滑的好, 說人拙力多, 典型的小人
#15 回覆: PK Event (Taichiskiing vs PKU)
發表於 : 週六 3月 19, 2011 11:06 am
由 CrazyBoy
pku 寫:Are Standard is totally different, you use your skiing as standard of high end skiing. So you always ski excellent, and score full mark.
I use his standard as highend skiing, If something I can do 60% of what he is doing, I considered OK, lees than that is not pass. For sure I fail the powder part. According to what he skied on the powder, you totally suck on powder but you are living in your own world.
Then you should ask Norman Kreutz, he is charging less than $600.00 a day. He's the snow school director of Silverstar mountain. We are all using similar technique, combining the 5 skills together, Just he is blending them much better than me. I try to took an afternoon private lesson from him but he refused ( that time was only $120.00 for afternoon.). But we took some photo together.
If you go there end of March, you can stay and ski free. He was considered the top skier in CSIA 10 years ago.
LEVEL 4/SKI ACADEMY PRIVATES
From Silverstar Mountain Info:
Check out our other private coaching sessions through our Ski Academy/Level 4 Instructors, the highest certified in Canada. Choose from Full Day - $518, Half Day Morning (3hrs) - $336, Half Day Afternoon (2.5hrs) - $284, 8:30am One Hour First Tracks - $115 or One Hour - $155.
How much a ski lesson charge is decided by the mountain so if you are not smart, you may get an instuctor ski worse than Normanding
That's why $120.00 to have Norman Kreutz teaching for 3 hours is a steal But he's smart too so he increased the lesson price to around $300.00 an afternoon.
Also I bet the guy won't pass his Level 3 in this season for US$100.00, do you want to bet? We may ask him in the comment in youtube.
#17 回覆: PK Event (Taichiskiing vs PKU)
發表於 : 週六 3月 19, 2011 12:16 pm
由 CrazyBoy
pku 寫:Then you should ask Norman Kreutz, he is charging less than $600.00 a day. He's the snow school director of Silverstar mountain. We are all using similar technique, combining the 5 skills together, Just he is blending them much better than me. I try to took an afternoon private lesson from him but he refused ( that time was only $120.00 for afternoon.). But we took some photo together.
How about we do it together. I can't afford to pay $500 for a day and you can also get his professional opinion. Danny is making smooth round turns, that's true.
#19 回覆: PK Event (Taichiskiing vs PKU)
發表於 : 週日 3月 20, 2011 1:34 pm
由 taichiskiing
pku 寫:Tranversing a slope to decelerate.
Not really, "carving" is "traversing" the slope on the edges, and "deceleration" without "braking" [in skiing] is a higher level skill.
Alpine skiing is to make efficient turns, less loss in energy and the product is fast. They are competing who is faster.
Not really, alpine skiing is to utilize the power of the gravity for the pleasures of sliding downhill. Different people may enjoy many different things, and not every skier wants to be a racer or ski fast, so "competing who is faster" is only a narrow scope/mentality of skiing; easy to brag, so ski fast/carving and steep become the "Holy Grail" of little knowledge. So, you have a narrow view of skiing. The "whole skiing" is more than just turning; nevertheless, you're partially right, speed is from efficient skiing, not just efficient turns, and efficient skiing has no extra movements,
Your skiing is doing skiding turns and tranvsering on steeps to kill speed to achieve safety skiing, inefficient turns, totally opposite to Alpine Skiing' target.
Well, you may know how to say it, but you don't know what you're talking about, as you are talking about yourself; check out the "spreads" your skidding turn generated,
No, I don't think that you "know" what a "slipping-turn" is.
Both are base on physics.
High end instructor skiing is try to be more control on the speed and still try to get the performance ( less energy loss ), They are also skiing according to physics.
Not really, care to show where in your CSIA training manuals they actually talking about physics of "slipping turn."
別人滑的好, 說人拙力多, 典型的小人
跟我的話學是不能罵人的（內容不附合），只有曝露你自己小知小人的心理‧
Turn-skiing, in its "highest" form, if it is not carving, then it is "skidded parallel turn," and "skidded parallel turn" uses "skidding" to brake/control the speed for "each" turn. 對，拙力太多‧小人是因為你自己的小知。
It's a small world, I come accross with Dan today in the PDP sesssion. He is an instuctor working on Cypress and he was wearing the blue ski jacket. After I heard his name call Dan and saying he's working on Cypress, I ask him if he's the guy sending the video to eopic ski and he said yes.
His timing and cordination is not as good as you said according to our CSIA L4 Examiner's comment.
